| Well that didn’t go to plan 21:48 - Mar 27 with 7048 views | Samuelowen88 |
None of the options were supported.... so yup, MP’s taking back control is going well |  |
| |  |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:11 - Mar 27 with 1783 views | footers |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:09 - Mar 27 by BloomBlue |
If they win a GE, businesses would be heading out of this country in the 1000s, they are anti business. |
What do you think has happened since your beloved Brexit? |  |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:13 - Mar 27 with 1777 views | footers |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:07 - Mar 27 by ElderGrizzly |
Well of course we will just win 450 seats, but I didn’t want to jinx it :) |
Yes, I especially liked your very popular socialism-lite manifesto from a few years back. Hmmm. | |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:13 - Mar 27 with 1777 views | J2BLUE |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:09 - Mar 27 by BloomBlue |
If they win a GE, businesses would be heading out of this country in the 1000s, they are anti business. |
Doubt it.
The UK is a large market for their products. If they don't play ball perhaps they shouldn't be allowed to sell here.
Time to stand up to the giant corporations. |  |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:14 - Mar 27 with 1776 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:04 - Mar 27 by J2BLUE |
If you live in the real world. |
M. Confirmatory public vote — DEFEATED 268 to 295
Drawn up by the Labour MPs Peter Kyle and Phil Wilson and tabled by the former foreign secretary Dame Margaret Beckett with the backing of scores of MPs across the house, this motion would require a public vote to confirm any Brexit deal passed by parliament before its ratification |  |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:15 - Mar 27 with 1768 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:14 - Mar 27 by BanksterDebtSlave |
M. Confirmatory public vote — DEFEATED 268 to 295
Drawn up by the Labour MPs Peter Kyle and Phil Wilson and tabled by the former foreign secretary Dame Margaret Beckett with the backing of scores of MPs across the house, this motion would require a public vote to confirm any Brexit deal passed by parliament before its ratification |
Yet gained more votes than May’s deal |  | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:16 - Mar 27 with 1764 views | pickles110564 |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:14 - Mar 27 by BanksterDebtSlave |
M. Confirmatory public vote — DEFEATED 268 to 295
Drawn up by the Labour MPs Peter Kyle and Phil Wilson and tabled by the former foreign secretary Dame Margaret Beckett with the backing of scores of MPs across the house, this motion would require a public vote to confirm any Brexit deal passed by parliament before its ratification |
Steady there Bankster, J2 does not like facts that goes against his views. |  | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:17 - Mar 27 with 1761 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:13 - Mar 27 by J2BLUE |
Doubt it.
The UK is a large market for their products. If they don't play ball perhaps they shouldn't be allowed to sell here.
Time to stand up to the giant corporations. |
Stand up to them, so they take hundreds of thousands of jobs away?
For what it’s worth, i don’t think businesses would leave, but they would reduce investment in some key sectors | | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:17 - Mar 27 with 1757 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:15 - Mar 27 by ElderGrizzly |
Yet gained more votes than May’s deal |
So? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:18 - Mar 27 with 1753 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:16 - Mar 27 by pickles110564 |
Steady there Bankster, J2 does not like facts that goes against his views. |
He has literally changed his view. He voted Leave and has seen the light | | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:19 - Mar 27 with 1746 views | ElderGrizzly |
So?
It has received more support from MPs than May’s deal. If it was put on a head to head vote, it would win. We may see that next week | | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:19 - Mar 27 with 1748 views | Trequartista |
Apparently they can do the same vote again on Monday. But Bercow's rule? No, it's a two-parter. Incredible stuff. |  |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:20 - Mar 27 with 1741 views | Sarge |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:16 - Mar 27 by pickles110564 |
Steady there Bankster, J2 does not like facts that goes against his views. |
Lol come on mate, massive irony here. J2 is possibly the only person on this board that can debate both sides and can openly change his views based on facts. Compare that with your good self who simply makes things up or disappears when challenged on your views on Brexit. |  | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:22 - Mar 27 with 1725 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:09 - Mar 27 by BloomBlue |
If they win a GE, businesses would be heading out of this country in the 1000s, they are anti business. |
As fast as it is thanks to the threat of Brexit? |  |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:24 - Mar 27 with 1713 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 21:50 - Mar 27 by J2BLUE |
Only good thing is that if parliament can't agree maybe it strengthens the call for a second vote.
May's deal versus remain. |
This shows what a mess it is too. So much for the whipping of Labour MPs
| | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:24 - Mar 27 with 1713 views | footers |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:22 - Mar 27 by Nthsuffolkblue |
As fast as it is thanks to the threat of Brexit? |
A trillion in assets and 7k jobs were lost last week due to Brexit. Go figure, as the yanquis would say. | |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:27 - Mar 27 with 1699 views | J2BLUE |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:14 - Mar 27 by BanksterDebtSlave |
M. Confirmatory public vote — DEFEATED 268 to 295
Drawn up by the Labour MPs Peter Kyle and Phil Wilson and tabled by the former foreign secretary Dame Margaret Beckett with the backing of scores of MPs across the house, this motion would require a public vote to confirm any Brexit deal passed by parliament before its ratification |
563 voted. I believe 649 can vote.
That leaves 86. 86 is a bigger number than 27. You're also assuming that more won't agree in future when it becomes clear parliament will never solve this issue. | |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:32 - Mar 27 with 1680 views | factual_blue |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 21:58 - Mar 27 by J2BLUE |
I will be voting Labour after the last fortnight. The Tories have been a disgrace. So openly self serving. They deserve a spell in opposition. |
Several deserve a spell in an oubliette. About forty years should suffice. |  |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:33 - Mar 27 with 1680 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:27 - Mar 27 by J2BLUE |
563 voted. I believe 649 can vote.
That leaves 86. 86 is a bigger number than 27. You're also assuming that more won't agree in future when it becomes clear parliament will never solve this issue. |
20 of May’s cabinet ministers were forced to abstain of course too. | | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:34 - Mar 27 with 1668 views | J2BLUE |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:17 - Mar 27 by ElderGrizzly |
Stand up to them, so they take hundreds of thousands of jobs away?
For what it’s worth, i don’t think businesses would leave, but they would reduce investment in some key sectors |
A tit for tat war isn't a good idea but if we can be bullied by corporations it's a bit sad.
If you could choose a Conservative government and May's deal or Labour and remain which would you choose? | |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:35 - Mar 27 with 1664 views | footers |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:34 - Mar 27 by J2BLUE |
A tit for tat war isn't a good idea but if we can be bullied by corporations it's a bit sad.
If you could choose a Conservative government and May's deal or Labour and remain which would you choose? |
I would choose a bit more tit than tat. Seems obvious to me. | |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:36 - Mar 27 with 1662 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:34 - Mar 27 by J2BLUE |
A tit for tat war isn't a good idea but if we can be bullied by corporations it's a bit sad.
If you could choose a Conservative government and May's deal or Labour and remain which would you choose? |
The latter as Brexit is more damaging than Corbyn ever could be.
I’d also never vote Tory, but still. | | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:36 - Mar 27 with 1656 views | SpruceMoose |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:34 - Mar 27 by J2BLUE |
A tit for tat war isn't a good idea but if we can be bullied by corporations it's a bit sad.
If you could choose a Conservative government and May's deal or Labour and remain which would you choose? |
Anything a can assist you with Prime Minister Corbyn? |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:38 - Mar 27 with 1644 views | footers |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:36 - Mar 27 by ElderGrizzly |
The latter as Brexit is more damaging than Corbyn ever could be.
I’d also never vote Tory, but still. |
But still, you'd support a Tory-led coalition ;) | |
| |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:38 - Mar 27 with 1635 views | XYZ |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:09 - Mar 27 by BloomBlue |
If they win a GE, businesses would be heading out of this country in the 1000s, they are anti business. |
You prefer the f*ck business party? | | | |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:39 - Mar 27 with 1624 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Well that didn’t go to plan on 22:38 - Mar 27 by footers |
But still, you'd support a Tory-led coalition ;) |
Personally no. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
