| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million 15:28 - Aug 10 with 4503 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
for Jackson, we should probably take it.
However, I'm going for £450k, which we won't take and then we'll lose him on a free. |  |
| |  |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:31 - Aug 10 with 3839 views | AlexGreen |
Agreed, although to be honest I think I'd rather lose him on a free in two years time vs lose him now for 450K. |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:32 - Aug 10 with 3835 views | JakeITFC |
There doesn't seem much value in selling any player with a wage higher than the average League One salary atm, does there? |  | | |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:33 - Aug 10 with 3826 views | Mullet |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:32 - Aug 10 by JakeITFC |
There doesn't seem much value in selling any player with a wage higher than the average League One salary atm, does there? |
Exactly. It's only value to Evans if he wants to put less in per year. What it actually does is weaken our position considerably. |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:33 - Aug 10 with 3823 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Unless we have a proven replacement(s) lined up, we should reject all offers. |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:33 - Aug 10 with 3818 views | itfcjoe |
No point selling him, due to salary cap we can't replace him |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:34 - Aug 10 with 3805 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:32 - Aug 10 by JakeITFC |
There doesn't seem much value in selling any player with a wage higher than the average League One salary atm, does there? |
Nope, but he'll say he wants to leave for 'personal reasons' and we'll give him away.  | |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:36 - Aug 10 with 3791 views | J2BLUE |
Unless there is some sort of complex deal it would be stupid to sell him when it would only free up a tiny wage. |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:45 - Aug 10 with 3714 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:33 - Aug 10 by itfcjoe |
No point selling him, due to salary cap we can't replace him |
I'm thinking Kayden Jackson is now starting questioning his agents advice to turn down a new deal?
.....no scope for us to improve it now, and limited incentive for us to sell to a Championship side. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:48 - Aug 10 with 3688 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:36 - Aug 10 by J2BLUE |
Unless there is some sort of complex deal it would be stupid to sell him when it would only free up a tiny wage. |
I might be wrong, but it looks to all intents and purposes that Jacksons agent is hawking him about the Championship and from Jackson's quote - "Whatever is going on is separate to everything. I don’t really deal too much on that side, it’s down to the agent."
I'd say he knows that his agent is talking to clubs too.
If he's got his head elsewhere, I'd rather he not be here personally. | |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:51 - Aug 10 with 3661 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:48 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
I might be wrong, but it looks to all intents and purposes that Jacksons agent is hawking him about the Championship and from Jackson's quote - "Whatever is going on is separate to everything. I don’t really deal too much on that side, it’s down to the agent."
I'd say he knows that his agent is talking to clubs too.
If he's got his head elsewhere, I'd rather he not be here personally. |
His agent has f*cked up timing wise. | |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:52 - Aug 10 with 3652 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:45 - Aug 10 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I'm thinking Kayden Jackson is now starting questioning his agents advice to turn down a new deal?
.....no scope for us to improve it now, and limited incentive for us to sell to a Championship side. |
Unfortunately if the player wants to move on and earn a lot more than he can do here, there is little Town can do.
As you say, he will no longer get an improved contract here, so best all round we sell and get as much as we can for him.
We COULD refuse to sell, but that would not benefit anyone and an unhappy player would affect the whole squad.
Get rid. |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:53 - Aug 10 with 3637 views | Coco |
Haven't Brum pulled in about 50M over the last 2 years? Take some of that. |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:56 - Aug 10 with 3614 views | itfcjoe |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:48 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
I might be wrong, but it looks to all intents and purposes that Jacksons agent is hawking him about the Championship and from Jackson's quote - "Whatever is going on is separate to everything. I don’t really deal too much on that side, it’s down to the agent."
I'd say he knows that his agent is talking to clubs too.
If he's got his head elsewhere, I'd rather he not be here personally. |
He hasn't though - he's happy to stay | |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:02 - Aug 10 with 3566 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:52 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy |
Unfortunately if the player wants to move on and earn a lot more than he can do here, there is little Town can do.
As you say, he will no longer get an improved contract here, so best all round we sell and get as much as we can for him.
We COULD refuse to sell, but that would not benefit anyone and an unhappy player would affect the whole squad.
Get rid. |
We are in a situation where we may not be able to buy a replacement.
Refuse to sell if that's the case, like we did with McGoldrick.
Only sell if it suits the club. We should learn for the summer of 2018. | |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:04 - Aug 10 with 3553 views | PhilTWTD |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:48 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
I might be wrong, but it looks to all intents and purposes that Jacksons agent is hawking him about the Championship and from Jackson's quote - "Whatever is going on is separate to everything. I don’t really deal too much on that side, it’s down to the agent."
I'd say he knows that his agent is talking to clubs too.
If he's got his head elsewhere, I'd rather he not be here personally. |
Rather than hawking as such, the agent may be trying to generate interest to get increased terms - from what I'm told he's on a lot less than Norwood - but I don't think there's a genuine clamour from Championship clubs, aside from Blackburn having a look in January. As others have said, we can't sell him at the moment as we'd not be able to replace him. |  | | |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:05 - Aug 10 with 3541 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:56 - Aug 10 by itfcjoe |
He hasn't though - he's happy to stay |
Has he said that?
I haven't found the "I'm going nowhere" press conference at all | |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:06 - Aug 10 with 3532 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:04 - Aug 10 by PhilTWTD |
Rather than hawking as such, the agent may be trying to generate interest to get increased terms - from what I'm told he's on a lot less than Norwood - but I don't think there's a genuine clamour from Championship clubs, aside from Blackburn having a look in January. As others have said, we can't sell him at the moment as we'd not be able to replace him. |
Isn't it unlikely that he'll see increased terms now though? | |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:07 - Aug 10 with 3526 views | JakeITFC |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:04 - Aug 10 by PhilTWTD |
Rather than hawking as such, the agent may be trying to generate interest to get increased terms - from what I'm told he's on a lot less than Norwood - but I don't think there's a genuine clamour from Championship clubs, aside from Blackburn having a look in January. As others have said, we can't sell him at the moment as we'd not be able to replace him. |
New agent apparently. | | | |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:10 - Aug 10 with 3507 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:04 - Aug 10 by PhilTWTD |
Rather than hawking as such, the agent may be trying to generate interest to get increased terms - from what I'm told he's on a lot less than Norwood - but I don't think there's a genuine clamour from Championship clubs, aside from Blackburn having a look in January. As others have said, we can't sell him at the moment as we'd not be able to replace him. |
Someone needs to tell his agent about this salary cap thingy.
Also, someone needs to explain to his agent;
We paid a huge fee for Jackson, so less money available to wages.
Norwood was a free, so pockets a bigger wage packet.
It's all very simple football economics.
[Post edited 10 Aug 2020 16:12]
| |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:11 - Aug 10 with 3496 views | Steve_M |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 15:33 - Aug 10 by itfcjoe |
No point selling him, due to salary cap we can't replace him |
We'll need to wait and find out when the transfer deadline is before selling him two days beforehand like we did with Murphy. |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:14 - Aug 10 with 3473 views | PhilTWTD |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:06 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Isn't it unlikely that he'll see increased terms now though? |
Yes, not sure the implications of the cap have been fully understood by a lot of people, wouldn't surprise me if agents were among them, not least as the £113,000 average figure is higher than had been anticipated.
The best chance he has of getting a better deal is Town getting promoted.
This post has been edited by an administrator | | | |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:14 - Aug 10 with 3461 views | itfcjoe |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:05 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Has he said that?
I haven't found the "I'm going nowhere" press conference at all |
You realise it isn't black and white?
Just because he wants more money, or would be interested in a move doesn't mean he is desperate to go and won't be happy if he does stay.
Using our attitude any time a player has their head turned by interest we'd get rid and end up with no one | |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:16 - Aug 10 with 3436 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
Would have sold him prior to salary cap.
No point anymore as you wouldn't replace to the same level. |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:48 - Aug 10 with 3287 views | ArnieM |
Why take less than we paid for him when he was a League Tel player ? This kind of approach is what makes Town so poor In the transfer market these days .
Pay top dollar for incoming players in either fee or wages
Let good players leave ( allow contracts to run down ) and get sod all for them, you don’t see scum do this very often . We’re always doing it ! |  |
| |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 17:02 - Aug 10 with 3204 views | allezlesbleus |
| If either Stoke or Brum offer anywhere near £1.6million on 16:48 - Aug 10 by ArnieM |
Why take less than we paid for him when he was a League Tel player ? This kind of approach is what makes Town so poor In the transfer market these days .
Pay top dollar for incoming players in either fee or wages
Let good players leave ( allow contracts to run down ) and get sod all for them, you don’t see scum do this very often . We’re always doing it ! |
I agree.
For a successful businessman, ME has had a very poor record in this department. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
