Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Today’s Ref 20:15 - Oct 10 with 1276 viewsShobby

Great performance all round and ultimately deserved the 3 points.

I thought the ref, Mr Smith, had a good game too.
0
Today’s Ref on 20:17 - Oct 10DarkBrandon

I thought it was about as easy a game as you’ll get to referee. There wasn’t a single bad challenge in the game. Was his booking of Davis harsh? I didn’t get a clear view. But other than that I certainly can’t criticise
0
Today’s Ref on 20:18 - Oct 10SitfcB

I thought he was terrible at times tbh. Lost control and didn’t seem to want to give decisions. Not seen it back but if he gave that penalty I doubt it gets overturned.

COYB
Poll: Should we block polls for one day?
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

3
Today’s Ref on 20:20 - Oct 10DarkBrandon

Today’s Ref on 20:18 - Oct 10 by SitfcB

I thought he was terrible at times tbh. Lost control and didn’t seem to want to give decisions. Not seen it back but if he gave that penalty I doubt it gets overturned.


Yeah, I’d love to see that penalty shout again. Forgot about that
0
Today’s Ref on 20:20 - Oct 10farkenhell

Apart from not giving many Fulham fouls in the first half and denying us a stonewall penalty in the second, yes Mr Simith had a good game.
0
Today’s Ref on 20:21 - Oct 10BelsteadCav

Was it a penalty though?

I couldn’t see but everyone around me said it was

King of the board since 98
Poll: Which way do you swing?

0
Today’s Ref on 20:21 - Oct 10NthQldITFC

The penalty on Daizen was a pen in my opinion. The defender (unintentionally, admittedly) scraped his studs down the outside of Daizen's lower leg, which was angled out a bit and a component of the force would have been pushing his leg in and down, causing Daizen to fall away from it in self-protection.

Hard to see for the ref possibly, but I do think VAR should have quickly understood the above and called the whistleman to the screen.

Good work by Philogene...... GREAT WORK BY PHILOGENE!!!
Poll: How would you feel about a UK Identity Card?

1
Today’s Ref on 20:26 - Oct 10Dubtractor

Today’s Ref on 20:18 - Oct 10 by SitfcB

I thought he was terrible at times tbh. Lost control and didn’t seem to want to give decisions. Not seen it back but if he gave that penalty I doubt it gets overturned.


I thought he was pretty poor tbh, as you say seemed really reluctant to make decisions.

On a refereeing note, today was a game where I thought an orange card/sinbin would be warranted.

3 or 4 times Fulham committed unbelievably cynical fouls to stop play on halfway, with a really promising opening for us stopped on each occasion.
[Post edited 10 Oct 20:33]

I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun. I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.
Poll: Correct Ketchup Distribution on Chips?

1
Today’s Ref on 20:31 - Oct 10Mullet

Today’s Ref on 20:26 - Oct 10 by Dubtractor

I thought he was pretty poor tbh, as you say seemed really reluctant to make decisions.

On a refereeing note, today was a game where I thought an orange card/sinbin would be warranted.

3 or 4 times Fulham committed unbelievably cynical fouls to stop play on halfway, with a really promising opening for us stopped on each occasion.
[Post edited 10 Oct 20:33]


He was toot when it mattered. Deflections that should have been corners, free kicks that were clear etc he just dithered on time and again.

After Fatawu it’s so clear how often players don’t get booked for diving too this season.

Poll: Which itfc kit do you usually buy
Blog: When the Fanzine Comes Around

0
Login to get fewer ads

Today’s Ref on 20:32 - Oct 10ArnoldMoorhen

Today’s Ref on 20:21 - Oct 10 by NthQldITFC

The penalty on Daizen was a pen in my opinion. The defender (unintentionally, admittedly) scraped his studs down the outside of Daizen's lower leg, which was angled out a bit and a component of the force would have been pushing his leg in and down, causing Daizen to fall away from it in self-protection.

Hard to see for the ref possibly, but I do think VAR should have quickly understood the above and called the whistleman to the screen.


+1 for "whistleman"- positively Hamian.
1
Today’s Ref on 20:32 - Oct 10Scuzzer

Hmmmm....first twenty minutes he was prepared to let it be a good competitive game. Then after that for some reason after Leif's ridiculous booking he seemed to crack down on us while letting Fulham players to dive around and free kicks. Continued to be a bit pernickerty second half and then...how on earth didn't we get a penalty? Why didn't he book Maeda if it was a dive? But he did end up being good in making decisions .

Established 1968

0
Today’s Ref on 20:37 - Oct 10DanTheMan

Today’s Ref on 20:26 - Oct 10 by Dubtractor

I thought he was pretty poor tbh, as you say seemed really reluctant to make decisions.

On a refereeing note, today was a game where I thought an orange card/sinbin would be warranted.

3 or 4 times Fulham committed unbelievably cynical fouls to stop play on halfway, with a really promising opening for us stopped on each occasion.
[Post edited 10 Oct 20:33]


The Outarra was really egregious, zero attempt to play the ball, just threw him over.

Poll: FM Parallel Game Week 1 (Fulham) - Available Team

0
Today’s Ref on 20:38 - Oct 10_CliveBaker_

Today’s Ref on 20:17 - Oct 10 by DarkBrandon

I thought it was about as easy a game as you’ll get to referee. There wasn’t a single bad challenge in the game. Was his booking of Davis harsh? I didn’t get a clear view. But other than that I certainly can’t criticise


Thought he got the Davis one right from where I was. Looked overzealous from Leif, a touch out of control, and from the side / back. Certainly a foul, never a red, think a yellow was exactly the right call.

Thought Maeda was caught in real time, not seen it back though.
0
Today’s Ref on 23:32 - Oct 10armchaircritic59

Today’s Ref on 20:17 - Oct 10 by DarkBrandon

I thought it was about as easy a game as you’ll get to referee. There wasn’t a single bad challenge in the game. Was his booking of Davis harsh? I didn’t get a clear view. But other than that I certainly can’t criticise


No it was correct, went through the player first before he got the ball. Should most definitely have been a penalty on Maeda though, fouled first outside the box and then again inside it. Aside from that I thought he did well and tried to keep the game flowing as much as possible. In truth not too difficult as both sides wanted to play and not resort to the " dark arts ". The law changes appear to be having a welcome effect on the games, so far.
0
Today’s Ref on 23:36 - Oct 10Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior

Today’s Ref on 20:21 - Oct 10 by BelsteadCav

Was it a penalty though?

I couldn’t see but everyone around me said it was


As with most of these depends what team you support. No way as clear cut as some are saying.

I thought he had a good game.

Poll: Ok gut feeling then, promotion?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026