| So who was taking all these photos then? 08:22 - May 24 with 1192 views | Dubtractor |
I'm assuming Dominic Cummings spent a lot of time snapping away on his phone, storing them up for future reference.
I can't think of any other reason anyone thought it was a good idea to create a photo diary of all these parties. Sorry, I mean work events. [Post edited 24 May 2022 9:38]
|  |
| |  |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 08:28 - May 24 with 1154 views | Steve_M |
I suspect various attendees took pictures throughout including junior staff. Now that Johnson has thrown a load of junior staff under the proverbial bus we might just see a whole load more. |  |
| |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 08:30 - May 24 with 1139 views | BlueBadger |
Just because they're institutionally corrupt, incompetent, bigoted and criminally inclined doesn't mean that they're particularly bright. |  |
| |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 08:39 - May 24 with 1109 views | Mookamoo |
I think some of the photos that were sent to the Met were from the official PM photographer. Which we pay for. |  | | |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 08:53 - May 24 with 1063 views | bluelagos |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 08:30 - May 24 by BlueBadger |
Just because they're institutionally corrupt, incompetent, bigoted and criminally inclined doesn't mean that they're particularly bright. |
No need to bring the police into this, the thread is about the Government. |  |
| |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 09:23 - May 24 with 1002 views | BlueBadger |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 08:39 - May 24 by Mookamoo |
I think some of the photos that were sent to the Met were from the official PM photographer. Which we pay for. |
Also worth mentioning that at least some of these pictures are from after Cummings was forced out. | |
| |
| HARRY10? (n/t) on 09:35 - May 24 with 956 views | Bloots |
|  |
| "Great to see you back on here mate, I was considering deactivating my account if you hadn’t returned" - TWTD User (Aug 2025) |
| |
| HARRY10? (n/t) on 10:06 - May 24 with 875 views | GlasgowBlue |
| HARRY10? (n/t) on 09:35 - May 24 by Bloots |
|
Is that why everyone in the picture is blurred. |  |
| |
| Fat fingers. (n/t) on 10:49 - May 24 with 818 views | Bloots |
| HARRY10? (n/t) on 10:06 - May 24 by GlasgowBlue |
Is that why everyone in the picture is blurred. |
| |
| "Great to see you back on here mate, I was considering deactivating my account if you hadn’t returned" - TWTD User (Aug 2025) |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 11:30 - May 24 with 779 views | itfcjoe |
Because they didn't think they were breaking the rules, or more accurately that the rules didn't apply to them.
They weren't sneaking around doing this, it was brazen and why wouldn't they be taking photos if that is what they normally would be doing? |  |
| |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 13:11 - May 24 with 688 views | factual_blue |
If I'd been one of the staff unsure about the legality/wisdom of these events (but subject to peer/management pressure to attend), I'd have got some photographic insurance. |  |
| |
| So who was taking all these photos then? on 13:14 - May 24 with 679 views | wkj |
Whoever was working the Ring doorbells that night probably thought their ship had come in. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
