| 11,204 22:57 - Dec 16 with 5164 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
You'd be forgiven for thinking that was the attendance for a League 1 game. But that was a Premier League attendance, tonight, Bournemouth v Wet Spam. Astonishing.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |  |
| 11,204 on 09:38 - Dec 17 with 736 views | Stewart27 |
| 11,204 on 09:20 - Dec 17 by trncbluearmy |
Average gate during that time was 17746 |
“Officially”
Anyway I was using the Bournemouth recent gate to make my point. |  | | |
| 11,204 on 09:40 - Dec 17 with 746 views | Trequartista |
| 11,204 on 08:09 - Dec 17 by NthQldITFC |
Thread mode? Methynks thou hast not, perchance, yet entyrred ye era of Moderne Tellaycomunicayshuns, mine Deere Friend? |
I've tried them both and Thread Mode suits me better. I can see who is replying to whom more clearly and if a thread has 50 youtube videos on it, I don't have to load them all. |  |
| |
| TABLE VIEW WALKS ON WATER, LA LA LA LA LA, LA LA LA LA on 09:54 - Dec 17 with 716 views | Guthrum |
| TABLE VIEW WALKS ON WATER, LA LA LA LA LA, LA LA LA LA on 06:07 - Dec 17 by WeWereZombies |
On the other hand I have at last found a way to confirm that I am viewing in table mode (got no issues looking at all the posts in a nice neat chronological order, sensible.)
So Table Mode 1 Thread View 0, 'cos that's the way I see it...(this post is in table view, isn't it?) [Post edited 17 Dec 2024 6:26]
|
Not for me it isn't.
Find it much easier to follow long, multi-branch discussions using thread view. Especially seeing who has replied to who. Plus the lack of boxes and avatars makes the screen less crowded. On the other hand, very evtended threads sometimes disappear off the right hand side of the screen and are lost in the blue. |  |
| |
| 11,204 on 09:54 - Dec 17 with 712 views | Trequartista |
| 11,204 on 06:19 - Dec 17 by GavTWTD |
I've done so.
Yes it's definitely a bug but I wish people would be more descriptive with subject titles. Not only does it help people here make a more informed decision whether to open a thread but it also helps the thread get interest from Google.
But yes, DEFINITELY a bug. |
Thank you. | |
| |
| 11,204 on 09:55 - Dec 17 with 710 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| 11,204 on 09:03 - Dec 17 by Stewart27 |
Gate receipts are a drop in the ocean when it comes to FFP. It’s nice to have a big ground to enable more fans to support the team and create a little more commercial revenue. But the real money comes through tv and sponsorship.
This crowd thing annoys me a little. 11,204 was our average gate under MM in the dark days and we had a 30k stadium. Now all of a sudden we’re billy big b0ll0cks because we’re selling out our ground. Not really sure what people are expecting Bournemouth to do? |
eh? Nobody's being billy big b0ll0cks, it's just a surprisingly low crowd for a Prem game in this day and age (and not at full capacity). We were towards the lower reaches of the Championship under MM (and that Bournemouth gate is nowhere near our average either). [Post edited 17 Dec 2024 9:58]
| |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| 11,204 on 09:57 - Dec 17 with 709 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| 11,204 on 09:38 - Dec 17 by Stewart27 |
“Officially”
Anyway I was using the Bournemouth recent gate to make my point. |
Well it's a terrible point. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| 11,204 on 10:32 - Dec 17 with 651 views | Radlett_blue |
| 11,204 on 09:29 - Dec 17 by MattinLondon |
Huge investment to get them there but once they reached the summit they have the riches of Sky to spend and invest. Gate receipts will just be a nice top-up. |
As long as you stay in the Premier League (or bounce back though parachute payments). |  |
| |
| 11,204 on 11:09 - Dec 17 with 606 views | Swansea_Blue |
| 11,204 on 08:09 - Dec 17 by NthQldITFC |
Thread mode? Methynks thou hast not, perchance, yet entyrred ye era of Moderne Tellaycomunicayshuns, mine Deere Friend? |
The problem with table mode is I lose track of any replies. But then thread mode is used by reprobates. It’s a conundrum  |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| 11,204 on 11:37 - Dec 17 with 572 views | farkenhell |
| 11,204 on 09:29 - Dec 17 by MattinLondon |
Huge investment to get them there but once they reached the summit they have the riches of Sky to spend and invest. Gate receipts will just be a nice top-up. |
They've also bought and sold well, and have an excellent manager. | | | |
| 11,204 on 11:44 - Dec 17 with 557 views | MattinLondon |
| 11,204 on 11:37 - Dec 17 by farkenhell |
They've also bought and sold well, and have an excellent manager. |
Yes, indeed. Never understood the negative attitude some posters have towards them. Yes, they’ve spent money but that doesn’t mean successful promotions. Derby failed miserably as did we in the early days of Marcus Evans - and that was when having money was much more of an advantage. |  | | |
| 11,204 on 11:53 - Dec 17 with 550 views | farkenhell |
| 11,204 on 11:44 - Dec 17 by MattinLondon |
Yes, indeed. Never understood the negative attitude some posters have towards them. Yes, they’ve spent money but that doesn’t mean successful promotions. Derby failed miserably as did we in the early days of Marcus Evans - and that was when having money was much more of an advantage. |
They cheated (broke the financial rules) to get to the PL, so I can understand why some are dismissive towards them. However, unlike some other clubs, they accepted the punishment that was given to them. They took a risk and it paid off for them. It didn't for others. | | | |
| 11,204 on 12:39 - Dec 17 with 512 views | Sharkey |
| 11,204 on 11:44 - Dec 17 by MattinLondon |
Yes, indeed. Never understood the negative attitude some posters have towards them. Yes, they’ve spent money but that doesn’t mean successful promotions. Derby failed miserably as did we in the early days of Marcus Evans - and that was when having money was much more of an advantage. |
I guess pre-season, Bournemouth (along with Forest) were among the clubs that people hoped might be catchable if it wasn't to be the three promoted clubs going down again. And they've sort of gone 'see ya, we're out of here'. |  | | |
| 11,204 on 12:48 - Dec 17 with 489 views | monty_radio |
| 11,204 on 06:19 - Dec 17 by GavTWTD |
I've done so.
Yes it's definitely a bug but I wish people would be more descriptive with subject titles. Not only does it help people here make a more informed decision whether to open a thread but it also helps the thread get interest from Google.
But yes, DEFINITELY a bug. |
More descriptive Thread title for raising Google interest:
BOURNEMOUTH ATTRACT 4 FIGURE CROWD IN PREM!!! (but saved by extra 1205) | |
| |
| 11,204 on 13:13 - Dec 17 with 474 views | itfcjoe |
| 11,204 on 09:03 - Dec 17 by Stewart27 |
Gate receipts are a drop in the ocean when it comes to FFP. It’s nice to have a big ground to enable more fans to support the team and create a little more commercial revenue. But the real money comes through tv and sponsorship.
This crowd thing annoys me a little. 11,204 was our average gate under MM in the dark days and we had a 30k stadium. Now all of a sudden we’re billy big b0ll0cks because we’re selling out our ground. Not really sure what people are expecting Bournemouth to do? |
Use the 10 years of PL money to grow their fanbase in the local community - it's not a massive ask is it?
We haven't had a league attendance that low this millenium - it can't be great for the 'PL Product/Brand' to have such a small stadium in it, there should be a need to increase it to a minimum standard if in there long enough |  |
| |
| 11,204 on 13:22 - Dec 17 with 466 views | yorkshireblue |
| 11,204 on 13:13 - Dec 17 by itfcjoe |
Use the 10 years of PL money to grow their fanbase in the local community - it's not a massive ask is it?
We haven't had a league attendance that low this millenium - it can't be great for the 'PL Product/Brand' to have such a small stadium in it, there should be a need to increase it to a minimum standard if in there long enough |
I'd potnetially disagree on the final point... does having a small stadium help them sell it to other countries as "the best league in the world"... see - any team can do it dvaid vs gloiath type thing?
I honestly don't know, but it's feasible I guess. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
