| Nors 15:59 - Dec 6 with 2213 views | chrismakin |
With everyone assuming that Ashton stopped him being available.
Wonder now if Nors might be feeling his good beer drinking chum was making stuff up about hands being tied....
I guess we will never know. |  |
| |  |
| Nors on 16:01 - Dec 6 with 1922 views | wkj |
And hopefully, we will never care. |  |
| |
| Nors on 16:02 - Dec 6 with 1919 views | J2BLUE |
You seem on an absolute mission lately to take shots at everyone.
You were Cook's biggest fan a matter of weeks ago. |  |
| |
| Nors on 16:08 - Dec 6 with 1883 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 16:02 - Dec 6 by J2BLUE |
You seem on an absolute mission lately to take shots at everyone.
You were Cook's biggest fan a matter of weeks ago. |
Could you provide examples. Think you've got confused with others j2. No shots to anyone. What a rather bizarre reply.
Oh and it's been a long long time since I was still the avid PC fan. Maybe time is different for you. I dunno. But bizarre reply to the OP. | |
| |
| Nors on 16:23 - Dec 6 with 1768 views | itfcsuth |
What are you talking about - 'his good beer drinking chum'?
Are you just making things up? |  | | |
| Nors on 16:26 - Dec 6 with 1750 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 16:23 - Dec 6 by itfcsuth |
What are you talking about - 'his good beer drinking chum'?
Are you just making things up? |
Nors likes a beer. PC likes a beer. Both beer drinkers pcs a good bloke. Easy to get on with. So yeah beer drinking chum. | |
| |
| Nors on 16:27 - Dec 6 with 1736 views | J2BLUE |
| Nors on 16:08 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Could you provide examples. Think you've got confused with others j2. No shots to anyone. What a rather bizarre reply.
Oh and it's been a long long time since I was still the avid PC fan. Maybe time is different for you. I dunno. But bizarre reply to the OP. |
I don't think so.
Might be the way i'm reading it but your posts have seemed darker. Angrier.
Again, sometimes it's hard to tell how things were written in plain text so I may be wrong. | |
| |
| Nors on 16:33 - Dec 6 with 1689 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 16:27 - Dec 6 by J2BLUE |
I don't think so.
Might be the way i'm reading it but your posts have seemed darker. Angrier.
Again, sometimes it's hard to tell how things were written in plain text so I may be wrong. |
Fair enough. But no not a darker tone. Especially this one.
I too assumed based on nors tweet that he'd been banished from 1st team squad for off field stuff.. now if course deeming if indeed ashton is telling the truth and he has been available... then has PC Sold nors a duff line and used M/A as a reason for not using Nors. Afterall football wise norwood has always been solid regardless of the off field stuff. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Nors on 16:33 - Dec 6 with 1682 views | wkj |
| Nors on 16:26 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Nors likes a beer. PC likes a beer. Both beer drinkers pcs a good bloke. Easy to get on with. So yeah beer drinking chum. |
So, conjecture again. Well done, you've got your daily dose of attention. Well played. | |
| |
| Nors on 16:37 - Dec 6 with 1663 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 16:33 - Dec 6 by wkj |
So, conjecture again. Well done, you've got your daily dose of attention. Well played. |
Well you could have contributed to the OP. Rather than attempt your own daily dose of attention perhaps?
What are your thoughts WKJ. Do you think M/A did indeed make nors unavailable or do you think PC used M/A as a reason for not selecting him. It's OK to get involved in a discussion. Might not get you an uppy like piling in on me tho. But give it a go. | |
| |
| Nors on 16:43 - Dec 6 with 1606 views | Churchman |
| Nors on 16:26 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Nors likes a beer. PC likes a beer. Both beer drinkers pcs a good bloke. Easy to get on with. So yeah beer drinking chum. |
That’s bizarre! I like a beer. In fact I like lots of beers sometimes but I’ve never met or would wish to meet Norwood or Cook. I’d buy Cook a beer if he tottered into my local, but there is no way he would be a ‘beer drinking chum’. |  | | |
| Nors on 16:45 - Dec 6 with 1598 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 16:43 - Dec 6 by Churchman |
That’s bizarre! I like a beer. In fact I like lots of beers sometimes but I’ve never met or would wish to meet Norwood or Cook. I’d buy Cook a beer if he tottered into my local, but there is no way he would be a ‘beer drinking chum’. |
I refer to anyone who likes a beer a beer drinking chum. You like a beer. I like a beer. Anyone who likes a beer. Beer drinking chums.
Each to their own if you see it differently | |
| |
| Nors on 16:54 - Dec 6 with 1542 views | Sarge |
| Nors on 16:08 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Could you provide examples. Think you've got confused with others j2. No shots to anyone. What a rather bizarre reply.
Oh and it's been a long long time since I was still the avid PC fan. Maybe time is different for you. I dunno. But bizarre reply to the OP. |
To be entirely fair, I wouldn’t call 2.5 weeks a long time. Even if it was 29 pages of contributions back
2 defeats in 15 games by chrismakin 17 Nov 2021 18:36Only 4 points off the latter 2 clubs
And with leam he was already at the club so not sure why you've included him lol he'd coached the side he then managed so hardly a big change there. And signed some players he'd already coached and who'd played with others already in the team.
The need to still see it as failure imo is getting silly now.
|  | | |
| Nors on 16:59 - Dec 6 with 1497 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 16:54 - Dec 6 by Sarge |
To be entirely fair, I wouldn’t call 2.5 weeks a long time. Even if it was 29 pages of contributions back
2 defeats in 15 games by chrismakin 17 Nov 2021 18:36Only 4 points off the latter 2 clubs
And with leam he was already at the club so not sure why you've included him lol he'd coached the side he then managed so hardly a big change there. And signed some players he'd already coached and who'd played with others already in the team.
The need to still see it as failure imo is getting silly now.
|
Lots of games since sarge. As I've said since
Its funny. People repeat it like I'm blind to the fact I defended PC. I did indeed for along long time. For to long clearly. Don't know how long you want me to hold hands up for, is there a time limit? [Post edited 6 Dec 2021 17:00]
| |
| |
| Nors on 17:03 - Dec 6 with 1464 views | Zx1988 |
| Nors on 16:37 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Well you could have contributed to the OP. Rather than attempt your own daily dose of attention perhaps?
What are your thoughts WKJ. Do you think M/A did indeed make nors unavailable or do you think PC used M/A as a reason for not selecting him. It's OK to get involved in a discussion. Might not get you an uppy like piling in on me tho. But give it a go. |
I don't believe MA. He's chosen his words very carefully.
He could very easily have said that Norwood was always available for selection. He didn't. | |
| |
| Nors on 19:04 - Dec 6 with 1298 views | wkj |
| Nors on 16:37 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Well you could have contributed to the OP. Rather than attempt your own daily dose of attention perhaps?
What are your thoughts WKJ. Do you think M/A did indeed make nors unavailable or do you think PC used M/A as a reason for not selecting him. It's OK to get involved in a discussion. Might not get you an uppy like piling in on me tho. But give it a go. |
There are no thoughts to be had when your post is steeped with conjecture. Provide evidence that Cook and Norwood were going out on the piss together, then you have a discussion. | |
| |
| Nors on 19:10 - Dec 6 with 1256 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 19:04 - Dec 6 by wkj |
There are no thoughts to be had when your post is steeped with conjecture. Provide evidence that Cook and Norwood were going out on the piss together, then you have a discussion. |
Didn't say they did.
There's is something you can discuss within the OP. Shouldn't need to have to point it out
Interesting wk. You're doing what you accused me of once. Funny how it swings round. | |
| |
| Nors on 19:13 - Dec 6 with 1226 views | wkj |
| Nors on 19:10 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Didn't say they did.
There's is something you can discuss within the OP. Shouldn't need to have to point it out
Interesting wk. You're doing what you accused me of once. Funny how it swings round. |
Im not doing anything but pointing out your post is akin to people that make crap up on the internet to start crazy conspiracy theories.
"Wonder now if Nors might be feeling his good beer drinking chum was making stuff up about hands being tied...."
The non conjecture version
"Wonder now if Norwoods might be feeling now IF Cook was making stuff up about his hands being tied...."
There is a huge difference there, the later being much clearer and accurate.
"I didn't say that" is not a defense when your OP was deliberately unclear and ambiguous. [Post edited 6 Dec 2021 19:15]
| |
| |
| Nors on 19:16 - Dec 6 with 1206 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 19:13 - Dec 6 by wkj |
Im not doing anything but pointing out your post is akin to people that make crap up on the internet to start crazy conspiracy theories.
"Wonder now if Nors might be feeling his good beer drinking chum was making stuff up about hands being tied...."
The non conjecture version
"Wonder now if Norwoods might be feeling now IF Cook was making stuff up about his hands being tied...."
There is a huge difference there, the later being much clearer and accurate.
"I didn't say that" is not a defense when your OP was deliberately unclear and ambiguous. [Post edited 6 Dec 2021 19:15]
|
Both drink beer. Beer drinking chums your version and mine still accurate. | |
| |
| Nors on 19:18 - Dec 6 with 1188 views | wkj |
| Nors on 19:16 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Both drink beer. Beer drinking chums your version and mine still accurate. |
That is superfluous and you know it. This is your chance to actually say - you know what - yeah, I didn't really need to put that in - it didn't really add anything to the point I was trying to make - you know, be a decent human being about it. [Post edited 6 Dec 2021 19:19]
| |
| |
| Nors on 19:51 - Dec 6 with 1081 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Nors on 19:16 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Both drink beer. Beer drinking chums your version and mine still accurate. |
So because they both drink beer thy must be beer drinking chums.
I like beer. I have people who work for me who like beer. We don't socialise.
You're just making things up again. |  |
| |
| Nors on 19:53 - Dec 6 with 1062 views | clive_baker |
| Nors on 19:16 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Both drink beer. Beer drinking chums your version and mine still accurate. |
You don't half spout some sh1t. |  |
| |
| Nors on 19:54 - Dec 6 with 1056 views | chrismakin |
| Nors on 19:51 - Dec 6 by GlasgowBlue |
So because they both drink beer thy must be beer drinking chums.
I like beer. I have people who work for me who like beer. We don't socialise.
You're just making things up again. |
Didn't say they socialised.
I know the Joe thread stopped. Need no to try turn another one into something it's not. You define the sentence as something different to me, that's fine. | |
| |
| Nors on 20:07 - Dec 6 with 991 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Nors on 19:54 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
Didn't say they socialised.
I know the Joe thread stopped. Need no to try turn another one into something it's not. You define the sentence as something different to me, that's fine. |
Beer drinking chums tend to drink beer together. Otherwise they are just two people who happen to like beer. | |
| |
| Nors on 20:10 - Dec 6 with 972 views | Dyland |
| Nors on 16:45 - Dec 6 by chrismakin |
I refer to anyone who likes a beer a beer drinking chum. You like a beer. I like a beer. Anyone who likes a beer. Beer drinking chums.
Each to their own if you see it differently |
ffs
Really? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
