| The team 14:01 - Feb 8 with 4194 views | Herbivore |
|  |
| |  |
| The team on 14:23 - Feb 8 with 930 views | Herbivore |
| The team on 14:11 - Feb 8 by SomethingBlue |
Presumably didn't want to take a risk with Huws and decided Judge not right defensively for this one, so I do get why Keane might be good as link man here. Very little pace or creativity though, as you say. However - Sunderland's selection doesn't exactly fill me with fear and a draw is attainable. |
I don't understand why he's persisting with the system though when both our wing backs are out. It's not like it's really worked that well, we've had better form since Xmas than in the month and a half prior but it's still not been great. It's a really poor team selection for me, I can't get my head around how he thinks that works as a line up. | |
| |
| The team on 14:23 - Feb 8 with 925 views | Guthrum |
| The team on 14:17 - Feb 8 by Herbivore |
Go to a back four given that we've not got any wing backs fit. Stick three up front. There's plenty of options in the squad even with injuries and suspensions. That is a really poor side. |
Solidity of defence would be a good start, see if we can keep a clean sheet. |  |
| |
| The team on 14:24 - Feb 8 with 914 views | billlm |
Il take a point now team from Lambert, very defensive and no creativity there, I'm starting to question now, |  | | |
| The team on 14:25 - Feb 8 with 906 views | Herbivore |
| The team on 14:23 - Feb 8 by Guthrum |
Solidity of defence would be a good start, see if we can keep a clean sheet. |
I'm not sure this is the best way to get a solid defence though. Five at the back doesn't automatically make you more solid than a back four. | |
| |
| The team on 14:25 - Feb 8 with 904 views | StokieBlue |
| The team on 14:14 - Feb 8 by Terry_Nutkins |
Keane is a much much better player than Jackson. Jackson's pace is the only thing we lose. Keane and Norwood are our best 2 strikers. They need service though! |
I think every stat from this season would disagree with that opinion.
A lot of Ipswich fans really seem to have it in for Jackson regardless of his performances. Perhaps a hangover from last year.
SB |  | | |
| The team on 14:28 - Feb 8 with 882 views | Bluefish |
That teams screams route 1. We are back to a massive gap between the midfield and forwards |  |
| |
| The team on 14:31 - Feb 8 with 866 views | GlasgowBlue |
Playing for a draw. Will gift them a goal in stoppage time just before half time.
COYB |  |
| |
| The team on 14:32 - Feb 8 with 858 views | reusersfreekicks |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 by Bluebell |
Keane has been playing well the last few weeks. Jackson not so much. |
Not v Peterborough |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| The team on 14:38 - Feb 8 with 820 views | Coastalblue |
| The team on 14:25 - Feb 8 by StokieBlue |
I think every stat from this season would disagree with that opinion.
A lot of Ipswich fans really seem to have it in for Jackson regardless of his performances. Perhaps a hangover from last year.
SB |
Agree with that, whilst Norwood hasn't really done much to elevate him to the level some seem to put him at.
I will accept, I do like Keane as a player, but actually I think Jackson and Norwood have been our best combination, Norwood does offer a bit of grit even if there's not a lot of quality.
Wouldn't pick him in front of Jackson though.
Not a particularly inspiring side there, so hopefully we'll go and complete a boring 2-0 win and Norwood gets both. |  |
| |
| The team on 14:39 - Feb 8 with 810 views | Bluebell |
Did anyone play well against Peterborough? |  | | |
| The team on 14:49 - Feb 8 with 777 views | pablovian |
I do not see much to debate, unless Huws is fit enough to start. Kenlock can be effective going forward; it is as a defender that he lacks confidence. Our choice of forwards is any two of three of hustle, pace and skill, with the third one on the bench. Starting with hustle and skill is reasonable. If this line up plays with heart we may do well today. |  | | |
| The team on 14:52 - Feb 8 with 766 views | Herbivore |
| The team on 14:49 - Feb 8 by pablovian |
I do not see much to debate, unless Huws is fit enough to start. Kenlock can be effective going forward; it is as a defender that he lacks confidence. Our choice of forwards is any two of three of hustle, pace and skill, with the third one on the bench. Starting with hustle and skill is reasonable. If this line up plays with heart we may do well today. |
I'll have one of whatever you're drinking. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
