So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? 10:18 - Aug 10 with 2831 views | Wallingford_Boy | Got a bit lost on what we spend on who! And yes I realise we will be spending a lot on these new boys wages, but in terms of fees, we must be in profit. |  |
| |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:25 - Aug 10 with 2771 views | jayessess | I'd guess more or less breaking even? Edmondson, Fraser and Chaplin were all high 6 figures, Burns, Harper and Hladky all low 6 figures, which gets to somewhere around £2.5m-3m. Bonne, Barry and Coulson presumably cost us loan fees too. |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 with 2759 views | PattiswickBlue | Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players: Downes - 1mil + Dozzell - 1mil Gibbs - 600k Bishop - 220k Lankester - Nominal Drinan - Nominal Hawkins - Nominal = Approx 3mil Players signed for money: Edmundson - 750k Chaplin - 750k Fraser - 350k? (Guess) Harper - 250k Burns - 150k Hladky - 150k? (Guess) = Approx 2.4mil So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k. |  | |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 with 2640 views | Wallingford_Boy |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 by PattiswickBlue | Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players: Downes - 1mil + Dozzell - 1mil Gibbs - 600k Bishop - 220k Lankester - Nominal Drinan - Nominal Hawkins - Nominal = Approx 3mil Players signed for money: Edmundson - 750k Chaplin - 750k Fraser - 350k? (Guess) Harper - 250k Burns - 150k Hladky - 150k? (Guess) = Approx 2.4mil So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k. |
I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k. Which would still leave us with a profit. Decent business. Apart from that bloody Aluko....!! |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:45 - Aug 10 with 2609 views | PattiswickBlue |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy | I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k. Which would still leave us with a profit. Decent business. Apart from that bloody Aluko....!! |
I think the Edmundson deal can rise to 1mil plus but initially it is 750k I believe. Fraser could have easily been more, but he was in the last year of his contract. |  | |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:54 - Aug 10 with 2551 views | bournemouthblue |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy | I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k. Which would still leave us with a profit. Decent business. Apart from that bloody Aluko....!! |
Everyone seems to be disappointed with Aluko but he certainly used to be pretty lively back in the day He can't be any worse than judge surely, he's a rare senior player with experience? |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:55 - Aug 10 with 2543 views | PhilTWTD |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy | I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k. Which would still leave us with a profit. Decent business. Apart from that bloody Aluko....!! |
Edmundson was definitely £750,000. Not sure on Fraser. |  | |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:58 - Aug 10 with 2517 views | gtsb1966 |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy | I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k. Which would still leave us with a profit. Decent business. Apart from that bloody Aluko....!! |
Aluko is a squad filler for cup games hence the one year deal. |  | |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 11:24 - Aug 10 with 2419 views | bobbyramsey | Having got rid of so many player (I've lost count) I wonder weather we are up or down on wages? [Post edited 10 Aug 2021 11:25]
|  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 11:29 - Aug 10 with 2383 views | Wallingford_Boy |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:54 - Aug 10 by bournemouthblue | Everyone seems to be disappointed with Aluko but he certainly used to be pretty lively back in the day He can't be any worse than judge surely, he's a rare senior player with experience? |
Denis Law was lively back in the day! Papa Johns specialist. Can't see him getting in the league 18. |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 13:50 - Aug 10 with 2183 views | itfcserbia |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 by PattiswickBlue | Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players: Downes - 1mil + Dozzell - 1mil Gibbs - 600k Bishop - 220k Lankester - Nominal Drinan - Nominal Hawkins - Nominal = Approx 3mil Players signed for money: Edmundson - 750k Chaplin - 750k Fraser - 350k? (Guess) Harper - 250k Burns - 150k Hladky - 150k? (Guess) = Approx 2.4mil So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k. |
I thought Harper was close to 500k not 250k. Also, Fraser reports said "high 6-figure", so I guess we're a bit less than 600k in plus but still hell of a dealings this summer. |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 14:45 - Aug 10 with 2061 views | blue62 | Don't forget agents fees, no doubt a few '000 there. |  | |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 14:57 - Aug 10 with 2022 views | Wallingford_Boy |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 14:45 - Aug 10 by blue62 | Don't forget agents fees, no doubt a few '000 there. |
Yeah not really something we can work out, same with wages. But yes, obviously thats much higher than last season! But some are making out we've spent millions in transfer fees, which is clearly not the case. To get a profit on ins/outs is pretty impressive. |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:07 - Aug 10 with 1986 views | itfcjoe |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 by PattiswickBlue | Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players: Downes - 1mil + Dozzell - 1mil Gibbs - 600k Bishop - 220k Lankester - Nominal Drinan - Nominal Hawkins - Nominal = Approx 3mil Players signed for money: Edmundson - 750k Chaplin - 750k Fraser - 350k? (Guess) Harper - 250k Burns - 150k Hladky - 150k? (Guess) = Approx 2.4mil So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k. |
Hladky was £300k |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:21 - Aug 10 with 1937 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 11:24 - Aug 10 by bobbyramsey | Having got rid of so many player (I've lost count) I wonder weather we are up or down on wages? [Post edited 10 Aug 2021 11:25]
|
Panic not. I'm sure someone is on FM21 right now and will come back with their wages momentarily. In all seriousness, we are in a depressed market at the moment, so the contracts we are handing out now are unlikely to be at the same levels similar players would have got two years ago. |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:44 - Aug 10 with 1891 views | Wickets |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:58 - Aug 10 by gtsb1966 | Aluko is a squad filler for cup games hence the one year deal. |
More than likely and i find it strange that someone wants to put him down before he kicks a ball for us ! Proper fan ? |  | |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:48 - Aug 10 with 1870 views | BloomBlue |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 14:45 - Aug 10 by blue62 | Don't forget agents fees, no doubt a few '000 there. |
It will be interesting when they publish the agents fees how this years compares with last, often players on a free result in a higher agent fee |  | |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 17:57 - Aug 10 with 1727 views | J2BLUE |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 by PattiswickBlue | Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players: Downes - 1mil + Dozzell - 1mil Gibbs - 600k Bishop - 220k Lankester - Nominal Drinan - Nominal Hawkins - Nominal = Approx 3mil Players signed for money: Edmundson - 750k Chaplin - 750k Fraser - 350k? (Guess) Harper - 250k Burns - 150k Hladky - 150k? (Guess) = Approx 2.4mil So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k. |
Burns £150k!?!?!?!? |  |
|  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 18:27 - Aug 10 with 1664 views | PattiswickBlue |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 17:57 - Aug 10 by J2BLUE | Burns £150k!?!?!?!? |
Yeah, EADT reported that Burns was 150k and Harper was 250k in the end, after there original reports said it was 500k. |  | |  |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 18:28 - Aug 10 with 1657 views | PattiswickBlue |
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:07 - Aug 10 by itfcjoe | Hladky was £300k |
Interesting, any idea on Fraser? |  | |  |
| |