| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. 15:37 - May 3 with 1642 views | redrickstuhaart |
And for several of the attempted ball out from the back (which he usually got right). |  | | |  |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:38 - May 3 with 1596 views | Metal_Hacker |
Didn’t it take a very slight nick on the way through ? |  |
| |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:39 - May 3 with 1558 views | FoghornGleghorn |
Do we need this every time we concede a goal? | | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:40 - May 3 with 1557 views | Trequartista |
No, Muric was slaughtered for clear mistakes. I don't think not being able to get to a ball swerving out of reach is a clear mistake. Sometimes it's just a briliant strike. |  |
| |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:40 - May 3 with 1542 views | DublinBlue84 |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:38 - May 3 by Metal_Hacker |
Didn’t it take a very slight nick on the way through ? |
Not a keeper mistake.
Took a MASSIVE swerve. Was heading right at him before late change of direction. | |
| |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:40 - May 3 with 1515 views | tonybied |
Yup, Palmer has been no better than Muric for me since his first 3-4 games. |  | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:40 - May 3 with 1517 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:40 - May 3 by Trequartista |
No, Muric was slaughtered for clear mistakes. I don't think not being able to get to a ball swerving out of reach is a clear mistake. Sometimes it's just a briliant strike. |
Not even moving for a shot from 25 yards? Muric would have been absolutely clobbered for that. | | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:40 - May 3 with 1496 views | CrockerITFC |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:38 - May 3 by Metal_Hacker |
Didn’t it take a very slight nick on the way through ? |
No it swerved massively, but in all fairness there's absolutely no way he should be allowed to shoot from there. For me it's more Burgess at fault for being a statue and not closing down the shot rather than the keeper's fault.
But really it doesn't matter to be honest, let's just be glad this season is almost over. |  | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:42 - May 3 with 1436 views | DublinBlue84 |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:40 - May 3 by redrickstuhaart |
Not even moving for a shot from 25 yards? Muric would have been absolutely clobbered for that. |
He was going to move but then saw it change direction late on so got flat footed. Not his fault. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:43 - May 3 with 1406 views | Whos_blue |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:38 - May 3 by Metal_Hacker |
Didn’t it take a very slight nick on the way through ? |
Not sure it did. I think it was just a quality strike. Though we did give him too much time and space to take it on.
As has become fairly predicatble for us, we start brightly, press the play well, then bang. Game over. |  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:44 - May 3 with 1371 views | DublinBlue84 |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:40 - May 3 by CrockerITFC |
No it swerved massively, but in all fairness there's absolutely no way he should be allowed to shoot from there. For me it's more Burgess at fault for being a statue and not closing down the shot rather than the keeper's fault.
But really it doesn't matter to be honest, let's just be glad this season is almost over. |
You forgot.
Burgess
Woolfy
Are perfect and never make mistakes.
That's the rule here. | |
| |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:47 - May 3 with 1332 views | FoghornGleghorn |
Incidentally, if Pickford was Muric he'd be slaughtered for that.
Am I doing it right? | | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:52 - May 3 with 1277 views | Scuzzer |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:39 - May 3 by FoghornGleghorn |
Do we need this every time we concede a goal? |
No we don't. It's idiotic. Fed up with it. |  |
| |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 16:05 - May 3 with 1162 views | pointofblue |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:44 - May 3 by DublinBlue84 |
You forgot.
Burgess
Woolfy
Are perfect and never make mistakes.
That's the rule here. |
As I said before - remove Woolfenden from that and replace with O'Shea.
Woolfenden has been criticised since the League One days. | |
| |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 16:45 - May 3 with 1038 views | stonojnr |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:39 - May 3 by FoghornGleghorn |
Do we need this every time we concede a goal? |
Yes, because Muric was criticised for every goal he conceded, even those he had no chance with.
Either we do it fairly to all our goalkeepers and all our goals, or we acknowledge people were just picking on Muric for their own agendas.
Which is it going to be? | | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 17:00 - May 3 with 989 views | Bluecasp |
Muric has been awful every team he's played at and been dreadful for us. He doesn't suddenly get better by not playing. Palmer is better. | | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 17:07 - May 3 with 942 views | FoghornGleghorn |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 16:45 - May 3 by stonojnr |
Yes, because Muric was criticised for every goal he conceded, even those he had no chance with.
Either we do it fairly to all our goalkeepers and all our goals, or we acknowledge people were just picking on Muric for their own agendas.
Which is it going to be? |
We're going to do it fairly to all our goalkeepers, by which measure Muric has made far more ridiculous errors that led directly to goals. Palmer might possibly have had more near misses, but those are not as bad as ridiculous errors leading directly to goals no matter how hard people push the "agenda against Muric" rubbish. [Post edited 3 May 17:31]
| | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 18:46 - May 3 with 750 views | EuanTown |
We are getting a new keeper for next season. |  | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 18:55 - May 3 with 733 views | gtsb1966 |
Muric is possibly the worst ever ITFC signing along with Marco Holster and Graham Harbey. Actually Muric heads the list for money paid. |  | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 19:05 - May 3 with 703 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 15:44 - May 3 by DublinBlue84 |
You forgot.
Burgess
Woolfy
Are perfect and never make mistakes.
That's the rule here. |
Grow up ffs |  | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 19:50 - May 3 with 582 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
It’s not unreasonable to say that Palmer didn’t make a mistake - the ball did swerve a lot, very late on. He was also possibly unsighted initially.
It’s also not unreasonably to suggest that Muric would have been crucified by some had he been in goal for that. Many had it in for him, to the point that almost all goals conceded were ‘Muric’s fault’.
Both statements can be true, and probably are. | | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 20:45 - May 3 with 484 views | RayleighBlue |
Yeah there have probably been goals Palmer could have done better with, and he had a very near miss with the back pass against Wolves, but he's made nothing like the mistakes that Muric made at terrible times in the game.
Yeah it probably wouldn't have been enough in the end but the timing of his mistakes against Brentford, his head rush at the end against Bournemouth and against Southampton really have burst our bubble when we were looking at fairly positive times.
But yeah it's the fans agenda against Muric which has him top of this table after playing half a season
https://www.premierleague.com/stats/top/players/error_lead_to_goal | | | |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 21:47 - May 3 with 332 views | lazyblue |
| Incidentally, if that was Muric he'd be slaughtered for it. on 18:55 - May 3 by gtsb1966 |
Muric is possibly the worst ever ITFC signing along with Marco Holster and Graham Harbey. Actually Muric heads the list for money paid. |
Graham Harbey and Neil woods what an era that was. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
