| MissSuffolkBlue 10:14 - Mar 13 with 3448 views | portmanking |
On X... the mysterious anti-Ashton account. She's just tweeted that Leif is banned for 3 games?! What for?! |  | | |  |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:24 - Mar 13 with 984 views | GlasgowBlue |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 10:43 - Mar 13 by itfcjoe |
I didn't see it but in our Blue Monday Telegram group someone put a message in there saying:
"Leif should be off before that. Pulled the lad down by his hair, blatant!!"
So if it is true then potentially was that |
Yes I saw the comment on telegram just after the incident. Just looked like a retaliatory shove to me but I was watching on Town TV and I don't recall a replay of the incident. |  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:25 - Mar 13 with 978 views | SitfcB |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 10:45 - Mar 13 by Herbivore |
Think he was charged first. That seems to be the usual process although I've seen Joe mention that a Swindon player got a ban out of the blue so perhaps it can happen.
Edit - Just checked and Morsy was charged first, then given a ban. [Post edited 13 Mar 10:54]
|
Morsy was charged because it was something that happened in the tunnel after the game. (If you’re talking about the Boro one)
Best example is this one, announced the day before their next game.
Also there was the Watford one the other week, that didn’t come out until Watford announced their team news for their next game. [Post edited 13 Mar 11:34]
|  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:27 - Mar 13 with 949 views | MattinLondon |
Doesn’t the FA have to be fully transparent in terms of player suspensions etc with players, clubs fans being completely aware of their decision making? Not sure someone on Twitter will know more than clubs and players. |  | | |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:31 - Mar 13 with 876 views | Guthrum |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:27 - Mar 13 by MattinLondon |
Doesn’t the FA have to be fully transparent in terms of player suspensions etc with players, clubs fans being completely aware of their decision making? Not sure someone on Twitter will know more than clubs and players. |
Unless it's a process which is only just starting (thus any ban, if eventually applied, would not come into force yet). Can't see any logical reason why the club, the FA/EFL or anyone else would try to keep it quiet, let alone all of them. |  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:31 - Mar 13 with 879 views | SitfcB |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:27 - Mar 13 by MattinLondon |
Doesn’t the FA have to be fully transparent in terms of player suspensions etc with players, clubs fans being completely aware of their decision making? Not sure someone on Twitter will know more than clubs and players. |
Yes but things aren’t announced to the public straight away you know.
We might not want it out there until the team news is announced (see also Watford example I gave) [Post edited 13 Mar 11:32]
| |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:32 - Mar 13 with 868 views | itfcjoe |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:03 - Mar 13 by _CliveBaker_ |
Furlong - O'Shea - Greaves - Johnson isn't the worst back 4. I don't mind Ben Johnson, he's no Leif Davis but he's competent. Hopefully less of an issue tomorrow, but Davis missing both Wall and Brum would be a sucker punch. |
Just have to pray Furlong doesn't get 10th yellow tomorrow to miss next 2 as well! |  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:34 - Mar 13 with 836 views | Herbivore |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:25 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
Morsy was charged because it was something that happened in the tunnel after the game. (If you’re talking about the Boro one)
Best example is this one, announced the day before their next game.
Also there was the Watford one the other week, that didn’t come out until Watford announced their team news for their next game. [Post edited 13 Mar 11:34]
|
Morsy was charged for "punching" an Accrington player during the game, that's the one I'm referring to. |  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:37 - Mar 13 with 812 views | billlm |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 10:31 - Mar 13 by portmanking |
You can't be serious? Hardly anyone mentioned this post-match. The PGMOL surely wouldn't shaft us on the penalty *and* this... |
They would, as long as we don't go up everyone's happy |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:38 - Mar 13 with 811 views | Basuco |
The Watford player was banned quite quickly after our Tuesday game with them, maybe Town are appealing it? |  | | |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:42 - Mar 13 with 762 views | SitfcB |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:34 - Mar 13 by Herbivore |
Morsy was charged for "punching" an Accrington player during the game, that's the one I'm referring to. |
Fairs I did just edit the post to reference Boro.
They must’ve changed the way they do it since then because the first you hear about it now is the news of the ban. | |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:42 - Mar 13 with 755 views | ITFC_Forever |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:32 - Mar 13 by itfcjoe |
Just have to pray Furlong doesn't get 10th yellow tomorrow to miss next 2 as well! |
Maybe KMc was alluding to that when he was talking about yellow and red cards sometimes having an impact on selection. |  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:46 - Mar 13 with 701 views | EastTownBlue |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:38 - Mar 13 by Basuco |
The Watford player was banned quite quickly after our Tuesday game with them, maybe Town are appealing it? |
Could be that Watford accepted the charge while we appealed it and then were unsuccessful. | | | |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:46 - Mar 13 with 695 views | MattinLondon |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:18 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
Unfortunately she has quite a good success rate. |
Like what? | | | |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:51 - Mar 13 with 658 views | MattinLondon |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:31 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
Yes but things aren’t announced to the public straight away you know.
We might not want it out there until the team news is announced (see also Watford example I gave) [Post edited 13 Mar 11:32]
|
So it’s not in the public domain, no other institution has commented about it but yet some random person on X knows? Is that where things are? | | | |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:53 - Mar 13 with 635 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:32 - Mar 13 by itfcjoe |
Just have to pray Furlong doesn't get 10th yellow tomorrow to miss next 2 as well! |
If Davis does get this ban we literally cannot play Furlong tomorrow. We'd have to leave him it out and just risk Boniface or something at LB, so we can play Johnson at RB, or do something creative like play Burns at RB? I suppose we also have Baggott who could play at CB and push Greaves to LB.
We cannot put ourselves in a situation where we have Furlong/Kipre/Davis missing at the same point for 2 out of the next three. [Post edited 13 Mar 11:54]
|  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:59 - Mar 13 with 568 views | _CliveBaker_ |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:53 - Mar 13 by JammyDodgerrr |
If Davis does get this ban we literally cannot play Furlong tomorrow. We'd have to leave him it out and just risk Boniface or something at LB, so we can play Johnson at RB, or do something creative like play Burns at RB? I suppose we also have Baggott who could play at CB and push Greaves to LB.
We cannot put ourselves in a situation where we have Furlong/Kipre/Davis missing at the same point for 2 out of the next three. [Post edited 13 Mar 11:54]
|
I think it goes the other way, with 2 already enforced changes in the back 4 we're less likely to make a 3rd voluntarily. |  | | |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:07 - Mar 13 with 514 views | Guthrum |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:46 - Mar 13 by EastTownBlue |
Could be that Watford accepted the charge while we appealed it and then were unsuccessful. |
Struggle to believe that the charges were faced, Davis convicted and the club launched an appeal, all with no announcement from any of the parties concerned. What reason would the FA/EFL have for keeping it quiet, when they usually don't? | |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:07 - Mar 13 with 503 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 11:59 - Mar 13 by _CliveBaker_ |
I think it goes the other way, with 2 already enforced changes in the back 4 we're less likely to make a 3rd voluntarily. |
Let's say he plays and gets booked, so it would look like:
Furlong O'Shea Greaves Johnson - 2 Changes
Milwall game would be, what exactly?
Johnson O'Shea Greaves/Baggott Boniface/Greaves - 1 change but moving about
Brum Game
Johnson O'Shea Kipre Greaves - Still 1 change and moving people about
I'd rather take the hit against the worst team in champ history than against Millwall/Brum personally, but happy to admit i might be overthinking it. | |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:22 - Mar 13 with 417 views | Steve_M |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:07 - Mar 13 by JammyDodgerrr |
Let's say he plays and gets booked, so it would look like:
Furlong O'Shea Greaves Johnson - 2 Changes
Milwall game would be, what exactly?
Johnson O'Shea Greaves/Baggott Boniface/Greaves - 1 change but moving about
Brum Game
Johnson O'Shea Kipre Greaves - Still 1 change and moving people about
I'd rather take the hit against the worst team in champ history than against Millwall/Brum personally, but happy to admit i might be overthinking it. |
I think, especially after the last two results, that getting three points tomorrow is the first priority. We can worry about Millwall after that.
But, yeah, a makeshift defence against a sh1thousing Alex Neill side does- plus an early kick off and rail replacement buses - would make that game potentially very frustrating. |  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:22 - Mar 13 with 416 views | FrimleyBlue |
Nothing on the FA website which would normally show all charges put to players. if there are paper tribunals etc... only ipswich reference is the watford one |  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:26 - Mar 13 with 387 views | ghostofescobar |
Praying for a Phil “nothing in it, we understand” comment. |  |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:27 - Mar 13 with 374 views | EastTownBlue |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:07 - Mar 13 by Guthrum |
Struggle to believe that the charges were faced, Davis convicted and the club launched an appeal, all with no announcement from any of the parties concerned. What reason would the FA/EFL have for keeping it quiet, when they usually don't? |
As mentioned below. The Watford player’s suspension for the incident with O’Shea wasn’t announced anywhere until they announced their team against Bristol City on the Friday. | | | |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:28 - Mar 13 with 371 views | positivity |
how reliable a source is it? | |
| |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:35 - Mar 13 with 292 views | _CliveBaker_ |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:07 - Mar 13 by JammyDodgerrr |
Let's say he plays and gets booked, so it would look like:
Furlong O'Shea Greaves Johnson - 2 Changes
Milwall game would be, what exactly?
Johnson O'Shea Greaves/Baggott Boniface/Greaves - 1 change but moving about
Brum Game
Johnson O'Shea Kipre Greaves - Still 1 change and moving people about
I'd rather take the hit against the worst team in champ history than against Millwall/Brum personally, but happy to admit i might be overthinking it. |
Aware of the risk but we can't manage games on what ifs.
There's 3 points to be had tomorrow, we need to put our best foot forward to get them. | | | |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:44 - Mar 13 with 231 views | Illinoisblue |
| MissSuffolkBlue on 12:28 - Mar 13 by positivity |
how reliable a source is it? |
She/he/they have had some very def info over the years but also of late some total bollox. We’ll see I guess. Be great bantz if after a week where we’ve had two PMGOL apologies we then get Leif hit with a ban for something hardly anyone noticed. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
