Forum | First real test of this new ownership group this month imo by chrismakin

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo 14:59 - Jan 10 with 1385 views

Walton, Bonne recalls..

Feels like the Mick Jan 2015 window as a comparison..

Ambition...... lets see how much we have and buy both....

[Post edited 10 Jan 2022 15:02]

	Never be afraid to share your thoughts.
Poll:	As TWTD polls influence Ashton.. what should he have for breakfast tomorrow?
Blog:	We Need to Go Back to the Past to Go Forwards

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:05 - Jan 10 with 1307 views

bournemouthblue

Is Bonne likely to go back also?

Do we have a recall on Simpson out of interest? That's probably plan B to either resigning Bonne or a replacement

	Alcohol is the answer but I can't remember the question!
Poll:	How much for Omari

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:09 - Jan 10 with 1266 views

SitfcB

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:05 - Jan 10 by bournemouthblue
Is Bonne likely to go back also? Do we have a recall on Simpson out of interest? That's probably plan B to either resigning Bonne or a replacement

I think Bonne will tell QPR to shove it up their arse if they recall him.

	COYB
Poll:	What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog:	[Blog] One Year On

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:10 - Jan 10 with 1257 views

footers

The first real test was how they dealt with the Cook situation and who they were able to get in as his replacement. And I think that one surprised us all!

	Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll:	Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:14 - Jan 10 with 1217 views

southnorfolkblue

Not sure there’s much of a comparison tbh. We were top of the Championship not mid table in League 1. We also didn’t have a salary cap to contend with. Owners may be ambitious but there are serious constraints on what they can do.

Poll:

Our final position

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:15 - Jan 10 with 1208 views

Fixed_It

Wages will be the issue. I suspect we have very little wriggle room...

	Ready! Steady! Cook!
Poll:	Club v. Country - which comes first for you?

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:17 - Jan 10 with 1189 views

StokieBlue

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:14 - Jan 10 by southnorfolkblue
Not sure there’s much of a comparison tbh. We were top of the Championship not mid table in League 1. We also didn’t have a salary cap to contend with. Owners may be ambitious but there are serious constraints on what they can do.

Up to a point.

Cash injections rather than loans can be used to increase turnover and thus wages allowed. Would be a statement though to inject money rather than loan it (which wouldn't increase turnover for wages).

SB

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:21 - Jan 10 with 1144 views

itfcsuth

I’m not so sure it’s the first real test.

They’ve ticked a lot of boxes to date, even to the minimal things like ground reno, reinstating the community trust, up to the larger things like building an incredibly talented squad for League 1, sacking Paul Cook & appointing McKenna on a long term deal.

The Walton deal may be done, but Brighton playing games with us won’t change our approach, we want him, but only if the deal is right and works for us.

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 16:33 - Jan 10 with 1004 views

Marshalls_Mullet

Have to remember the FFP rules.

..and the big factor being the awful league position PC left us in, meaning the players have to consider the risk of still being in L1 next season.

Poll:

Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 17:56 - Jan 10 with 799 views

SitfcB

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 16:33 - Jan 10 by Marshalls_Mullet
Have to remember the FFP rules. ..and the big factor being the awful league position PC left us in, meaning the players have to consider the risk of still being in L1 next season.

Hadn’t thought of this.

Maybe Ashton does know what he’s doing.

Very smart move if this is the case, bet they were annoyed the Lincoln game got P-Ped. Would make sense as to why the teamcard points are only valid until 31st Jan.

	COYB
Poll:	What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog:	[Blog] One Year On

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 18:16 - Jan 10 with 725 views

PrideOfTheEast

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 16:33 - Jan 10 by Marshalls_Mullet
Have to remember the FFP rules. ..and the big factor being the awful league position PC left us in, meaning the players have to consider the risk of still being in L1 next season.

But the FFP rules can be circumvented by the owners putting in equity can't they? I think that is the significant difference between League One and the Championship, so our new seemingly keen to invest owners should not mind too much about that. Especially at the levels we're talking about.

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 18:16 - Jan 10 with 715 views

PrideOfTheEast

First real test of this new ownership group this month imo on 15:17 - Jan 10 by StokieBlue
Up to a point. Cash injections rather than loans can be used to increase turnover and thus wages allowed. Would be a statement though to inject money rather than loan it (which wouldn't increase turnover for wages). SB

Missed this post and posted similar.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread