Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
ONS numbers are out, they're not good 09:56 - Apr 28 with 4793 viewsSteve_M








https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesof


Poll: When are the squad numbers out?
Blog: Cycle of Hurt

0
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:03 - Apr 28 with 2305 viewsStokieBlue

Really not good.

The fact he even still has to reference that it's not a flu is worrying, people really should understand this by now but I guess some still push the equivalence.

There is also the worry that the infection levels of the population could actually be quite low. It was cited on here yesterday that the government are working on rates between 2% and 5% of the population having been infected thus far which isn't too far from the German study. At the moment we simply don't know though.

If that is the case then the deaths are from a relatively small number of infections. More data is needed.

SB
0
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:04 - Apr 28 with 2266 viewsBluefish

If the virus went away today it would be interesting to see the impact on an annual average. Many of the care home ones might not have lasted the year and monthly figures might be less than the normal average for the rest of the year plus less RTAs deaths at work etc.

Poll: Who has performed the worst but oddly loved the most?
Blog: [Blog] Long Live King George

0
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:12 - Apr 28 with 2229 viewshomer_123

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:03 - Apr 28 by StokieBlue

Really not good.

The fact he even still has to reference that it's not a flu is worrying, people really should understand this by now but I guess some still push the equivalence.

There is also the worry that the infection levels of the population could actually be quite low. It was cited on here yesterday that the government are working on rates between 2% and 5% of the population having been infected thus far which isn't too far from the German study. At the moment we simply don't know though.

If that is the case then the deaths are from a relatively small number of infections. More data is needed.

SB


Without wanting to be overtly negative.

My sense is that it feels like we are gearing up for a significant re-bound when restrictions are lifted.

I note that New Zealand are talking positively about their situation and the numbers from China are still very 'positive' (if one can trust such figures). But given the huge levels of uncertainty and knowledge around the virus - I do fear a significant bounce not just here but elsewhere.

We appear to be neither trying to wipe it out with a total lockdown nor fully looking at herd immunity.

I'm very likely to be wrong but that's my sense.

Ade Akinbiyi couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo...
Poll: As things stand, how confident are you we will get promoted this season?

0
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:13 - Apr 28 with 2214 viewsgordon

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:03 - Apr 28 by StokieBlue

Really not good.

The fact he even still has to reference that it's not a flu is worrying, people really should understand this by now but I guess some still push the equivalence.

There is also the worry that the infection levels of the population could actually be quite low. It was cited on here yesterday that the government are working on rates between 2% and 5% of the population having been infected thus far which isn't too far from the German study. At the moment we simply don't know though.

If that is the case then the deaths are from a relatively small number of infections. More data is needed.

SB


The reference to flu is a nod to the fact that SAGE/Government were basing decision-making on an influenza pandemic model for too long, which is why our early decision-making looks odd now.
0
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:22 - Apr 28 with 2171 viewsNotSure

So looking at the spreadsheet …

11,854 extra deaths in week ending 17th April.
8,758 Deaths where Covid-19 mentioned on the death certificate (And 86% where Covid-19 was underlying cause).
Which leaves us with 3,096 extra unexplained deaths when comparing against the 5 year average.

And it's the 3.096 which worries me the most.
It appears the current lock down is causing extra deaths.
-7
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:25 - Apr 28 with 2139 viewsBlueBadger

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:22 - Apr 28 by NotSure

So looking at the spreadsheet …

11,854 extra deaths in week ending 17th April.
8,758 Deaths where Covid-19 mentioned on the death certificate (And 86% where Covid-19 was underlying cause).
Which leaves us with 3,096 extra unexplained deaths when comparing against the 5 year average.

And it's the 3.096 which worries me the most.
It appears the current lock down is causing extra deaths.


Just out of interest, which member of your household is going to give up their life for you in order that you can go to the pub?

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

3
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:26 - Apr 28 with 2130 viewsgordon

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:12 - Apr 28 by homer_123

Without wanting to be overtly negative.

My sense is that it feels like we are gearing up for a significant re-bound when restrictions are lifted.

I note that New Zealand are talking positively about their situation and the numbers from China are still very 'positive' (if one can trust such figures). But given the huge levels of uncertainty and knowledge around the virus - I do fear a significant bounce not just here but elsewhere.

We appear to be neither trying to wipe it out with a total lockdown nor fully looking at herd immunity.

I'm very likely to be wrong but that's my sense.


We are stuck between the knowledge that our initial strategy allowed infection rates to spread much higher than was necessary, but IF* the penetration is now less than say 15%, then the initial plan that we could let the virus pass through the population while protecting the vulnerable is not feasible.

But, to pivot from allowing controlled spread to a strategy of aggressively trying to go after the virus and suppress every infection/cluster is going to be very tough now, because we've let infections spread to a level that it will be a long time before the lockdown gets numbers down to a level that we could realistically track and isolate each and every case.

Negativity about the situation is entirely rational, in my opinion, it's a cock-up of pretty significant proportions.
2
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:27 - Apr 28 with 2116 viewssparks

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:22 - Apr 28 by NotSure

So looking at the spreadsheet …

11,854 extra deaths in week ending 17th April.
8,758 Deaths where Covid-19 mentioned on the death certificate (And 86% where Covid-19 was underlying cause).
Which leaves us with 3,096 extra unexplained deaths when comparing against the 5 year average.

And it's the 3.096 which worries me the most.
It appears the current lock down is causing extra deaths.


Argument from ignorance fallacy.

The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it. (Sir Terry Pratchett)
Poll: Is Fred drunk this morning?

0
Login to get fewer ads

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:29 - Apr 28 with 2104 viewsBlueBadger

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:22 - Apr 28 by NotSure

So looking at the spreadsheet …

11,854 extra deaths in week ending 17th April.
8,758 Deaths where Covid-19 mentioned on the death certificate (And 86% where Covid-19 was underlying cause).
Which leaves us with 3,096 extra unexplained deaths when comparing against the 5 year average.

And it's the 3.096 which worries me the most.
It appears the current lock down is causing extra deaths.


You'd likely have a much, much, much higher covid-attributed deaths figure though.

But hey, you'd be able to go to the pub.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

1
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:30 - Apr 28 with 2093 viewsWeWereZombies

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:12 - Apr 28 by homer_123

Without wanting to be overtly negative.

My sense is that it feels like we are gearing up for a significant re-bound when restrictions are lifted.

I note that New Zealand are talking positively about their situation and the numbers from China are still very 'positive' (if one can trust such figures). But given the huge levels of uncertainty and knowledge around the virus - I do fear a significant bounce not just here but elsewhere.

We appear to be neither trying to wipe it out with a total lockdown nor fully looking at herd immunity.

I'm very likely to be wrong but that's my sense.


'the numbers from China are still very 'positive' (if one can trust such figures).'

Or if we can get our heads around how other nations do things differently. Not about China, but this morning's BBC article on India cites their apparent lower infection and death rate as having a lack of notification as a factor:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-52435463

'"A lot of people get some medical attention over time, return and die at home in India," says Dr Jha.'

'Many of India's dead are cremated in the open in large swathes of the countryside. Funeral services cater only to a small sliver of the population.'

There are World Health Organisation professionals working in China and India so there is not a complete lack of visibility. We must be careful not to dismiss data out of hand but getting an even playing field on these numbers may never happen.

Poll: What was in Wes Burns' imaginary cup of tea ?

0
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:30 - Apr 28 with 2092 viewsNotSure

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:25 - Apr 28 by BlueBadger

Just out of interest, which member of your household is going to give up their life for you in order that you can go to the pub?


I don't want to go to the pub. They are currently correctly closed.
What a strange question.
0
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:31 - Apr 28 with 2090 viewsfooters

So having looked at the numbers, what I've surmised is that it's probably OK to flaunt the lockdown and invite people round so long as they sit in the garden. Is that correct?

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

2
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:31 - Apr 28 with 2081 viewsNotSure

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:27 - Apr 28 by sparks

Argument from ignorance fallacy.


Really, are you going to explain the extra deaths to me or are we all just making pointless replies that add nothing.
0
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:34 - Apr 28 with 2049 viewsBlueBadger

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:31 - Apr 28 by NotSure

Really, are you going to explain the extra deaths to me or are we all just making pointless replies that add nothing.


An awful lot are likely to be untested suspected covids - people living alone who are unwell, care home residents, people's vulnerable relatives. You know, the ones you were happy to sacrifice so you could go and get a big mac.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

1
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:37 - Apr 28 with 2021 viewsNotSure

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:34 - Apr 28 by BlueBadger

An awful lot are likely to be untested suspected covids - people living alone who are unwell, care home residents, people's vulnerable relatives. You know, the ones you were happy to sacrifice so you could go and get a big mac.


Again a good start to your argument and you make some good points.
I'm assuming coroners are overworked at present and Covid-19 cases will be missed.

But you just couldn't help yourself at the end and made up another lie about me.
-4
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:39 - Apr 28 with 2010 viewsfactual_blue

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:30 - Apr 28 by NotSure

I don't want to go to the pub. They are currently correctly closed.
What a strange question.


It's not a strange question to ask somebody who posts this

This pressure to end the lockdown by NotSure 27 Apr 2020 9:28
You talk of ten of thousands of deaths.
I know this is unpleasant to say but the vast majority of these people who died were economically inactive. Every death is a tragedy but this disease is currently not killing many young people.

My household doesn't care about this lockdown anymore and just like my neighbours on either side we are going out when we want and accepting visitors.


Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Best at sniping
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

4
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:40 - Apr 28 with 2002 viewsBlueBadger

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:37 - Apr 28 by NotSure

Again a good start to your argument and you make some good points.
I'm assuming coroners are overworked at present and Covid-19 cases will be missed.

But you just couldn't help yourself at the end and made up another lie about me.


Sorry, I've re-read what you said and I should have said 'people you were happy to sacrifice so your mates could come round to play'.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

5
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:45 - Apr 28 with 1959 viewsfactual_blue

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:31 - Apr 28 by footers

So having looked at the numbers, what I've surmised is that it's probably OK to flaunt the lockdown and invite people round so long as they sit in the garden. Is that correct?


I'm on my way. Fire up the BBQ.

Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Best at sniping
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

1
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:49 - Apr 28 with 1938 viewsNotSure

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:40 - Apr 28 by BlueBadger

Sorry, I've re-read what you said and I should have said 'people you were happy to sacrifice so your mates could come round to play'.


That's better. Apology accepted.
-2
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:51 - Apr 28 with 1935 viewsStokieBlue

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:22 - Apr 28 by NotSure

So looking at the spreadsheet …

11,854 extra deaths in week ending 17th April.
8,758 Deaths where Covid-19 mentioned on the death certificate (And 86% where Covid-19 was underlying cause).
Which leaves us with 3,096 extra unexplained deaths when comparing against the 5 year average.

And it's the 3.096 which worries me the most.
It appears the current lock down is causing extra deaths.


The continual attempts to justify your selfish decision to ignore the lockdown are pathetic.

Just follow the rules you numpty.

SB
[Post edited 28 Apr 2020 10:52]
6
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:53 - Apr 28 with 1910 viewsBlueBadger

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:51 - Apr 28 by StokieBlue

The continual attempts to justify your selfish decision to ignore the lockdown are pathetic.

Just follow the rules you numpty.

SB
[Post edited 28 Apr 2020 10:52]


It's almost admirable that a tiny proportion of dickheads STILL persist in trying this one in a desperate attempt to look edgy. Even Banksy's largely given up.
The sad thing is, none of these CIL tribute acts have have the level of articulacy and literacy that she did.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

1
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:56 - Apr 28 with 1901 viewsfactual_blue

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:25 - Apr 28 by BlueBadger

Just out of interest, which member of your household is going to give up their life for you in order that you can go to the pub?


Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his relative to go to the pub.

Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Best at sniping
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

4
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:56 - Apr 28 with 1897 viewsfooters

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:45 - Apr 28 by factual_blue

I'm on my way. Fire up the BBQ.


Perfect weather for it too. I'll save you a soggy sausage. Don't forget to bring Mrs Facters and the neighbours as well.

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

1
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:58 - Apr 28 with 1889 viewsfactual_blue

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:56 - Apr 28 by footers

Perfect weather for it too. I'll save you a soggy sausage. Don't forget to bring Mrs Facters and the neighbours as well.


I look forward to your soggy sausage.

Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Best at sniping
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

1
ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 11:00 - Apr 28 with 1883 viewssparks

ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 10:31 - Apr 28 by NotSure

Really, are you going to explain the extra deaths to me or are we all just making pointless replies that add nothing.


That is also an argument from ignorance fallacy.

When you say "here is something. I dont know of another explanation, so it must be this" you are committing one of the most obvious fallacies imaginable. It is not for others to offer you explanations.

The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it. (Sir Terry Pratchett)
Poll: Is Fred drunk this morning?

1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025