| The team 14:01 - Feb 8 with 4231 views | Herbivore |
|  |
| |  |
| The team on 14:02 - Feb 8 with 3248 views | Herbivore |
The good news is that Holy's back. That's about it. | |
| |
| The team on 14:02 - Feb 8 with 3231 views | ITFCBlues |
Kenlock and Donacien as wing backs ffs |  |
| |
| The team on 14:03 - Feb 8 with 3194 views | tractordownsouth |
Effectively a flat back 5 and Skuse? Keane had to be the one to drop out, not Jackson surely? Besides the inclusion of Holy, that's poor. |  |
| |
| The team on 14:04 - Feb 8 with 3137 views | JDB23 |
3-5-2 with Skuse Downes and Nolan LOL. I like literally nothing about this team other than Holy, watch us win 3-0 now. |  | | |
| The team on 14:04 - Feb 8 with 3128 views | BackToRussia |
Zero creativity. |  |
| |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 with 3091 views | ParisBlue |
Downed and Woolfenden aside that team doesn't half lack some quality... |  |
| |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 with 3082 views | footers |
Good grief. |  |
| |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 with 3072 views | Chrisd |
| The team on 14:02 - Feb 8 by ITFCBlues |
Kenlock and Donacien as wing backs ffs |
Not sure about this formation with the personnel available, but if we get 3 points I won't be complaining. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 with 3073 views | Herbivore |
| The team on 14:03 - Feb 8 by tractordownsouth |
Effectively a flat back 5 and Skuse? Keane had to be the one to drop out, not Jackson surely? Besides the inclusion of Holy, that's poor. |
It's a mess. It's basically a flat back 5. We'll have zero width. There's no pace in that side at all. There's no real creative spark anywhere. There's a front 2 that simply haven't clicked at all when played together. Looks like we're playing for a 0-0. | |
| |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 with 3068 views | Bluebell |
| The team on 14:03 - Feb 8 by tractordownsouth |
Effectively a flat back 5 and Skuse? Keane had to be the one to drop out, not Jackson surely? Besides the inclusion of Holy, that's poor. |
Keane has been playing well the last few weeks. Jackson not so much. |  | | |
| The team on 14:06 - Feb 8 with 3012 views | tractordownsouth |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 by Bluebell |
Keane has been playing well the last few weeks. Jackson not so much. |
That team has 0 pace though | |
| |
| The team on 14:06 - Feb 8 with 3011 views | JDB23 |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 by Herbivore |
It's a mess. It's basically a flat back 5. We'll have zero width. There's no pace in that side at all. There's no real creative spark anywhere. There's a front 2 that simply haven't clicked at all when played together. Looks like we're playing for a 0-0. |
Quite possibly the worst line up we’ve put out this season. Football is a funny old game though. | | | |
| The team on 14:07 - Feb 8 with 2977 views | Herbivore |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 by Bluebell |
Keane has been playing well the last few weeks. Jackson not so much. |
Not based on what I've seen. Keane has looked poor lately, esepcially since starting, whereas Jackson always offers a threat even if his end product has been hit and miss. I think Norwood deserves a start but it should be alongside Jackson, they've been our best partnership. | |
| |
| The team on 14:07 - Feb 8 with 2978 views | jas0999 |
Five defenders, two being asked to play wing back when they are any thing but?
Can’t see any creativity in that team at all.
Bench looks strong! | | | |
| The team on 14:09 - Feb 8 with 2914 views | BackToRussia |
Also, the state of our fans on twitter. All they give a sh1t about is Holy and "dubs", whatever the fook they are | |
| |
| The team on 14:09 - Feb 8 with 2891 views | Guthrum |
Not sure what alternative we have with Huws perhaps not fit enough to start and other injuries/suspensions. |  |
| |
| The team on 14:10 - Feb 8 with 2848 views | Darth_Koont |
| The team on 14:03 - Feb 8 by tractordownsouth |
Effectively a flat back 5 and Skuse? Keane had to be the one to drop out, not Jackson surely? Besides the inclusion of Holy, that's poor. |
Agreed. Although I think Nolan for Judge could be a positive change.
This puts a lot of pressure on our back 5 + Skuse to get up in support and, with the exception of Woolfenden, none of them look that comfortable doing that.
The good news is that there's room to make all sorts of changes from the bench if it really doesn't work. |  |
| |
| The team on 14:11 - Feb 8 with 2842 views | itfcbam |
moan, moan, moan, negative, negative, ffs. who else was going to play wing back?? Not ideal but how about something different like get behind whoever puts on the shirt!!
Huws has had a knock so, as much as I would love to see home start, probably is only fit for the bench and guess Nolan is in due to his work rate off the ball being much higher than Judge's. When game stretches later then he might come on for impact. Then again I will be seen as a happy Clapper, so what do I know!! | | | |
| The team on 14:11 - Feb 8 with 2836 views | hampstead_blue |
It's as if Lambert likes self harm! No goal threat at all. |  |
| Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
| | Poll: | Best Blackpool goal |
| |
| The team on 14:11 - Feb 8 with 2822 views | SomethingBlue |
| The team on 14:05 - Feb 8 by Herbivore |
It's a mess. It's basically a flat back 5. We'll have zero width. There's no pace in that side at all. There's no real creative spark anywhere. There's a front 2 that simply haven't clicked at all when played together. Looks like we're playing for a 0-0. |
Presumably didn't want to take a risk with Huws and decided Judge not right defensively for this one, so I do get why Keane might be good as link man here. Very little pace or creativity though, as you say. However - Sunderland's selection doesn't exactly fill me with fear and a draw is attainable. | |
| |
| The team on 14:13 - Feb 8 with 2774 views | Dubtractor |
Oh no, I don't like that team at all. Not one bit.
Crap wing backs. Nil creativity in midfield. Retained the ineffective Keane from the start.
We'll prob win after that whinge! |  |
| |
| The team on 14:14 - Feb 8 with 2743 views | Terry_Nutkins |
| The team on 14:07 - Feb 8 by Herbivore |
Not based on what I've seen. Keane has looked poor lately, esepcially since starting, whereas Jackson always offers a threat even if his end product has been hit and miss. I think Norwood deserves a start but it should be alongside Jackson, they've been our best partnership. |
Keane is a much much better player than Jackson. Jackson's pace is the only thing we lose. Keane and Norwood are our best 2 strikers. They need service though! | |
| |
| The team on 14:17 - Feb 8 with 2686 views | Herbivore |
| The team on 14:09 - Feb 8 by Guthrum |
Not sure what alternative we have with Huws perhaps not fit enough to start and other injuries/suspensions. |
Go to a back four given that we've not got any wing backs fit. Stick three up front. There's plenty of options in the squad even with injuries and suspensions. That is a really poor side. | |
| |
| The team on 14:19 - Feb 8 with 2651 views | Herbivore |
| The team on 14:14 - Feb 8 by Terry_Nutkins |
Keane is a much much better player than Jackson. Jackson's pace is the only thing we lose. Keane and Norwood are our best 2 strikers. They need service though! |
Completely disagree. | |
| |
| The team on 14:20 - Feb 8 with 2619 views | Mossy |
Gone for a compact team. Seems like he is hoping for a draw. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
