| 1st half of the season: An analysis 15:30 - Dec 31 with 1300 views | quantfootball |
Hi all,
I had done some analysis on the first 23 games of the season, looking at our underlying metrics and it ended up becoming an interesting piece. I've been given permission to post a link to the substack I uploaded it to:
https://footballquant.substack.com/p/the-ipswich-paradox
thanks |  | | |  |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 15:54 - Dec 31 with 1192 views | Ewan_Oozami |
Thank you - I think that very succinctly reflects my thoughts on the season so far and what I expect to happen for the rest of the season! |  |
| |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 15:57 - Dec 31 with 1184 views | vilanovablue |
A very enjoyable analysis, good stuff. |  | | |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 16:54 - Dec 31 with 1067 views | ringwoodblue |
A very interesting, insightful, well-explained and illustrated analysis. Thanks for sharing. |  |
| |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 17:14 - Dec 31 with 996 views | PhilsAngels |
mind blown | | | |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 17:50 - Dec 31 with 923 views | mellowblue |
Thank you, very interesting. Football being so analysis-driven now, you can see why there is no place in football for dinosaurs like Allardyce, McCarthy etc. The profile of managers has changed. | | | |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 18:57 - Dec 31 with 848 views | djgooder |
In my Uber summary it says we are awesome, but also we haven’t performed to the levels we should have so shouldn’t feel like we are awesome.
Kind of how I feel I guess but could never have described it in such a way.
A really good read. Thanks. |  | | |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 19:36 - Dec 31 with 778 views | KungfuBlue |
Enjoyed the analysis. Thanks for the effort you put in and for sharing |  | | |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 19:43 - Dec 31 with 760 views | MK1 |
Brilliant work. Thanks. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 20:37 - Dec 31 with 682 views | NthQldITFC |
That is really, really good, thanks. Thorough and well written. Nice job. |  |
| |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 23:44 - Dec 31 with 547 views | Kropotkin123 |
Awesome, thank you. Great read. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 06:19 - Jan 1 with 408 views | Battersea_Blue |
That's really interesting stuff, thanks for sharing. | | | |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 09:20 - Jan 1 with 278 views | Dubtractor |
That's a really well written analysis, and does a good job of explaining why xg etc isn't bollards, even if some don't like it as a metric.
A lot of what you write is increasingly apparent from the visual test, in particular the low number of good chances that we give away.
Just need to be more clinical with the chances that we do create! |  |
| |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 10:42 - Jan 1 with 157 views | Alberto_the_frog |
Too clever for me. I think it agrees with what I thought just looking at results and highlights, though. Southampton and Sheff U would be expected to have more points. I'd put Leicester in that category too. |  | | |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 11:03 - Jan 1 with 106 views | NthQldITFC |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 10:42 - Jan 1 by Alberto_the_frog |
Too clever for me. I think it agrees with what I thought just looking at results and highlights, though. Southampton and Sheff U would be expected to have more points. I'd put Leicester in that category too. |
The level of agreement with the eye test to some extent helps to validate the methodology, as does correlation with completed seasons, as long-term as possible, over several seasons of data gathering.
Then you have confidence that the methodology has value, not as a precise predictor, but as better and better tool to help understand what's likely to happen. And if it works well for your own club, for which you inevitably have far more visual experience and ability to judge, then you can have a high degree of trust that it really helps understanding other clubs of which you have limited visual experience. | |
| |
| 1st half of the season: An analysis on 12:27 - Jan 1 with 16 views | Smoresy |
Top, top stuff.
My only (personal) caution would be on regression to the mean within a single season. Hull enjoy the greatest positive variance currently in points compared with "expected points", +11 now I believe. In 24/25, the highest positive variances were welcomed by Burnley, +24 points, and Sheff Utd, +20. In 23/24, we were the biggest "beneficiaries" with +15. In 22/23, it was Burnley again with +19. 21/22, Huddersfield with +22, lovely.
So hopefully variance evens out - good reason to hope it will - but it's also normal to finish a season with notable outliers in both directions, either through luck, individual excellence or a combination. None of this negates the positivity which rightfully flows through your piece. The numbers are with us! (All hail the numbers.) | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
