| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw 09:34 - Aug 6 with 3253 views | Dubtractor |
Absolute carthorse.
Not seen such an agricultural display of defending for a while.
HOOOOOF! |  |
| |  |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:35 - Aug 6 with 3243 views | Kieran_Knows |
They paid £3.5m for him as well. |  |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:40 - Aug 6 with 3200 views | bournemouthblue |
Those long throws looked pretty dangerous though, we made a pigs ear of defending those |  |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:41 - Aug 6 with 3189 views | textbackup |
not as bad as the number 17, he was full dogsht |  |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:43 - Aug 6 with 3173 views | Reuser_is_God |
I must admit I be only seen the highlights but they just looked horrendous. |  |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:44 - Aug 6 with 3162 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:41 - Aug 6 by textbackup |
not as bad as the number 17, he was full dogsht |
Did make me laugh when Dozzell and Downes were challenging for headers against him! | |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:58 - Aug 6 with 3111 views | textbackup |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:43 - Aug 6 by Reuser_is_God |
I must admit I be only seen the highlights but they just looked horrendous. |
they were rubbish | |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 11:34 - Aug 6 with 2965 views | WestSussexBlue |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:58 - Aug 6 by textbackup |
they were rubbish |
Were they that bad? Genuine question as I wasn't at the game?
Can't see Harry sticking it through that all season then? What's the betting his dodgy knee starts playing up come November. |  | | |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 11:50 - Aug 6 with 2918 views | JakeITFC |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:43 - Aug 6 by Reuser_is_God |
I must admit I be only seen the highlights but they just looked horrendous. |
They were like us on a bad day, solid enough but just no quality.
You'd expect them to bring that in now, but I expect they'll be another one spending a lot of money to come midtable in this division. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 12:00 - Aug 6 with 2888 views | textbackup |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 11:34 - Aug 6 by WestSussexBlue |
Were they that bad? Genuine question as I wasn't at the game?
Can't see Harry sticking it through that all season then? What's the betting his dodgy knee starts playing up come November. |
they were really poor IMO, as jake says, us on a bad day.
if they don't spend they will be bottom 6/7 I reckon | |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 12:17 - Aug 6 with 2845 views | Jimmy86 |
I thought it was a game of 2 halves from our perspective. Brun were better than us in the first half and we were better in the 2nd and after the goal we had them u see the cosy for a good 10-15 mom spell.
Didn't think they looked as bad as what some have said. We certainly rode our luck at times. None the less it was a good performance and a great way to start the season | | | |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 13:28 - Aug 6 with 2765 views | Pilgrimblue |
What puzzled me was that Knudsen didn't try one long throw but their ones were put into danger zone whereas too many of ours last season went into keepers hands |  | | |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 19:23 - Aug 6 with 2559 views | BlueBadger |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 09:35 - Aug 6 by Kieran_Knows |
They paid £3.5m for him as well. |
Imagine that, Harry spunking a ton of cash on players regardless of their quality. |  |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 19:53 - Aug 6 with 2489 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 19:23 - Aug 6 by BlueBadger |
Imagine that, Harry spunking a ton of cash on players regardless of their quality. |
Ha! To be fair, he did have a good season with Barnsley last year, by all accounts! That said, looks like Brum have paid over the odds, which as you say, isn't a surprise! | |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 19:53 - Aug 6 with 2487 views | MJallday |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 11:34 - Aug 6 by WestSussexBlue |
Were they that bad? Genuine question as I wasn't at the game?
Can't see Harry sticking it through that all season then? What's the betting his dodgy knee starts playing up come November. |
he'll walk before xmas if he doesnt get his way |  |
| |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 20:16 - Aug 6 with 2464 views | Dubtractor |
| Birmingham's number 4 with the long throw on 19:53 - Aug 6 by Kieran_Knows |
Ha! To be fair, he did have a good season with Barnsley last year, by all accounts! That said, looks like Brum have paid over the odds, which as you say, isn't a surprise! |
It wasn't so much that he was rubbish, looked a solid defender, just not seen a player so determined to put his foot through it for a fair while. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
