| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? 11:00 - Apr 12 with 1009 views | chrismakin |
Overall Saturday wasnt bad. Cant really see any other players who could contribute more being available.
Edit.. sorry didnt see the nors. KVY story
In this case. Easy swaps to make [Post edited 12 Apr 2021 11:04]
|  |
| |  |
| So tomorrow. Unchanged side? on 11:01 - Apr 12 with 993 views | GavTWTD |
Not with Norwood and KVY being available. |  |
| |
| So tomorrow. Unchanged side? on 11:02 - Apr 12 with 983 views | chrismakin |
| So tomorrow. Unchanged side? on 11:01 - Apr 12 by GavTWTD |
Not with Norwood and KVY being available. |
Oooooo of course if they're back they play | |
| |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:08 - Apr 12 with 940 views | Coastalblue |
Not bad?
Really? |  |
| |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:09 - Apr 12 with 930 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
Norwood will start over Drinan surely |  | | |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:09 - Apr 12 with 928 views | chrismakin |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:08 - Apr 12 by Coastalblue |
Not bad?
Really? |
Yes really. Not enough to make changes for changes sake. | |
| |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:12 - Apr 12 with 902 views | Vaughan8 |
I didn't watch it but hearing from people and reading on here, I don't think many people think it "wasn't bad".
We had no shots on target, only 7 shots in total. They had 13 (5 on target).
Also we apparently had 33.8% possession. I know stats can be misleading but they don't read great.
(all stats from sky sports..........I hold no responsibility for the accuracy!) |  | | |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:34 - Apr 12 with 819 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:09 - Apr 12 by chrismakin |
Yes really. Not enough to make changes for changes sake. |
How exactly is ZERO shots on target against MK Dons at home "not too bad"?!
But yeah Nors for Drinan and KVY for Woolfie, although I'd rather Woolfie partnered Nsialla at CB myself. |  |
| |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:36 - Apr 12 with 815 views | chrismakin |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:12 - Apr 12 by Vaughan8 |
I didn't watch it but hearing from people and reading on here, I don't think many people think it "wasn't bad".
We had no shots on target, only 7 shots in total. They had 13 (5 on target).
Also we apparently had 33.8% possession. I know stats can be misleading but they don't read great.
(all stats from sky sports..........I hold no responsibility for the accuracy!) |
And MK dons have dominated games with the ball alot this season, just because we're Ipswich doesn't mean that would suddenly change.
Even when they played Hull and lost 1-3 in November they had possession 65% over 35% as an example. MK dons also had 12 shots to Hulls 8, both sides had 4 on target
yesturday MK dons possession 67% ipswich 33% Shots MK Dons 13 to Ipswich 7
Difference was 0 ipswich shots on target..
So just taken a comparison from that game, Hull had 1 more shot than us, but actually had 4 on target. But were beaten on stats exactly the same as we were.
Copied an pasted the above from one of my posts last night. MK Dons are 4th in the form table The 0 Shots on target doesn't help paint an actual picture. compared to Rochdale, Northampton fixtures... Saturday wasn't as bad [Post edited 12 Apr 2021 11:39]
| |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:37 - Apr 12 with 802 views | chrismakin |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:34 - Apr 12 by Wallingford_Boy |
How exactly is ZERO shots on target against MK Dons at home "not too bad"?!
But yeah Nors for Drinan and KVY for Woolfie, although I'd rather Woolfie partnered Nsialla at CB myself. |
Because we did actually create some opportunities, we did actually play some nice football and we did actually play some nice football from the back too. It wasn't all 'Bad' not enough imo to go making changes for the sake of it.
Norwood in is a given, KVY if ok to start too, apart from that, I don't see what you could do that would positively effect things further. | |
| |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:40 - Apr 12 with 778 views | Parky |
Holy
KVY
Toto
Chambers
Ward
Downes
Dozzell
Edwards
Bishop
Dobra
Norwood
I’d be very happy with that! | | | |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:50 - Apr 12 with 729 views | itfc1108 |
I would rest Dozzell.
It's a shame that Nydam isn't probably ready to start, because he and Downes as the midfield 2, would allow Paul Cook to go back to 4231.
I think I would then have Bishop, Parrott and Dobra behind Norwood. [Post edited 12 Apr 2021 11:54]
| | | |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:52 - Apr 12 with 711 views | JammyDodgerrr |
I would be surprised if Nydam didn't start given Cook has mentioned him. Just not sure whether it would be at left back or in midfield. And assuming we stay the same formation.
Holy
Woolf Chambers Nsiala Nydam
Bishop Downes Doz Edwards
Dobra
Norwood |  |
| |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:55 - Apr 12 with 677 views | Garv |
It wasn't as bad as some of the 0-0s we've had. Tell you what though, considering we're meant to be a technical side MK Dons showed us how to be positive with the ball. We were there for the taking during the last 10-15 mins, they should have been disappointed with a draw. |  |
| |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 12:13 - Apr 12 with 617 views | pointofblue |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 11:40 - Apr 12 by Parky |
Holy
KVY
Toto
Chambers
Ward
Downes
Dozzell
Edwards
Bishop
Dobra
Norwood
I’d be very happy with that! |
Hope we have learned our lesson about rushing players back - bring KVY and Norwood on at subs at the very most. | |
| |
| So tomorrows side.. mainly unchanged? on 12:46 - Apr 12 with 550 views | GlasgowBlue |
I stopped reading after "Overall Saturday wasn't bad". |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
