| Farage horrible winker part 6795 21:57 - Jul 31 with 5243 views | reusersfreekicks |
More and more is showing his true colours. More obvious and overtly racist and no longer any pretence of anything else. And trying to stir the sh1t as much as possible without caring who gets hurt.
Odious fecking c@nt |  | | |  |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:24 - Aug 1 with 838 views | itfcjoe |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 23:32 - Jul 31 by LuciBlue |
I would feel the same whichever politician asked. I don't dismiss the question because I may generally disagree with the person asking it. |
As an example, Farage knows full well that the media can't report on the attacker to identify him as he's U18, so when he says, are they hiding things he knows full well that they aren't, that it is just standard procedure - but yet by 'just asking the question' he is deliberately planting that in people's heads that they are doing so |  |
| |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:26 - Aug 1 with 835 views | eireblue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 01:10 - Aug 1 by LuciBlue |
You win, whatever competition it was. Can't remember saying Farage is a lovely bloke, just that there are questions to be asked and answered uncluttered by political leaning. |
“..there were reports of…”
Was a false statement in Farage’s question.
There weren’t reports, there was a rumour on Twitter from an account that had less credibility than someone suggesting Messi was about to join ITFC.
It’s not about winning, it’s about not getting misguided by grifters and racists.
Farage was being despicable. |  | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:27 - Aug 1 with 834 views | Europablue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 23:07 - Jul 31 by Blueschev |
Maybe you should offer the same advice to Farage? |
So your answer is that we just accept what authority figures say and don't question anything?
Or is it just that you don't like the person that is saying something rather than what he is saying? Do we all have to go through you before we can speak.
There isn't anything vaguely controversial in what he said. It's like you believe that there is a group of us who have a secret code where we say very reasonable things in public, but we are really signaling the start of the fourth Reich. Tin foil sales must be booming where you live. |  | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:38 - Aug 1 with 793 views | Europablue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 23:44 - Jul 31 by MattinLondon |
He said before that they were just misguided. If they were brown or black and attacked a church I’m sure his response wouldn’t have been so understanding.
Make of that what you will. |
Look at what you are doing. You are talking about someone you don't know and projecting what you want their reaction to be to a hypothetical situation. You sound like a dog-whistling hate preacher. It's a pattern that is often repeated by far left people on her and it is led by feelings over facts. In this case some far right people have let themselves be led by feelings over facts. The feelings don't come from nowhere in either case, but they need to be examined and not just blindly reacted to.
You should go into public discourse and judge people on their words not what you hope them to be to confirm your biases otherwise you are just stoking division. | | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:42 - Aug 1 with 778 views | Europablue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 00:01 - Aug 1 by eireblue |
Yea, some of them were so misguided, instead of expressing concern, they broke into a shop and stole booze and fags.
I bet they were kicking themselves the next day, “Baz, Baz, I just remembered, we forgot to express condolences to the victims and thank the police that arrested that guy, we looted a shop, got drunk and had a fight, how misguided were we last night hey” |
There are always opportunists who use legitimate public anger that should be directed into protests and riot and ransack. It doesn't really need examples because it is so common.
Those people need to be punished to the full extent of the law. | | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:47 - Aug 1 with 764 views | Europablue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 00:06 - Aug 1 by MattinLondon |
I must be really boring because when I’m bored or pissed, I don’t shout vile slogans or destroy things or other people’s property. I must change my ways - pass me the special brew, point me in the direction of an off-licence and I’ll smash it up. |
Don't get me wrong, people need to take responsibility for their actions. Having said that the majority on here are speaking from a position of immense privilege being that most have been brought up in good loving environments and probably not in incredibly deprived areas with gangs and all that.
There should be efforts to rehabilitate these people as well as punishing them for their bad behaviour. The social problems won't just go away if we ignore them or demonize people. | | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:52 - Aug 1 with 751 views | Europablue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 00:18 - Aug 1 by factual_blue |
Too young to vote then? I'm working on the level of intellect you're displaying. [Post edited 1 Aug 2024 0:24]
|
There should be a flag for name calling with no substance. Is your own argument so poor that you can't help but resort to name calling? Try not express yourself so emotionally, it's probably something you will grow out of.
Do you believe that the voting age should be lowered? If anything, I would agree with you that some people are not emotionally developed enough to vote. | | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:57 - Aug 1 with 741 views | Europablue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 00:42 - Aug 1 by LuciBlue |
By such politicians I assume you mean any politician, then the answer is at least 'contempt'.
I also feel I can look at the questions being asked without being clouded by my feelings towards the asker. |
It's nice to see someone on here that doesn't get all emotional and call people names. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:02 - Aug 1 with 725 views | positivity |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:52 - Aug 1 by Europablue |
There should be a flag for name calling with no substance. Is your own argument so poor that you can't help but resort to name calling? Try not express yourself so emotionally, it's probably something you will grow out of.
Do you believe that the voting age should be lowered? If anything, I would agree with you that some people are not emotionally developed enough to vote. |
now you're gatekeeping about voting.
would your test for emotional development include the ability to tell the difference between islamophobia/anti-semitism and "being rude about religion"? | |
| |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:06 - Aug 1 with 707 views | Europablue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:24 - Aug 1 by itfcjoe |
As an example, Farage knows full well that the media can't report on the attacker to identify him as he's U18, so when he says, are they hiding things he knows full well that they aren't, that it is just standard procedure - but yet by 'just asking the question' he is deliberately planting that in people's heads that they are doing so |
Did they answer whether the suspect was under surveillance? Have they released enough general details aside from it not being investigated as a terror incident.
You also cannot view this as an isolated incident. The police have lost our trust over years. The reaction is not rational and also not acceptable. | | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:25 - Aug 1 with 667 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 01:10 - Aug 1 by LuciBlue |
You win, whatever competition it was. Can't remember saying Farage is a lovely bloke, just that there are questions to be asked and answered uncluttered by political leaning. |
Just asking questions.
These are questions that appeal to confirmation bias. It’s gone beyond dog whistling now. Its all out agenda setting. |  |
| |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:44 - Aug 1 with 635 views | Blueschev |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:27 - Aug 1 by Europablue |
So your answer is that we just accept what authority figures say and don't question anything?
Or is it just that you don't like the person that is saying something rather than what he is saying? Do we all have to go through you before we can speak.
There isn't anything vaguely controversial in what he said. It's like you believe that there is a group of us who have a secret code where we say very reasonable things in public, but we are really signaling the start of the fourth Reich. Tin foil sales must be booming where you live. |
The fact that you pretend not to know what Farage was was up to in order to prove your ever shifting point makes engaging with you in a debate essentially pointless. [Post edited 1 Aug 2024 9:45]
|  | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:57 - Aug 1 with 604 views | giant_stow |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:25 - Aug 1 by GlasgowBlue |
Just asking questions.
These are questions that appeal to confirmation bias. It’s gone beyond dog whistling now. Its all out agenda setting. |
At least they're showing their hand now, I spose. |  |
| |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:57 - Aug 1 with 602 views | Europablue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:02 - Aug 1 by positivity |
now you're gatekeeping about voting.
would your test for emotional development include the ability to tell the difference between islamophobia/anti-semitism and "being rude about religion"? |
No, I was challenging another person to clarify a potential inconsistency.
Obviously you can't set a test for whether someone is intelligent or informed enough to be deserving of a vote.
I do believe that we have extended childhood for middle class people, so maybe just leave voting as it is, but only allow the vote after you have finished university. | | | |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 10:04 - Aug 1 with 587 views | Whos_blue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 08:47 - Aug 1 by Europablue |
Don't get me wrong, people need to take responsibility for their actions. Having said that the majority on here are speaking from a position of immense privilege being that most have been brought up in good loving environments and probably not in incredibly deprived areas with gangs and all that.
There should be efforts to rehabilitate these people as well as punishing them for their bad behaviour. The social problems won't just go away if we ignore them or demonize people. |
You make some good observations here, but we're still swerving the issue that a mosque was attacked and Islamaphobic chants were shouted.
I understand that those who feel left behind will be angry and want to react. However, the protest was put together in reaction to false information regarding the race/religion of the attacker and the fact they may have been a migrant. Stop the boats was another chant heard.
The behaviour of the mob was inexcusable and I'm struggling to find any angle where I might even try to understand how their feelings of disaffection somehow legitmise their appalling actions.
Bearing in mind the "enough is enough" trouble in London, the narrative is not about unemployment. It's about taking the country back. And we know that is a narrative Farage and others have consistently pushed.
I don't understand how people are fooled in thinking this unrest is about anything else. [Post edited 1 Aug 2024 10:32]
|  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 10:05 - Aug 1 with 584 views | positivity |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:57 - Aug 1 by Europablue |
No, I was challenging another person to clarify a potential inconsistency.
Obviously you can't set a test for whether someone is intelligent or informed enough to be deserving of a vote.
I do believe that we have extended childhood for middle class people, so maybe just leave voting as it is, but only allow the vote after you have finished university. |
that's complete idiocy, only allow votes to older people and the less-educated?
speaking of education, have you educated yourself about the difference between islamophobia/anti-semitism and "being rude about religion" yet? | |
| |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 10:08 - Aug 1 with 575 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:25 - Aug 1 by GlasgowBlue |
Just asking questions.
These are questions that appeal to confirmation bias. It’s gone beyond dog whistling now. Its all out agenda setting. |
I'm not convinced it's not another Blueas 'comedy' creation (sorry Blues if not!). MalcomMeatballHead was far funnier. |  |
| |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 10:44 - Aug 1 with 492 views | itfcjoe |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 09:06 - Aug 1 by Europablue |
Did they answer whether the suspect was under surveillance? Have they released enough general details aside from it not being investigated as a terror incident.
You also cannot view this as an isolated incident. The police have lost our trust over years. The reaction is not rational and also not acceptable. |
It's an active investigation where there are laws in place to protect identities - there is no need to find this info out for anyone but the investigating officers at this stage, as long as there isn't deemed any threat to the wider populace.
Farage knows this, but he is just trying to stoke it up because he is amplifying 'reports' from the same places as Andrew Tate, Tommy Robinson and the like which they know aren't from reliable sources | |
| |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 13:29 - Aug 1 with 387 views | Eireannach_gorm |
| Farage horrible winker part 6795 on 22:15 - Jul 31 by LuciBlue |
Which parts in particular?
Seems like obvious observations and questions to me. |
You also have genuine concerns? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
