| Woolfy! (n/t) 19:01 - Dec 27 with 3002 views | catch74 |
[Post edited 27 Dec 2024 19:02]
|  |
| |  |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:02 - Dec 27 with 2966 views | Tonytown |
No Burgess, but 5 at the back is sensible |  | | |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:04 - Dec 27 with 2683 views | JammyDodgerrr |
Don't really like the likely shift in formation tbh. Going to be a long night. |  |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:05 - Dec 27 with 2645 views | itfcbam |
Burgess game time being managed, obviously with Chelsea in mind. Do have to wonder what Walton has to do to get in team. How many mistakes will Muric get away with, seems undroppable? That said let's hope for a big performance from him tonight | | | |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:05 - Dec 27 with 2624 views | suffolkpunchdrunk |
Woolfy at the back, Delapo in attack! |  | | |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:05 - Dec 27 with 2604 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:04 - Dec 27 by JammyDodgerrr |
Don't really like the likely shift in formation tbh. Going to be a long night. |
5 4 1 and 3 4 3. Beautiful. |  |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:05 - Dec 27 with 2602 views | Oldsmoker |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:02 - Dec 27 by Tonytown |
No Burgess, but 5 at the back is sensible |
5 is the magic number.
But no 5 Morsy is missing I hear you say.
Just shut up. |  |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:07 - Dec 27 with 2466 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:04 - Dec 27 by JammyDodgerrr |
Don't really like the likely shift in formation tbh. Going to be a long night. |
It 100% needs to happen.
I'd be more worried if he hadn't changed it. |  |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:09 - Dec 27 with 2312 views | pointofblue |
Like it. Mind you, it was such an obvious move practically everyone on here was asking for it. Wonder what's up with Burgess?
I have no idea if this will work...
| |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:09 - Dec 27 with 2315 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:04 - Dec 27 by JammyDodgerrr |
Don't really like the likely shift in formation tbh. Going to be a long night. |
Seems sensible to me. We’re unlikely to have big spells on top where we get bodies high up the pitch. Keep it tight and look to hit them on the break seems sensible. Although we’ve still got the option to use Leif and Johnson as attacking threats, which plays to their strengths whilst keeping an extra man back. On paper it works for me. Hopefully it works on grass too! |  |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:10 - Dec 27 with 2289 views | jasondozzell |
So pleased for Woolfy that's he got back in. Classy player. |  | | |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:11 - Dec 27 with 2230 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:07 - Dec 27 by Marshalls_Mullet |
It 100% needs to happen.
I'd be more worried if he hadn't changed it. |
Nah. Just inviting more pressure and moving away from the things we know we are good at by setting up differently. And we have to bring in Woolfy who hasn't played in over two months, against Gabriel Jesus of all people.
Happy to be wrong, obviously. [Post edited 27 Dec 2024 19:13]
| |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:15 - Dec 27 with 2027 views | pointofblue |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:11 - Dec 27 by JammyDodgerrr |
Nah. Just inviting more pressure and moving away from the things we know we are good at by setting up differently. And we have to bring in Woolfy who hasn't played in over two months, against Gabriel Jesus of all people.
Happy to be wrong, obviously. [Post edited 27 Dec 2024 19:13]
|
I am interested why Woolfenden's there ahead of Burgess, though it's nice to see him given a chance. Big test, though.
I think you have to consider how our usual formation has played out over the past few games. If we did that tonight, we would have got a hiding. Admittedly, we may still do, but at least we're trying something different. | |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:25 - Dec 27 with 1794 views | Vic |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:07 - Dec 27 by Marshalls_Mullet |
It 100% needs to happen.
I'd be more worried if he hadn't changed it. |
I tend to agree MM. Slightly, just slightly more easy seeing that KM has shown a bit of pragmatism about this. Just about anyone who is any9ne in football and commented on our game v NUFC said we just have to change our defensive tactics. So I’m pleased with this, though not sure it change the outcome! |  |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:35 - Dec 27 with 1653 views | pointofblue |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:25 - Dec 27 by Vic |
I tend to agree MM. Slightly, just slightly more easy seeing that KM has shown a bit of pragmatism about this. Just about anyone who is any9ne in football and commented on our game v NUFC said we just have to change our defensive tactics. So I’m pleased with this, though not sure it change the outcome! |
As pointed out on another thread, it might not be a change of formation. O'Shea to right back, Johnson in front. Hope it is a back three though.
Did notice we only have three players from last year in the starting line up - Davis, Woolfenden and Hutchinson. Is that the lowest number we've had this season? | |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:36 - Dec 27 with 1655 views | DBaldy |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:15 - Dec 27 by pointofblue |
I am interested why Woolfenden's there ahead of Burgess, though it's nice to see him given a chance. Big test, though.
I think you have to consider how our usual formation has played out over the past few games. If we did that tonight, we would have got a hiding. Admittedly, we may still do, but at least we're trying something different. |
I would guess Woolfy's in because he right footed. I'm expecting O'Shea at RB with Johnson right midfield but dropping back to RB when out of possession, same as we did vs Spurs. | | | |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:38 - Dec 27 with 1598 views | Eireannach_gorm |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:02 - Dec 27 by Tonytown |
No Burgess, but 5 at the back is sensible |
A bight light on defenders in the subs. Hope that there are no more injuries during the game. |  | | |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:42 - Dec 27 with 1505 views | catch74 |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 19:36 - Dec 27 by DBaldy |
I would guess Woolfy's in because he right footed. I'm expecting O'Shea at RB with Johnson right midfield but dropping back to RB when out of possession, same as we did vs Spurs. |
This | |
| |
| Woolfy! (n/t) on 20:40 - Dec 27 with 1130 views | Eireannach_gorm |
Should have cut that out. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
