| Make it so on 16:42 - May 20 with 4012 views | farkenhell |
That would be perfect for us. |  | |  |
| Make it so on 16:46 - May 20 with 3933 views | Illinoisblue |
| Make it so on 16:42 - May 20 by farkenhell |
That would be perfect for us. |
Yep! Would work very well for us. |  |
| |
| Make it so on 16:53 - May 20 with 3819 views | belgablue |
I think this is what the decision should have been. |  |
| |
| Make it so on 16:58 - May 20 with 3757 views | jas0999 |
This would be the correct decision. | | | |
| Make it so on 16:59 - May 20 with 3755 views | LandOfMickyStockwell |
It all depends on how and when Southampton were expelled.
After letting the semi-final complete, to me, it seems Southampton were expelled at the final. Meaning no way back in for either of the losing semi-finalists.
The best way for Boro to have protected their claim was to hold up the leg they felt so disadvantaged in. Instead Boro played it, hoping to win but built a case for Southampton to be expelled if they lost it. Cake and eating it.
So glad we're up! |  | | |
| Make it so on 17:00 - May 20 with 3717 views | MattinLondon |
Much more realistic that the play-offs will be declared null-and-void allowing either WH or Spurs to stay up. [Post edited 20 May 17:01]
|  | | |
| Make it so on 17:03 - May 20 with 3677 views | The_Romford_Blue |
If we’re talking about perfect scenarios… surely Boro beating Hull Saturday and then Hull win their case that they didn’t have time to prepare and both go up. 21 team prem and only 3 go down. That would surely be the best outcome for us. Albeit of course that is almost never going to happen |  |
| |
| Make it so on 17:16 - May 20 with 3545 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
I hope not.
Boro should be in the playoff final. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Make it so on 17:17 - May 20 with 3531 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Make it so on 17:16 - May 20 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I hope not.
Boro should be in the playoff final. |
They had 210 minutes to do that. |  |
| |
| Make it so on 17:18 - May 20 with 3526 views | DanTheMan |
| Make it so on 17:17 - May 20 by GlasgowBlue |
They had 210 minutes to do that. |
I guess the argument is, would they have won if Southampton hadn't of cheated? I don't think so but it's impossible to say, which is the issue. |  |
| |
| Make it so on 17:18 - May 20 with 3520 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
If we are sending Hull straight up, surely we should just cancel the playoffs and give it to Millwall for finishing 3rd?
This could go on for months. |  |
| |
| Make it so on 17:25 - May 20 with 3449 views | pingu67 |
Meanwhile, west ham and spurs are exploring the possibility that only 2 teams go down and 2 up | | | |
| Make it so on 17:27 - May 20 with 3424 views | DarkBrandon |
| Make it so on 17:18 - May 20 by Cheltenham_Blue |
If we are sending Hull straight up, surely we should just cancel the playoffs and give it to Millwall for finishing 3rd?
This could go on for months. |
Someone from Wrexham was saying they should re-run the play-offs in their entirety with Wrexham replacing Southampton!
Next up someone will be along to say the entire season should be annulled. |  | | |
| Make it so on 17:33 - May 20 with 3365 views | gosblue |
Anything other than a Hull win will seem unfair. So for that reason alone I'll be routing for Hull at the weekend. | | | |
| Make it so on 17:33 - May 20 with 3353 views | lowhouseblue |
i do think this isn't going to end with the appeal and it's all heading to court. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Make it so on 17:34 - May 20 with 3357 views | positivity |
| Make it so on 17:27 - May 20 by DarkBrandon |
Someone from Wrexham was saying they should re-run the play-offs in their entirety with Wrexham replacing Southampton!
Next up someone will be along to say the entire season should be annulled. |
that would suit wolves and man city!
if soton are rewarded for their cheating and reinstated, leicester will be saying blackburn should be relegated in their place! "they had 46 games to get more points than us"... | |
| |
| Make it so on 17:34 - May 20 with 3353 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Make it so on 17:18 - May 20 by DanTheMan |
I guess the argument is, would they have won if Southampton hadn't of cheated? I don't think so but it's impossible to say, which is the issue. |
The inept spy was caught very quickly and had Boro managed to put the ball in the back of the net, something which plagued them for the final months of the season, they would have put the game out of Southampton's reach in the first half.
I think Southampton should be punished. I don't think that Boro should be rewarded. [Post edited 20 May 17:37]
| |
| |
| Make it so on 17:36 - May 20 with 3316 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Make it so on 17:17 - May 20 by GlasgowBlue |
They had 210 minutes to do that. |
90 mins of which forms part of the trial.
If Boro are being expelled for cheating against them in a play off fixture, then Boro should be reinstated.
This fixture is what its all about. | |
| |
| Make it so on 17:37 - May 20 with 3310 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Make it so on 17:18 - May 20 by DanTheMan |
I guess the argument is, would they have won if Southampton hadn't of cheated? I don't think so but it's impossible to say, which is the issue. |
THIS. | |
| |
| Make it so on 17:37 - May 20 with 3301 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Make it so on 17:34 - May 20 by GlasgowBlue |
The inept spy was caught very quickly and had Boro managed to put the ball in the back of the net, something which plagued them for the final months of the season, they would have put the game out of Southampton's reach in the first half.
I think Southampton should be punished. I don't think that Boro should be rewarded. [Post edited 20 May 17:37]
|
How long had he been there? What had he seen? | |
| |
| Make it so on 17:38 - May 20 with 3285 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Make it so on 17:34 - May 20 by GlasgowBlue |
The inept spy was caught very quickly and had Boro managed to put the ball in the back of the net, something which plagued them for the final months of the season, they would have put the game out of Southampton's reach in the first half.
I think Southampton should be punished. I don't think that Boro should be rewarded. [Post edited 20 May 17:37]
|
I don't think Hull should be rewarded either. |  |
| |
| Make it so on 17:39 - May 20 with 3267 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Make it so on 17:37 - May 20 by Marshalls_Mullet |
How long had he been there? What had he seen? |
If he was watching Boro's shooting practice, then not a lot. | |
| |
| Make it so on 17:40 - May 20 with 3247 views | E_I_E_I_E_I_O |
| Make it so on 17:16 - May 20 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I hope not.
Boro should be in the playoff final. |
Even Millwall might have a case. It's not there fault they didn't play a team that cheated. So boro have benefit from finishing 5th and playing a team they essentially couldn't lose to yet Millwall had a obsticle in their way to the final even though they finished higher. |  | | |
| Make it so on 17:43 - May 20 with 3180 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Make it so on 17:40 - May 20 by E_I_E_I_E_I_O |
Even Millwall might have a case. It's not there fault they didn't play a team that cheated. So boro have benefit from finishing 5th and playing a team they essentially couldn't lose to yet Millwall had a obsticle in their way to the final even though they finished higher. |
It's lucky in that respect for Boro, but Millwall got knocked out fair and square, they can't have any cause for complaint. | |
| |
| Make it so on 17:48 - May 20 with 3129 views | TheBoyBlue |
Gosh. Imagine being a Hull, Middlesbrough or Southampton fan right now.
Thank goodness we got the job done and avoided it all. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
