Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Bid in for Piroe 16:53 - Jan 27 with 5920 viewsportmanking



Piroe not currently interested, but offer on the table...
1
If we get promoted.... on 18:32 - Jan 27 with 1567 viewsBloots

I think it confirms.... on 18:27 - Jan 27 by Kieran_Knows

Well, quite. But is Piroe on a 4 year deal and probably close to pushing £10m the answer when we’ll be looking to replace him in 6 months time?


....then I expect we'd just move Hirst on, get an upgrade on Piroe and keep him as the rotation.

It's a slow and gradual way to improve the options.

Of course if he's a total disaster there's always the potential of a Championship club that has terrible options up front paying decent money for him next season!

"The holy trinity” - TWTD User (Jan 2026)

0
Bid in for Piroe on 18:35 - Jan 27 with 1532 viewsCheltenham_Blue

Bid in for Piroe on 17:59 - Jan 27 by PhilTWTD

Am told no bid but one on the list.


I was told similar by a girl once.

Poll: Is it more annoying when builders

0
Bid in for Piroe on 18:39 - Jan 27 with 1463 viewslazyblue

Heard this at beginning of Jan that he was THE forward they were targeting so to have this reported now as bid gone can only mean this may progress.
0
Bid in for Piroe on 18:44 - Jan 27 with 1407 viewsWacko

Bid in for Piroe on 18:19 - Jan 27 by Kieran_Knows

Not sure what that really says about our current striking options that we’re prepared to spend the best part of 7 figures, maybe close to 8 figures when it’s clear that whilst he might be a slight improvement, he wound t be able to step up to the Prem.


I don't think you can write someone off after half a season. He's not doing it now but he might do it later after having more experience. Pretty sure Bamford wasn't great when he first went to the Prem. Also Chris Wood. And maybe Farke isn't playing the right system to suit him (and he's definitely not had enough chances to prove himself)

Poll: Who would you rather see lose their job?

0
Bid in for Piroe on 18:56 - Jan 27 with 1334 viewsIllinoisblue

Bid in for Piroe on 18:19 - Jan 27 by Kieran_Knows

Not sure what that really says about our current striking options that we’re prepared to spend the best part of 7 figures, maybe close to 8 figures when it’s clear that whilst he might be a slight improvement, he wound t be able to step up to the Prem.


Surely priority A - really the only priority for the next few months - is getting to the Prem and then we can worry about future recruitment.

I think Piroe is overrated and likely overpriced. But could he help us get over the line? Quite probably.

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

1
I think it confirms.... on 18:58 - Jan 27 with 1317 viewsHighgateBlue

I think it confirms.... on 18:27 - Jan 27 by Kieran_Knows

Well, quite. But is Piroe on a 4 year deal and probably close to pushing £10m the answer when we’ll be looking to replace him in 6 months time?


If Hirst is not good enough for the Championship then I suggest that it will be he rather than Piroe who will be moving on. Is it really feasible to buy a Prem ready striker? Not too many Abrahamses around, and if there were, they wouldn't want to come to us.
0
Bid in for Piroe on 18:58 - Jan 27 with 1314 viewsKieran_Knows

Bid in for Piroe on 18:56 - Jan 27 by Illinoisblue

Surely priority A - really the only priority for the next few months - is getting to the Prem and then we can worry about future recruitment.

I think Piroe is overrated and likely overpriced. But could he help us get over the line? Quite probably.


I wouldn’t be against a 4 month loan as think he’d be decent enough and as I say, a slight improvement on what we currently have.

I wouldn’t want to be spending anywhere near the sort of money on what would be a long term deal.

Poll: We’ve got super KM, he knows exactly what we need. Woolfie at the back…

0
Bid in for Piroe on 19:18 - Jan 27 with 1199 viewsBloomBlue

I guess we just have to wait for Piroe to peruse the contract offer?
0
Login to get fewer ads

Bid in for Piroe on 22:39 - Jan 27 with 900 viewsNthQldITFC

Bid in for Piroe on 17:42 - Jan 27 by Horsham

He’ll be alright once he’s had a good think about it


That sounds like the Suffolk equivalent of the Sicilian "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse"!

Good work by Philogene...... GREAT WORK BY PHILOGENE!!!
Poll: How would you feel about a UK Identity Card?

1
I think it confirms.... on 22:52 - Jan 27 with 776 viewsFelixBlue4

I think it confirms.... on 18:27 - Jan 27 by Kieran_Knows

Well, quite. But is Piroe on a 4 year deal and probably close to pushing £10m the answer when we’ll be looking to replace him in 6 months time?


This is the type of situation where you have to do one of those deals that’s too good to turn down. Get him on a 4 year deal with a condition that if we are not promoted this year should a premier league club come in for him at the original purchase price in the following window we won’t stand in his way. Also put a release clause in for the remainder of the contract, that way if he is that good he will still end up where he wants to be. Little bit like the Delap deal it’s what was needed to get him through the door and get it over the line, ok people didn’t like losing him but without that deal he would have ended up somewhere else. I for one wouldn’t have a problem not being his first choice destination it shows a little ambition, a bit like us ending up with a 4th on the list player aim high and see where you end up.
1
Bid in for Piroe on 06:24 - Jan 28 with 389 viewsfranz_tyson

We mean business, I suppose.

At least we're not desperate. We could go on with Hirst, Azon and Akpom and rely on Philogene/Clarke and goals being shared around. No Al Hamadi or Ahadme signings needed.

If we get a quality striker... great.... but we don't need panic buys.
[Post edited 28 Jan 6:27]
1
Bid in for Piroe on 06:33 - Jan 28 with 370 viewsPioneerBlue

This thread continued despite the translation saying the deal is off because he doesnt want championship football. Somewhere between the murkiness lays the answer!

I think he would be good but not sure we want a player anything other than 100% committed and the track record of signings where the player isnt inspired by the champ cant be good, nonenof that chat prior to Dan Neil for example, take Marc Guiu for example.

Blog: Ipswich Ramblings

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026