Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? 13:59 - Sep 15 with 1082 viewsIPSWICHFANITFC

If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt?


Your Vote:

You need to be logged in to vote on our site polls


Poll: If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt?

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:02 - Sep 15 with 1053 viewsMetal_Hacker

And where would you play Freddie ?

Poll: Philogene Conundrum

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:02 - Sep 15 with 1058 viewsITFC_Forever

Because Garbutt will accept a wage of £1500 - £2000????

P 1162, W 506, D 298, L 358, F 1749, A 1435 89 /92
Blog: Confessions of a Statto - Why We Bother

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:05 - Sep 15 with 1042 viewsJ2BLUE

If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:02 - Sep 15 by ITFC_Forever

Because Garbutt will accept a wage of £1500 - £2000????


If he's training with Everton what are the chances they sign him and loan him to a league one club as a favour to him? They pay him £5k a week and we pay them £260k loan fee...if that is within the rules.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:08 - Sep 15 with 1021 viewsKieran_Knows

If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:02 - Sep 15 by ITFC_Forever

Because Garbutt will accept a wage of £1500 - £2000????


I mean, without knowing the full details, it's not as if he's awash with offers at the moment?

He's just earned £28k a week for 5 years at Everton, I can't imagine he's short of a pound or 2. 1 season here (or any other salary capped club for that matter) will raise his profile that'll either a) help said club get promoted and then back earning to what he wants in the Championship or b) plays well enough to get himself a good move elsewhere on more money.

Poll: We’ve got super KM, he knows exactly what we need. Woolfie at the back…

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:09 - Sep 15 with 1016 viewsmonty_radio

If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:02 - Sep 15 by ITFC_Forever

Because Garbutt will accept a wage of £1500 - £2000????


I'd like Garbutt, probably left midfield, but is he really a wide man? I think that may have been part of his career problem. Sweet left peg and all that, but not a great defender nor blessed with noticeable pace or, failing that, a trick or two.
[Post edited 15 Sep 2020 16:09]

Blog: Too Many Suspects? – A Swede Ramble

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:12 - Sep 15 with 1000 viewsBryanPlug

If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 14:02 - Sep 15 by ITFC_Forever

Because Garbutt will accept a wage of £1500 - £2000????


[content removed at owner's request]

Poll: What should the status of a turntable lid be when playing records?

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 16:44 - Sep 15 with 814 viewsThatMuhrenCross

Quite clearly I would.

To those saying that he wouldn't accept what wages we were offering, he's earning nothing at the moment. Clearly no Championship clubs are interested so he's going to need to take the wage cut if he wants to play.

Is there anything in the rules that prevents us putting in a massive "promotion bonus" and paying him a very small basic?

Poll: Ipswich offer you 10k a week, Norwich offer you 20k. Who do you join?
Blog: The Cashless Debate

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 16:47 - Sep 15 with 795 viewsThatMuhrenCross

"Payments directly linked to a Club’s progression in cup competitions or promotion are excluded from the Cap, while any income generated from players going out on loan is deducted from the Club’s Salary Cap calculation."

Source: https://www.efl.com/news/2020/august/squad-salary-caps-introduced-in-league-one-

So what's to say we couldn't offer him £1k per week, plus a £1m promotion bonus which would essentially be the equivalent of almost £20k per week?

Then again, maybe we have, but he's not interested!

Poll: Ipswich offer you 10k a week, Norwich offer you 20k. Who do you join?
Blog: The Cashless Debate

0
Login to get fewer ads

If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 16:49 - Sep 15 with 789 viewsjayessess

Would leave us a bit short up front, wouldn't it?

Blog: What Now? Taking a Look at Life in League One

0
If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt? on 17:43 - Sep 15 with 726 viewsSwansea_Blue

I don't think we need to do that business. Although we're stacked with players who can play on the right of a front 3, the benefit of Jackson is also as a foil in a 2 upfront. We saw what he could do last season in that role in terms of both assists and goals, and he's consistent.

Unless he pushes for a move I'd resist any offers. The squad as it stands is fine even if left wing is a bit light, with only really Freddie who's had a lot of experience in that role.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025