| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:13 - Apr 28 with 800 views | BlueBadger |
Seriously Squiddy, what are you hoping to prove by running with this utter bullsh1t? |  |
|  |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:13 - Apr 28 with 802 views | bluelagos |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:10 - Apr 28 by NotSure |
1. You have proof that this strain of coronavirus will be different to all of the others.
2. Because it's spring and April.
And how do you know it will kill people?
We should certainly still support the old and vulnerable who want to isolate. |
Now you rather getting rather silly (if trolling) or utterly stupid if you are not.
Neither is a good look tbh. |  |
| |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:14 - Apr 28 with 800 views | footers |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:10 - Apr 28 by NotSure |
1. You have proof that this strain of coronavirus will be different to all of the others.
2. Because it's spring and April.
And how do you know it will kill people?
We should certainly still support the old and vulnerable who want to isolate. |
Have you been outside today? It's freezing and pissing it down. |  |
| |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:15 - Apr 28 with 797 views | jeera |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:14 - Apr 28 by footers |
Have you been outside today? It's freezing and pissing it down. |
Exactly.
Summer-like. |  |
| |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:16 - Apr 28 with 794 views | NotSure |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:06 - Apr 28 by sparks |
You are either a troll (which is appallingly bad taste in the circumstances- people reading this board will be losing people close to them or will be genuinely affected).
Or you are genuinely ignorant and so proud of it, you will not even engage honestly and properly with the corrections and points that are put to you.
Either way, just fecking stop. |
This website is appalling if you have a different view.
You're basically saying to me "Stop posting because I disagree with you".
I'd love to debate this, I'm not telling anyone what to do, just giving my opinion on lockdown. I'm honestly astonished that I quoted ONS figures and linked to scientific journals and I'm being accused of trolling! |  | | |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:17 - Apr 28 with 781 views | BlueBadger |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 14:03 - Apr 28 by StokieBlue |
He's attempting to downplay C19, as he has done for 2 months now.
He will then claim he isn't.
SB |
MY favourite bit was when he tried to claim it was nothing to worry about because some people on instagram and YouTube were paid money to promote a message about it. As if that's not at all how the advertising and marketing industry works. | |
| |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:19 - Apr 28 with 768 views | monytowbray |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 15:47 - Apr 28 by GlasgowBlue |
Who your lone upvoter is tells you all you need to know about the nonsense you are posting. |
I think Blue Squid is talking nonsense to be fair. But I just thought it would be amusing to upvote a post that is nothing but personal abuse and question dodging like you two like to do to me, say nothing and see what happens.
Thanks for proving my point. It’s annoying and petty when you’re on the receiving end isn’t it?!
Also, I like your new angle of not understanding what gaslighting is. That’s a favourite.
Perhaps I should make a joke about your admitted daytime drinking again so you can run off to Phil crying? Because it seems from two threads today you apply very different standards of conduct to yourself than you do others. |  |
| |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:25 - Apr 28 with 743 views | monytowbray |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:17 - Apr 28 by BlueBadger |
MY favourite bit was when he tried to claim it was nothing to worry about because some people on instagram and YouTube were paid money to promote a message about it. As if that's not at all how the advertising and marketing industry works. |
To be fair taking money to say literally ANYTHING is exactly how influencer marketing works though. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:27 - Apr 28 with 738 views | BlueBadger |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:25 - Apr 28 by monytowbray |
To be fair taking money to say literally ANYTHING is exactly how influencer marketing works though. |
The word 'influencer' is pretty superfluous here, to be fair. | |
| |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:28 - Apr 28 with 736 views | monytowbray |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:27 - Apr 28 by BlueBadger |
The word 'influencer' is pretty superfluous here, to be fair. |
It basically means “I am an Instagrammer with enough followers to get paid to say stuff”.
Pretty easy living if you can make it. | |
| |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:34 - Apr 28 with 724 views | Bluesquid |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:17 - Apr 28 by BlueBadger |
MY favourite bit was when he tried to claim it was nothing to worry about because some people on instagram and YouTube were paid money to promote a message about it. As if that's not at all how the advertising and marketing industry works. |
My word, that's low even for you Badger.
Here is what i stated on page one of that thread -
"C-19 is very real and very dangerous"
My issue was about transparency and influencers and that i was simply not aware that the WHO employed influencers.
But it looks like this 'fitting up' of posters is a pretty contagious affair.
I saw you mentioned CIL earlier, well she stopped posting here precisely because of the slippery tactics you've just employed on me. [Post edited 28 Apr 2020 16:37]
|  | | |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:42 - Apr 28 with 710 views | SpruceMoose |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:34 - Apr 28 by Bluesquid |
My word, that's low even for you Badger.
Here is what i stated on page one of that thread -
"C-19 is very real and very dangerous"
My issue was about transparency and influencers and that i was simply not aware that the WHO employed influencers.
But it looks like this 'fitting up' of posters is a pretty contagious affair.
I saw you mentioned CIL earlier, well she stopped posting here precisely because of the slippery tactics you've just employed on me. [Post edited 28 Apr 2020 16:37]
|
Oh no! She's gone?! What a tragedy. How will we cope with one less dangerous loon labouring under a massive Dunning-Kruger effect around these parts?! |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:58 - Apr 28 with 680 views | eireblue |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 15:52 - Apr 28 by Bluesquid |
You're disputing the data presented by the Office Of National Statistics? |
Crikey, did I do that, let me go and check.
Hmmm, no, I didn’t.
Okay, this balances quite well, NotSure has fallacies covered, you can cover topics on non-comprehension. |  | | |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 17:02 - Apr 28 with 660 views | Bluesquid |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:58 - Apr 28 by eireblue |
Crikey, did I do that, let me go and check.
Hmmm, no, I didn’t.
Okay, this balances quite well, NotSure has fallacies covered, you can cover topics on non-comprehension. |
Yes i made that post in error but didn't edit it, so apologies for that. | | | |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 17:33 - Apr 28 with 624 views | manchego |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 15:44 - Apr 28 by Bluesquid |
Yes and i agree with all of that, my post was in regard to the excess deaths in 1999/00 which certainly took me by surprise. |
Yes it was a large number of Flu deaths in 1999/2000.
This is worse.
To summarise the summary I wrote:
· Covid-19 is more likely to cause severe illness or death.
· Flu is a much older virus, and several effective antiviral treatments and vaccines are available. There are no treatments or vaccines yet available for Covid-19. |  | | |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 17:44 - Apr 28 with 614 views | sparks |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:16 - Apr 28 by NotSure |
This website is appalling if you have a different view.
You're basically saying to me "Stop posting because I disagree with you".
I'd love to debate this, I'm not telling anyone what to do, just giving my opinion on lockdown. I'm honestly astonished that I quoted ONS figures and linked to scientific journals and I'm being accused of trolling! |
"different view" my arse. Its a demonstrably ignorant view.
Your opinion is ignorant and obnoxious. It is not deserving of respect . the existence of two views, does not make them equally valid.
The summer thing doesnt help. Iran had a massive issue... Its quite warm there...
Rhino and corona viruses are less prevalent in summer because people spend less time mixing in enclosed spaces, and because UV light reduces the time the viruses survive on surfaces. We DO NOT KNOW the extent to which UV will impact on this virus, and its contagiousness is clearly very significant. |  |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 17:46 - Apr 28 with 611 views | sparks |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:10 - Apr 28 by NotSure |
1. You have proof that this strain of coronavirus will be different to all of the others.
2. Because it's spring and April.
And how do you know it will kill people?
We should certainly still support the old and vulnerable who want to isolate. |
Another fallacy.
This is one you need to get to grips with if you ever want to engage with vaguely intelligent people. You make an assertion... It does not become right, if the other party doesn't offer an alternative.
Answering "you have proof that this strain will be different" is fallacious. | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 17:48 - Apr 28 with 608 views | sparks |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:12 - Apr 28 by jeera |
1. What are you talking about?
2. You think it will know the date and suddenly disappear then? The weather's been summer-like for a while.
How do I know it will kill people?
Are you some kind of idiot? |
1. He is trying to say this:
It was put to him that we do not know what, if any, impact the summer will have on UK Cov-Sars2 virus cases.
He therefore demands to know whether people have proof that it will NOT be significantly affected. In the absence of such proof, he appears to believe that one can conclude that Summer will do the trick.
Its a clear fallacy. | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 18:09 - Apr 28 with 588 views | eireblue |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 16:12 - Apr 28 by footers |
How grown-up of you. Enjoy your sandpapering. |
Look, I think you should be a bit more appreciative of GB’s efforts here.
He has popped on to here, to police up votes, and have a pop at a poster, whilst having a pop at all the usual posters for popping at each other.
He is a very busy man with businesses to manage and wood to sand.
We have already lost Gav, what will become of this place without appropriate uppie and popping policing. | | | |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 18:18 - Apr 28 with 576 views | monytowbray |
| ONS numbers are out, they're not good on 18:09 - Apr 28 by eireblue |
Look, I think you should be a bit more appreciative of GB’s efforts here.
He has popped on to here, to police up votes, and have a pop at a poster, whilst having a pop at all the usual posters for popping at each other.
He is a very busy man with businesses to manage and wood to sand.
We have already lost Gav, what will become of this place without appropriate uppie and popping policing. |
It’s important for me to know which of my posts have been graded as either “political point scoring”, being a dick or “troll bait” too.
Imagine if the Right Wing Fence Sitting Intellect Club applied their swervey rage to the people on this board who actually deserve it? Wouldn’t that be nice? There’s deffo been a recent influx of previously banned posters on here. You can guess most of them (alas it’s tougher to tell which posters they are) by their offence there are too many #leftybumfests here. | |
| |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 18:37 - Apr 28 with 558 views | BLUEGOLD |
| You have to make this assumption really..... on 16:16 - Apr 28 by NotSure |
This website is appalling if you have a different view.
You're basically saying to me "Stop posting because I disagree with you".
I'd love to debate this, I'm not telling anyone what to do, just giving my opinion on lockdown. I'm honestly astonished that I quoted ONS figures and linked to scientific journals and I'm being accused of trolling! |
I’ve read your posts and you are a prize tool.
I Am Sure
Of that | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
