| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) 22:45 - Mar 12 with 3849 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
|  |
| |  |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:47 - Mar 12 with 3107 views | J2BLUE |
Perez probably threatened the super league again |  |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:52 - Mar 12 with 3062 views | WicklowBlue |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:47 - Mar 12 by J2BLUE |
Perez probably threatened the super league again |
Claimed two touches on the peno. Didn't seem like it must have brushed the ball as he slipped.
Very unfortunate thought Atheti were the better team overall. But again just needed to take their chances. |  | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:55 - Mar 12 with 3019 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:52 - Mar 12 by WicklowBlue |
Claimed two touches on the peno. Didn't seem like it must have brushed the ball as he slipped.
Very unfortunate thought Atheti were the better team overall. But again just needed to take their chances. |
I know the reason it was disallowed, but I'm not sure why VAR intervened?
Clear and obvious error? Even the replay didn't show the double touch clearly. | |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:57 - Mar 12 with 3003 views | WicklowBlue |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:55 - Mar 12 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I know the reason it was disallowed, but I'm not sure why VAR intervened?
Clear and obvious error? Even the replay didn't show the double touch clearly. |
Presume the Ref asked for it to be checked? | | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:00 - Mar 12 with 2976 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:57 - Mar 12 by WicklowBlue |
Presume the Ref asked for it to be checked? |
Surely for that to happen, he needs to make the decision to disallow the goal on his own first? | |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:07 - Mar 12 with 2940 views | itfcjoe |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 22:55 - Mar 12 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I know the reason it was disallowed, but I'm not sure why VAR intervened?
Clear and obvious error? Even the replay didn't show the double touch clearly. |
All goals are checked, it was a goal so it was checked and its an illegal penalty |  |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:09 - Mar 12 with 2920 views | Garv |
If they do nothing I don't think anyone in the world complains at that penalty.
Crazy. |  |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:10 - Mar 12 with 2917 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:07 - Mar 12 by itfcjoe |
All goals are checked, it was a goal so it was checked and its an illegal penalty |
I lose track of the protocol with the VAR nonsense.
What a criminal way to end a tie. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:11 - Mar 12 with 2903 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:09 - Mar 12 by Garv |
If they do nothing I don't think anyone in the world complains at that penalty.
Crazy. |
This.
I don't think even the RM cheats complained. | |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:12 - Mar 12 with 2901 views | noubledooble |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:07 - Mar 12 by itfcjoe |
All goals are checked, it was a goal so it was checked and its an illegal penalty |
How do they know 100% he’s touched it twice |  | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:13 - Mar 12 with 2889 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:12 - Mar 12 by noubledooble |
How do they know 100% he’s touched it twice |
Didn't look clear on the replay.
That never stops VAR though. | |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 00:41 - Mar 13 with 2733 views | stonojnr |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:09 - Mar 12 by Garv |
If they do nothing I don't think anyone in the world complains at that penalty.
Crazy. |
well other than he almost spooned it over for a conversion :)
but if VAR is ruling that out they need to show us the actual footage that shows the double touch clearly, which they didnt really, probably because it really wasnt conclusive enough. |  | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 06:55 - Mar 13 with 2503 views | BrandonsBlues |
Champions league corrupt as
Champions league corrupt as | | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 07:54 - Mar 13 with 2314 views | iamatractorboy |
Just saw it this morning. In what world is that 'clear and obvious'? | | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:00 - Mar 13 with 2290 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 23:09 - Mar 12 by Garv |
If they do nothing I don't think anyone in the world complains at that penalty.
Crazy. |
Although it looked like the Real players were questioning the ref about it before the VAR check, so maybe it’s one that could be heard quite clearly in the ground even if it wasn’t that obvious on the TV?
It does seem harsh though. But this is where we’re at now with the precision being asked of VAR. |  |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:01 - Mar 13 with 2289 views | Blue_In_Boston |
On goal decisions the words clear and obvious don't apply. It's a straight applying of the rules, he touched it twice - simple as. | | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:05 - Mar 13 with 2267 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:01 - Mar 13 by Blue_In_Boston |
On goal decisions the words clear and obvious don't apply. It's a straight applying of the rules, he touched it twice - simple as. |
There's not even conclusive evidence of a double touch.
Football is f**cked.
A real pedants w4nkfest last night. | |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:14 - Mar 13 with 2206 views | iamatractorboy |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:01 - Mar 13 by Blue_In_Boston |
On goal decisions the words clear and obvious don't apply. It's a straight applying of the rules, he touched it twice - simple as. |
Did he though? I certainly couldn't tell either way. | | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:14 - Mar 13 with 2204 views | BlueOura |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:01 - Mar 13 by Blue_In_Boston |
On goal decisions the words clear and obvious don't apply. It's a straight applying of the rules, he touched it twice - simple as. |
Did he? You sure about that? I'm not and i've watched the replay about 10 times. |  | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:40 - Mar 13 with 2142 views | BarcaBlue |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:01 - Mar 13 by Blue_In_Boston |
On goal decisions the words clear and obvious don't apply. It's a straight applying of the rules, he touched it twice - simple as. |
Catalan tv have shown the penalty numerous times this morning with close-ups and different angles and there's no clear evidence that the ball was touched twice. I don't see how VAR could have made that decision in the 20 seconds or so they took. |  | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:45 - Mar 13 with 2106 views | itfcjoe |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:01 - Mar 13 by Blue_In_Boston |
On goal decisions the words clear and obvious don't apply. It's a straight applying of the rules, he touched it twice - simple as. |
Yep - I'm struggling to see the controversy here. It looked like a double hit straight away and VAR must have been able to tell pretty quickly that it was.
The rule is the rule, it's not about interpretation - the ball does barely move but clearly hits both feet.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gl4hEkqXAAALkMF?format=jpg&name=900x900 | |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:51 - Mar 13 with 2052 views | itfcjoe |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:40 - Mar 13 by BarcaBlue |
Catalan tv have shown the penalty numerous times this morning with close-ups and different angles and there's no clear evidence that the ball was touched twice. I don't see how VAR could have made that decision in the 20 seconds or so they took. |
Here you go, they should try this angle
| |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:53 - Mar 13 with 2016 views | NeedhamChris |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:51 - Mar 13 by itfcjoe |
Here you go, they should try this angle
|
Yeah, it's controversial because of the stage of the game - but it shouldn't be a controversial decision. Straight forward double touch and disallowed penalty. | |
| |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 09:10 - Mar 13 with 1930 views | iamatractorboy |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:51 - Mar 13 by itfcjoe |
Here you go, they should try this angle
|
Fair enough, that does show it. | | | |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 09:22 - Mar 13 with 1869 views | DJR |
| Soooo..... on what basis did VAR need to get involved there?! (n/t) on 08:51 - Mar 13 by itfcjoe |
Here you go, they should try this angle
|
Maybe it's just me but I am still not wholly convinced from that angle that his left foot actually touches the ball (assuming that is part of the offence). [Post edited 13 Mar 9:30]
|  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
