Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? 10:18 - Aug 10 with 2831 viewsWallingford_Boy

Got a bit lost on what we spend on who!

And yes I realise we will be spending a lot on these new boys wages, but in terms of fees, we must be in profit.


RIP Sir Bobby

1
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:25 - Aug 10 with 2771 viewsjayessess

I'd guess more or less breaking even?
Edmondson, Fraser and Chaplin were all high 6 figures, Burns, Harper and Hladky all low 6 figures, which gets to somewhere around £2.5m-3m. Bonne, Barry and Coulson presumably cost us loan fees too.

Blog: What Now? Taking a Look at Life in League One

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 with 2759 viewsPattiswickBlue

Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players:
Downes - 1mil +
Dozzell - 1mil
Gibbs - 600k
Bishop - 220k
Lankester - Nominal
Drinan - Nominal
Hawkins - Nominal
= Approx 3mil

Players signed for money:
Edmundson - 750k
Chaplin - 750k
Fraser - 350k? (Guess)
Harper - 250k
Burns - 150k
Hladky - 150k? (Guess)
= Approx 2.4mil

So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k.
2
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 with 2640 viewsWallingford_Boy

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 by PattiswickBlue

Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players:
Downes - 1mil +
Dozzell - 1mil
Gibbs - 600k
Bishop - 220k
Lankester - Nominal
Drinan - Nominal
Hawkins - Nominal
= Approx 3mil

Players signed for money:
Edmundson - 750k
Chaplin - 750k
Fraser - 350k? (Guess)
Harper - 250k
Burns - 150k
Hladky - 150k? (Guess)
= Approx 2.4mil

So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k.


I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k.

Which would still leave us with a profit.

Decent business.

Apart from that bloody Aluko....!!

RIP Sir Bobby

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:45 - Aug 10 with 2609 viewsPattiswickBlue

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy

I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k.

Which would still leave us with a profit.

Decent business.

Apart from that bloody Aluko....!!


I think the Edmundson deal can rise to 1mil plus but initially it is 750k I believe. Fraser could have easily been more, but he was in the last year of his contract.
0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:54 - Aug 10 with 2551 viewsbournemouthblue

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy

I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k.

Which would still leave us with a profit.

Decent business.

Apart from that bloody Aluko....!!


Everyone seems to be disappointed with Aluko but he certainly used to be pretty lively back in the day

He can't be any worse than judge surely, he's a rare senior player with experience?

Alcohol is the answer but I can't remember the question!
Poll: How much for Omari

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:55 - Aug 10 with 2543 viewsPhilTWTD

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy

I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k.

Which would still leave us with a profit.

Decent business.

Apart from that bloody Aluko....!!


Edmundson was definitely £750,000. Not sure on Fraser.
0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:58 - Aug 10 with 2517 viewsgtsb1966

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:43 - Aug 10 by Wallingford_Boy

I thought Edmundson was £900k and Fraser more like £750k.

Which would still leave us with a profit.

Decent business.

Apart from that bloody Aluko....!!


Aluko is a squad filler for cup games hence the one year deal.
0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 11:24 - Aug 10 with 2419 viewsbobbyramsey

Having got rid of so many player (I've lost count) I wonder weather we are up or down on wages?
[Post edited 10 Aug 2021 11:25]
0
Login to get fewer ads

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 11:29 - Aug 10 with 2383 viewsWallingford_Boy

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:54 - Aug 10 by bournemouthblue

Everyone seems to be disappointed with Aluko but he certainly used to be pretty lively back in the day

He can't be any worse than judge surely, he's a rare senior player with experience?


Denis Law was lively back in the day!

Papa Johns specialist.

Can't see him getting in the league 18.

RIP Sir Bobby

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 13:50 - Aug 10 with 2183 viewsitfcserbia

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 by PattiswickBlue

Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players:
Downes - 1mil +
Dozzell - 1mil
Gibbs - 600k
Bishop - 220k
Lankester - Nominal
Drinan - Nominal
Hawkins - Nominal
= Approx 3mil

Players signed for money:
Edmundson - 750k
Chaplin - 750k
Fraser - 350k? (Guess)
Harper - 250k
Burns - 150k
Hladky - 150k? (Guess)
= Approx 2.4mil

So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k.


I thought Harper was close to 500k not 250k. Also, Fraser reports said "high 6-figure", so I guess we're a bit less than 600k in plus but still hell of a dealings this summer.

Semper fidelis!
Poll: Would you sack Paul Cook?

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 14:45 - Aug 10 with 2061 viewsblue62

Don't forget agents fees, no doubt a few '000 there.
0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 14:57 - Aug 10 with 2022 viewsWallingford_Boy

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 14:45 - Aug 10 by blue62

Don't forget agents fees, no doubt a few '000 there.


Yeah not really something we can work out, same with wages.

But yes, obviously thats much higher than last season!

But some are making out we've spent millions in transfer fees, which is clearly not the case. To get a profit on ins/outs is pretty impressive.

RIP Sir Bobby

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:07 - Aug 10 with 1986 viewsitfcjoe

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 by PattiswickBlue

Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players:
Downes - 1mil +
Dozzell - 1mil
Gibbs - 600k
Bishop - 220k
Lankester - Nominal
Drinan - Nominal
Hawkins - Nominal
= Approx 3mil

Players signed for money:
Edmundson - 750k
Chaplin - 750k
Fraser - 350k? (Guess)
Harper - 250k
Burns - 150k
Hladky - 150k? (Guess)
= Approx 2.4mil

So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k.


Hladky was £300k

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:21 - Aug 10 with 1937 viewsCheltenham_Blue

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 11:24 - Aug 10 by bobbyramsey

Having got rid of so many player (I've lost count) I wonder weather we are up or down on wages?
[Post edited 10 Aug 2021 11:25]


Panic not. I'm sure someone is on FM21 right now and will come back with their wages momentarily.

In all seriousness, we are in a depressed market at the moment, so the contracts we are handing out now are unlikely to be at the same levels similar players would have got two years ago.

Poll: Is it more annoying when builders

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:44 - Aug 10 with 1891 viewsWickets

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:58 - Aug 10 by gtsb1966

Aluko is a squad filler for cup games hence the one year deal.


More than likely and i find it strange that someone wants to put him down before he kicks a ball for us ! Proper fan ?
0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:48 - Aug 10 with 1870 viewsBloomBlue

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 14:45 - Aug 10 by blue62

Don't forget agents fees, no doubt a few '000 there.


It will be interesting when they publish the agents fees how this years compares with last, often players on a free result in a higher agent fee
0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 17:57 - Aug 10 with 1727 viewsJ2BLUE

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 10:28 - Aug 10 by PattiswickBlue

Players sold, not including the 10 other or more released players:
Downes - 1mil +
Dozzell - 1mil
Gibbs - 600k
Bishop - 220k
Lankester - Nominal
Drinan - Nominal
Hawkins - Nominal
= Approx 3mil

Players signed for money:
Edmundson - 750k
Chaplin - 750k
Fraser - 350k? (Guess)
Harper - 250k
Burns - 150k
Hladky - 150k? (Guess)
= Approx 2.4mil

So approximately 600k in profit from fees. However, I'm sure loan fees would have been involved in all of our loans, probably taking a significant chunk out of the 600k.


Burns £150k!?!?!?!?

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 18:27 - Aug 10 with 1664 viewsPattiswickBlue

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 17:57 - Aug 10 by J2BLUE

Burns £150k!?!?!?!?


Yeah, EADT reported that Burns was 150k and Harper was 250k in the end, after there original reports said it was 500k.
0
So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 18:28 - Aug 10 with 1657 viewsPattiswickBlue

So have we now received more in transfer fees than we've paid? on 15:07 - Aug 10 by itfcjoe

Hladky was £300k


Interesting, any idea on Fraser?
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025