| Commentary 15:03 - Aug 6 with 6116 views | Grammarman |
I appreciate that it is early doors, but this iPlayer commentary is very poor.
|  | | |  |
| Commentary on 15:04 - Aug 6 with 3886 views | DublinBlue84 |
To be fair, it was pretty confusing to me if he gave a penalty there or not also and I didn't have any sound on initially and it looked like a clear foul by Burgess. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 15:04]
| |
| |
| Commentary on 15:05 - Aug 6 with 3856 views | ZXBlue |
| Commentary on 15:04 - Aug 6 by DublinBlue84 |
To be fair, it was pretty confusing to me if he gave a penalty there or not also and I didn't have any sound on initially and it looked like a clear foul by Burgess. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 15:04]
|
In fairness, there was a slip which resulted in an accidental but nasty slide on Davis, followed by a foul that could easly have ebeen a penalty, and the ref then pointed to the spot. But seemingly was actually pointing at the location of the slip, very belatedly. | | | |
| Commentary on 15:13 - Aug 6 with 3786 views | Grammarman |
This is really dire. It sounds like they have employed someone to talk about football who has no understanding of it. FFS they are now talking about the scenery! | | | |
| Commentary on 15:17 - Aug 6 with 3740 views | Cotty |
| Commentary on 15:13 - Aug 6 by Grammarman |
This is really dire. It sounds like they have employed someone to talk about football who has no understanding of it. FFS they are now talking about the scenery! |
Yeah it’s abysmal. The forest green commentary is much better. |  | | |
| Commentary on 15:18 - Aug 6 with 3721 views | Keno |
| Commentary on 15:13 - Aug 6 by Grammarman |
This is really dire. It sounds like they have employed someone to talk about football who has no understanding of it. FFS they are now talking about the scenery! |
I follow audio by Keno 1 Aug 2022 17:32I am shocked that my email wasnt personally written by Mr Nash!!!
|  |
| |
| Commentary on 15:22 - Aug 6 with 3672 views | Illinoisblue |
| Commentary on 15:13 - Aug 6 by Grammarman |
This is really dire. It sounds like they have employed someone to talk about football who has no understanding of it. FFS they are now talking about the scenery! |
He’s not very good. He just referred to us as “the away side”. What’s wrong with Town, Ipswich or We? |  |
| |
| Commentary on 15:25 - Aug 6 with 3627 views | smithy91 |
Agreed. Tuned in expecting a big improvement following fan feedback and club response but its still not great.
Reminds me of ITVs Matterface, commentary is a bit dry. Lacks Brenners enthusiasm, as much as that annoys some of us!
Surely they will have to bring back the Suffolk lot for radio only, can see the club receiving lot of complaints. |  | | |
| Commentary on 15:26 - Aug 6 with 3600 views | GlasgowBlue |
I think it's fine. Not as frantic as the radio commentary being dubbed over the top of the video.
It's also in sync, which the radio commentary never was. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 15:27]
|  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Commentary on 15:31 - Aug 6 with 3537 views | aeldun |
The club noted that they’d reminded the main commentator that he should provide more match description, as there were audio-only iFollow listeners. But there’s still very little description of where the players are on the pitch, so there’s very little sense of where the action is happening. | | | |
| Commentary on 15:35 - Aug 6 with 3474 views | Cotty |
| Commentary on 15:26 - Aug 6 by GlasgowBlue |
I think it's fine. Not as frantic as the radio commentary being dubbed over the top of the video.
It's also in sync, which the radio commentary never was. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 15:27]
|
It’s terrible for audio only. | | | |
| Commentary on 15:35 - Aug 6 with 3468 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Commentary on 15:31 - Aug 6 by aeldun |
The club noted that they’d reminded the main commentator that he should provide more match description, as there were audio-only iFollow listeners. But there’s still very little description of where the players are on the pitch, so there’s very little sense of where the action is happening. |
Brenner has mentioned the New Lawn a few times so we know. |  |
| |
| Commentary on 15:35 - Aug 6 with 3459 views | Illinoisblue |
And there it is - the plug for ITFC shop.com | |
| |
| Commentary on 15:37 - Aug 6 with 3428 views | balcombeblue |
| Commentary on 15:04 - Aug 6 by DublinBlue84 |
To be fair, it was pretty confusing to me if he gave a penalty there or not also and I didn't have any sound on initially and it looked like a clear foul by Burgess. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 15:04]
|
Is there anyway at all of getting radio suffolk back on of you lo
Live outside the county?
May have to get my dad to share through a zoom call or something | | | |
| Commentary on 15:37 - Aug 6 with 3416 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Commentary on 15:35 - Aug 6 by Cotty |
It’s terrible for audio only. |
Yeah I can imagine. Very much tailored for watching. | |
| |
| Commentary on 15:38 - Aug 6 with 3408 views | Keno |
| Commentary on 15:37 - Aug 6 by GlasgowBlue |
Yeah I can imagine. Very much tailored for watching. |
how the hell did they suddenly nearly score
I miss Brenner | |
| |
| Commentary on 15:41 - Aug 6 with 3360 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Commentary on 15:38 - Aug 6 by Keno |
how the hell did they suddenly nearly score
I miss Brenner |
I miss Mick Mills honesty.
You won't get that from a current player. | |
| |
| Commentary on 16:03 - Aug 6 with 3305 views | X0Y0 |
Very poor - I don’t want to be too harsh, given they are part of the set up and possible fans, but they don’t offer anywhere near the level of insight that they do on Radio Suffolk. I don’t think there was a single discussion about tactics or formations in that half, and I learnt absolutely nothing about Forest Green, except they play in green and have a pink goalkeeper kit. Far too much inane conversation.
Whilst I appreciate having players on is novel, most of them have no radio training and they’re never going to offer an objective or particularly interesting view …. ‘So Nick, how’s Davis looked in training?’ ‘Complete sh*te to be honest. Hope we kept the receipt as he mostly turns up late and couldn’t hit a barn door with a banjo’ … not going to happen is it.
The club need to offer the option of radio Suffolk or club commentary, and both should be available to radio and video. They could then monitor the listening numbers to measure which is actually the success. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 16:07]
| | | |
| Commentary on 16:06 - Aug 6 with 3267 views | Adelaideblue |
| Commentary on 16:03 - Aug 6 by X0Y0 |
Very poor - I don’t want to be too harsh, given they are part of the set up and possible fans, but they don’t offer anywhere near the level of insight that they do on Radio Suffolk. I don’t think there was a single discussion about tactics or formations in that half, and I learnt absolutely nothing about Forest Green, except they play in green and have a pink goalkeeper kit. Far too much inane conversation.
Whilst I appreciate having players on is novel, most of them have no radio training and they’re never going to offer an objective or particularly interesting view …. ‘So Nick, how’s Davis looked in training?’ ‘Complete sh*te to be honest. Hope we kept the receipt as he mostly turns up late and couldn’t hit a barn door with a banjo’ … not going to happen is it.
The club need to offer the option of radio Suffolk or club commentary, and both should be available to radio and video. They could then monitor the listening numbers to measure which is actually the success. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 16:07]
|
Any one else really not liking our commentary... sounds so amateur... | | | |
| Commentary on 16:10 - Aug 6 with 3225 views | BromleyBloo |
| Commentary on 16:06 - Aug 6 by Adelaideblue |
Any one else really not liking our commentary... sounds so amateur... |
Bring back Brenner and Mick M asap - Mick’s dour analysis was great!!! |  | | |
| Commentary on 16:11 - Aug 6 with 3215 views | Strimmer |
| Commentary on 16:03 - Aug 6 by X0Y0 |
Very poor - I don’t want to be too harsh, given they are part of the set up and possible fans, but they don’t offer anywhere near the level of insight that they do on Radio Suffolk. I don’t think there was a single discussion about tactics or formations in that half, and I learnt absolutely nothing about Forest Green, except they play in green and have a pink goalkeeper kit. Far too much inane conversation.
Whilst I appreciate having players on is novel, most of them have no radio training and they’re never going to offer an objective or particularly interesting view …. ‘So Nick, how’s Davis looked in training?’ ‘Complete sh*te to be honest. Hope we kept the receipt as he mostly turns up late and couldn’t hit a barn door with a banjo’ … not going to happen is it.
The club need to offer the option of radio Suffolk or club commentary, and both should be available to radio and video. They could then monitor the listening numbers to measure which is actually the success. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 16:07]
|
with you on all points here. Did they even tell us if we're unchanged at the start of the half? amateurish, literally | |
| |
| Commentary on 16:13 - Aug 6 with 3191 views | DublinBlue84 |
| Commentary on 16:03 - Aug 6 by X0Y0 |
Very poor - I don’t want to be too harsh, given they are part of the set up and possible fans, but they don’t offer anywhere near the level of insight that they do on Radio Suffolk. I don’t think there was a single discussion about tactics or formations in that half, and I learnt absolutely nothing about Forest Green, except they play in green and have a pink goalkeeper kit. Far too much inane conversation.
Whilst I appreciate having players on is novel, most of them have no radio training and they’re never going to offer an objective or particularly interesting view …. ‘So Nick, how’s Davis looked in training?’ ‘Complete sh*te to be honest. Hope we kept the receipt as he mostly turns up late and couldn’t hit a barn door with a banjo’ … not going to happen is it.
The club need to offer the option of radio Suffolk or club commentary, and both should be available to radio and video. They could then monitor the listening numbers to measure which is actually the success. [Post edited 6 Aug 2022 16:07]
|
I don't think the ifollow platform allows for different commentary feeds for both, it might be an option next year when it's taken in house. | |
| |
| Commentary on 16:14 - Aug 6 with 3173 views | BlueBadger |
| Commentary on 15:13 - Aug 6 by Grammarman |
This is really dire. It sounds like they have employed someone to talk about football who has no understanding of it. FFS they are now talking about the scenery! |
Anyone know how Cruncher is spending his Saturday afternoons? |  |
| |
| Commentary on 16:22 - Aug 6 with 3112 views | jeera |
| Commentary on 15:13 - Aug 6 by Grammarman |
This is really dire. It sounds like they have employed someone to talk about football who has no understanding of it. FFS they are now talking about the scenery! |
Although tbf if there was a side competition for scenery at each ground this one would definitely be up there. |  |
| |
| Commentary on 16:24 - Aug 6 with 3090 views | Ryorry |
"No perspiration from us up here in the commentary box I can tell you".
That's the level. |  |
| |
| Commentary on 16:25 - Aug 6 with 3083 views | GeoffSentence |
| Commentary on 15:25 - Aug 6 by smithy91 |
Agreed. Tuned in expecting a big improvement following fan feedback and club response but its still not great.
Reminds me of ITVs Matterface, commentary is a bit dry. Lacks Brenners enthusiasm, as much as that annoys some of us!
Surely they will have to bring back the Suffolk lot for radio only, can see the club receiving lot of complaints. |
Th trouble with Brenner's enthusiasm, is that he sometimes gets a little too enthusiastic about ur oppostition.
That might be because we have been utter sh1te since he started commentating I suppose. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
