| Nixon says… 11:42 - Jul 14 with 4833 views | SitfcB |
Rushworth deal fell through because we wanted a permanent deal but Brighton only wanted a loan.
‘Brighton and Ipswich failed to thrash out a deal for
keeper Carl Rushworth - because of a row over making
it a loan or a buy.
The Tractor Boys wanted Rushworth to be their number
one as revealed and would have liked to buy him for the
Premier League campaign.
However the Seagulls are concerned that they may be
giving away a future England cap and would have
prefered a loan and that halted the transfer’ [Post edited 14 Jul 2024 12:12]
|  |
| |  |
| Nixon say… on 12:10 - Jul 14 with 4394 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
I think he would've been a very good signing, but not keen on a loan, would rather have Muric on a perm deal. |  |
| |
| Nixon says… on 12:31 - Jul 14 with 4037 views | Horsham |
‘Row’ wonder what sort of row that was. |  | | |
| Nixon says… on 12:36 - Jul 14 with 3964 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Nixon says… on 12:31 - Jul 14 by Horsham |
‘Row’ wonder what sort of row that was. |
I’ll send my Mrs to negotiate |  |
| |
| Nixon says… on 12:36 - Jul 14 with 3953 views | burnbudgiesburn |
I feel Muric suits our style a lot more.
Rushworth nowhere near good enough with his feet and there's no chance he plays as high up the pitch either. |  | | |
| Nixon says… on 12:38 - Jul 14 with 3924 views | ArnieM |
You mean the same Brighton who couldn’t tempt our manager, and don’t want us to be a threat to them in the PL, Brighton? |  |
| |
| Nixon says… on 12:42 - Jul 14 with 3836 views | NedPlimpton |
"concerned they may be giving away a future England cap
Why would they care about whether he plays for England or not? Surely all that matters is if he's going to be a future Brighton no.1 or not |  | | |
| Nixon says… on 12:45 - Jul 14 with 3771 views | Swansea_Blue |
If he was our first choice target, a loan would have been fine as long as there wasn’t a recall option. Seems odd to not explore that unless we’ve got higher priority PL loan targets (only allowed 2 aren’t we?). |  |
| |
| Nixon says… on 12:48 - Jul 14 with 3704 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Nixon says… on 12:42 - Jul 14 by NedPlimpton |
"concerned they may be giving away a future England cap
Why would they care about whether he plays for England or not? Surely all that matters is if he's going to be a future Brighton no.1 or not |
Brighton , thanks to player trading, make a profit.
If he was called up by England it would increase his value, hence they wanted it to be a loan.
Suspect Ashton & McKenna already have loan targets in mind and limited to just two.
Pleased we have walked away, rather than disrupt our planning. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Nixon says… on 12:50 - Jul 14 with 3664 views | Wickets |
| Nixon says… on 12:42 - Jul 14 by NedPlimpton |
"concerned they may be giving away a future England cap
Why would they care about whether he plays for England or not? Surely all that matters is if he's going to be a future Brighton no.1 or not |
Maybe effects his sell on value ? |  | | |
| Nixon says… on 12:57 - Jul 14 with 3494 views | NedPlimpton |
| Nixon says… on 12:48 - Jul 14 by Pinewoodblue |
Brighton , thanks to player trading, make a profit.
If he was called up by England it would increase his value, hence they wanted it to be a loan.
Suspect Ashton & McKenna already have loan targets in mind and limited to just two.
Pleased we have walked away, rather than disrupt our planning. |
Yeah, hadn't considered the impact on value. Still feels like a weird way of wording it
"Brighton are concerned about selling someone who may be worth a shed load more in the future" would have sufficed | | | |
| Nixon says… on 12:59 - Jul 14 with 3428 views | Denny32 |
| Nixon says… on 12:50 - Jul 14 by Wickets |
Maybe effects his sell on value ? |
Il take muric all day .from what I've heard and seen about him..he's definitely for our system..a absolute giant..Good with feet ..Great reflexes good shot stopper good distribution.. yes he's had a few gaffes but what good keeper doesn't...get him in .. what ever happens Walton I don't know . He definitely won't want to be no 2 again .we will jst have to get in a decent 2 that doesn't mind warming the bench | | | |
| Nixon says… on 13:18 - Jul 14 with 3043 views | pointofblue |
| Nixon says… on 12:57 - Jul 14 by NedPlimpton |
Yeah, hadn't considered the impact on value. Still feels like a weird way of wording it
"Brighton are concerned about selling someone who may be worth a shed load more in the future" would have sufficed |
He’d only be capped by England if he gets game time for Brighton. | |
| |
| Nixon says… on 15:38 - Jul 14 with 2061 views | Dubtractor |
| Nixon says… on 12:48 - Jul 14 by Pinewoodblue |
Brighton , thanks to player trading, make a profit.
If he was called up by England it would increase his value, hence they wanted it to be a loan.
Suspect Ashton & McKenna already have loan targets in mind and limited to just two.
Pleased we have walked away, rather than disrupt our planning. |
On that loan point - in my eyes it's essential that we get really impressive/game changing players with our 2 loan slots, and I don't think that can include a keeper tbh. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
