| Derby looking in even more trouble? 10:31 - Aug 5 with 2529 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Unable to complete fixture on Saturday potentially.
|  |
| |  |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 10:43 - Aug 5 with 2385 views | ZXBlue |
Sounds highly unlikely to me.
A contract without any figures is hardly going to be enforceable. |  | | |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 10:47 - Aug 5 with 2316 views | Mookamoo |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 10:43 - Aug 5 by ZXBlue |
Sounds highly unlikely to me.
A contract without any figures is hardly going to be enforceable. |
Plus the players have never seen their own contracts. They have their people do that. |  | | |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 11:01 - Aug 5 with 2190 views | loftboy |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 10:47 - Aug 5 by Mookamoo |
Plus the players have never seen their own contracts. They have their people do that. |
Wouldn’t these be for the youth players and triallists they have, the rest of the squad would already be contracted. | | | |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 12:59 - Aug 5 with 1843 views | ElderGrizzly |
They're only allowed to sign 6 players under the embargo and those can only be free transfers or loans with a reported maximum salary of £8k a week. |  | | |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 13:44 - Aug 5 with 1649 views | wkj |
Mel Morris would surely fail the fitness test for football ownership now - surely he has to be banned from the sport ASAP.
I know derby are technically in a better spot than we are, but it goes to show that bloating your squad and throwing money around has tremendous risks. |  |
| |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 13:55 - Aug 5 with 1586 views | BlueBlueBluex2 |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 10:43 - Aug 5 by ZXBlue |
Sounds highly unlikely to me.
A contract without any figures is hardly going to be enforceable. |
Of course it can. A contract is simply a statement that you either agreed or disagree to adhere to and sign or not sign. | | | |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 14:53 - Aug 5 with 1417 views | Radlett_blue |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 13:55 - Aug 5 by BlueBlueBluex2 |
Of course it can. A contract is simply a statement that you either agreed or disagree to adhere to and sign or not sign. |
Many companies that are bust are sold for a token £1 as there has to be an exchange to create a contract. |  |
| |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 14:59 - Aug 5 with 1382 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 10:43 - Aug 5 by ZXBlue |
Sounds highly unlikely to me.
A contract without any figures is hardly going to be enforceable. |
It is clearly made up by a "journalist" with a very poor reputation.
If a player did receive such a contract, I am sure their agent would advise them what value to fill in before signing. Since Derby are limited to £8K contracts by the authorities, I would imagine that would be the figure. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 15:15 - Aug 5 with 1306 views | GeoffSentence |
It is a shame what is happening at Derby. They were, with us and Forest, in a handful of unfashionable clubs that made football interesting in the 70s and 80s |  |
| |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 15:15 - Aug 5 with 1306 views | BlueBlueBluex2 |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 14:53 - Aug 5 by Radlett_blue |
Many companies that are bust are sold for a token £1 as there has to be an exchange to create a contract. |
This is a contract of employment but I get where you are coming from.
A contract between you and I could read "will you come over every Saturday to wash my car at 09:00"
You sign it or you don't. It does not mention any form of payment however it would be still be classed as a contract.
Of course, you would be foolish to sign, just as the players would. My car is a disgrace right now. | | | |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 15:24 - Aug 5 with 1212 views | Zx1988 |
| Derby looking in even more trouble? on 15:15 - Aug 5 by BlueBlueBluex2 |
This is a contract of employment but I get where you are coming from.
A contract between you and I could read "will you come over every Saturday to wash my car at 09:00"
You sign it or you don't. It does not mention any form of payment however it would be still be classed as a contract.
Of course, you would be foolish to sign, just as the players would. My car is a disgrace right now. |
That's not a contract in the slightest.
Regardless of the nature (sale, employment, whatever) there has to be valuable consideration in order for the contract to be valid. (Thomas v Thomas) (1842) 2 QB 851
The example you have given does not provide any consideration (even the oft-used peppercorn would suffice) and therefore no contract is created. [Post edited 5 Aug 2021 15:28]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
