Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
DNA 🧬 20:12 - Jul 16 with 2848 viewsPerublue

I think TT’s latest comments are the nail in the coffin for him … the press and the players will be totally against him … it’s a shame as apart from that horrendous 30 minutes he’d done a good job managing the squad and matches I thought.
But his role is untenable now.

Poll: Should Burns or Chaplin now replace the Shefki/Pablo TWTD question of yore ?

1
DNA 🧬 on 20:14 - Jul 16 with 2311 viewsCheltenham_Blue

What's he said?

Poll: If we were to spend £200m would you rather

1
DNA 🧬 on 20:16 - Jul 16 with 2283 viewsSitfcB

Think people just need to chill out.

Pretty sure we got further than a lot expected.

On last night, had we pulled it off he’d have been lauded up as the best manager ever, did he go defensive too early? Maybe.

But had he gone for it and we conceded people would have said why didn’t we shut up shop, couldn’t really win.

The right thing to have done was probably not change it so early and kept playing that way we were.

COYB
Poll: Should we block polls for one day?
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

0
DNA 🧬 on 20:19 - Jul 16 with 2252 viewsPerublue

DNA 🧬 on 20:14 - Jul 16 by Cheltenham_Blue

What's he said?


"In this moment my feeling was no structure in the world could have helped us," Tuchel says, "because actually we were too passive and we were not physical enough, we didn't stop runners arriving in our box and the deliveries were wrong too.
"I haven't seen the data yet, but I think just right after the goal the momentum swings completely and ball possession drops dramatically.
"We couldn't find any duels anymore, that's why we dropped deeper and deeper, it was never the plan, but it happened.
"(We) couldn't stop the runners from second line, the midfielders, through our gaps, and the deliveries were on the highest level. You need to get back on the ball, otherwise you cannot break the pressure and you cannot get the momentum back.
"I think ball possession plays then a crucial role, it's maybe not in our DNA like it is in our Spanish DNA or in our Argentinian-Brazilian DNA, to take the ball and control the game with the ball."

Poll: Should Burns or Chaplin now replace the Shefki/Pablo TWTD question of yore ?

0
DNA 🧬 on 20:19 - Jul 16 with 2244 viewsDarkBrandon

DNA 🧬 on 20:16 - Jul 16 by SitfcB

Think people just need to chill out.

Pretty sure we got further than a lot expected.

On last night, had we pulled it off he’d have been lauded up as the best manager ever, did he go defensive too early? Maybe.

But had he gone for it and we conceded people would have said why didn’t we shut up shop, couldn’t really win.

The right thing to have done was probably not change it so early and kept playing that way we were.


You are right … he couldn’t win
4
DNA 🧬 on 20:20 - Jul 16 with 2239 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

DNA 🧬 on 20:16 - Jul 16 by SitfcB

Think people just need to chill out.

Pretty sure we got further than a lot expected.

On last night, had we pulled it off he’d have been lauded up as the best manager ever, did he go defensive too early? Maybe.

But had he gone for it and we conceded people would have said why didn’t we shut up shop, couldn’t really win.

The right thing to have done was probably not change it so early and kept playing that way we were.


I think we did OK, but we didnt really play anyone of note.

The Mexico match was THE memory from this WC, what a night.

I think thats why the surrender last night was such a disappointment. Its not a case of whether we shut up shop, its not having an out ball at least that was unforgivable.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

1
DNA 🧬 on 20:21 - Jul 16 with 2210 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

DNA 🧬 on 20:19 - Jul 16 by Perublue

"In this moment my feeling was no structure in the world could have helped us," Tuchel says, "because actually we were too passive and we were not physical enough, we didn't stop runners arriving in our box and the deliveries were wrong too.
"I haven't seen the data yet, but I think just right after the goal the momentum swings completely and ball possession drops dramatically.
"We couldn't find any duels anymore, that's why we dropped deeper and deeper, it was never the plan, but it happened.
"(We) couldn't stop the runners from second line, the midfielders, through our gaps, and the deliveries were on the highest level. You need to get back on the ball, otherwise you cannot break the pressure and you cannot get the momentum back.
"I think ball possession plays then a crucial role, it's maybe not in our DNA like it is in our Spanish DNA or in our Argentinian-Brazilian DNA, to take the ball and control the game with the ball."


He sounds lost, like he's just given up.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
DNA 🧬 on 20:22 - Jul 16 with 2183 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

DNA 🧬 on 20:19 - Jul 16 by DarkBrandon

You are right … he couldn’t win


I dont think its that binary, there is a middle ground, with sensible subs (fresh legs in attacking positions) that would have made more sense.

If we had gone out fighting, it would be a lot easier to take.

I will never understand the Gordon substitution.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

2
DNA 🧬 on 20:23 - Jul 16 with 2184 viewsPerublue

DNA 🧬 on 20:16 - Jul 16 by SitfcB

Think people just need to chill out.

Pretty sure we got further than a lot expected.

On last night, had we pulled it off he’d have been lauded up as the best manager ever, did he go defensive too early? Maybe.

But had he gone for it and we conceded people would have said why didn’t we shut up shop, couldn’t really win.

The right thing to have done was probably not change it so early and kept playing that way we were.


I’m in the Tuchel camp … but he and the FA might as well accept the next 2 years leading to a home Euro’s is like Starmer hanging on.

Poll: Should Burns or Chaplin now replace the Shefki/Pablo TWTD question of yore ?

1
Login to get fewer ads

DNA 🧬 on 20:32 - Jul 16 with 2113 viewsLeoMuff

DNA 🧬 on 20:21 - Jul 16 by Marshalls_Mullet

He sounds lost, like he's just given up.


How are Burn, Konza, Stones, O Reilly, Guehi, Spence, going to help us get on the ball ? One midfielder in Anderson. You want to get on the ball you don’t play 6 defenders and one midfielder.

Lost the plot

The only Muff in Town.
Poll: Lamberts rotational policy has left us....

4
DNA 🧬 on 20:34 - Jul 16 with 2086 viewsbilllm

DNA 🧬 on 20:14 - Jul 16 by Cheltenham_Blue

What's he said?


I think the Mexican game and the conditions against Norway and the recovery time done as much damage as anything else,
We did as well as I thought we would,
I think we as supporters have to realize there are many good nations out there now it's difficult, luck plays a big part,
Not sure il see us win a trophy,
But never give up hope,
3
DNA 🧬 on 20:35 - Jul 16 with 2059 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

DNA 🧬 on 20:23 - Jul 16 by Perublue

I’m in the Tuchel camp … but he and the FA might as well accept the next 2 years leading to a home Euro’s is like Starmer hanging on.


I don't want him sacked, but I think he should admit that his tactics were wrong. Even if he uses the caveat of hindsight.

Tuchel made these comments when assessing the Euro finals loss: "They were more afraid to drop out of the tournament than having the hunger and excitement to win it." ....and they have unfortunately come back to haunt him.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

1
DNA 🧬 on 20:37 - Jul 16 with 2011 viewsLeoMuff

DNA 🧬 on 20:35 - Jul 16 by Marshalls_Mullet

I don't want him sacked, but I think he should admit that his tactics were wrong. Even if he uses the caveat of hindsight.

Tuchel made these comments when assessing the Euro finals loss: "They were more afraid to drop out of the tournament than having the hunger and excitement to win it." ....and they have unfortunately come back to haunt him.


Yep, we should keep him he did plenty right this tournement, which makes last night even more baffling

The only Muff in Town.
Poll: Lamberts rotational policy has left us....

0
DNA 🧬 on 20:43 - Jul 16 with 1982 viewsjontysnut

DNA 🧬 on 20:32 - Jul 16 by LeoMuff

How are Burn, Konza, Stones, O Reilly, Guehi, Spence, going to help us get on the ball ? One midfielder in Anderson. You want to get on the ball you don’t play 6 defenders and one midfielder.

Lost the plot


We don't produce 'schemers' any more, or mercurial rugby players for that matter. When's the last time you could call an England player a genius - Gazza maybe?
0
DNA 🧬 on 20:53 - Jul 16 with 1882 viewsPique

DNA 🧬 on 20:43 - Jul 16 by jontysnut

We don't produce 'schemers' any more, or mercurial rugby players for that matter. When's the last time you could call an England player a genius - Gazza maybe?


Paul Scholes, who was just as good as Modric, Pirlo, Xavi and Iniesta. The Barcelona boys used to watch videos of him at La Masia.

So being England, we decided to play him on the left wing to ensure Gerrard and Lampard could play together and compete to see which one could be the bigger headless chicken.

Scholes, understandably fed up, retired from international football at the age of 29.

29.

We really don't help ourselves.
8
DNA 🧬 on 21:30 - Jul 16 with 1726 viewsPerublue

Rugby mentioned in the thread reminds me .. was ā€œswing low ,sweet chariotā€ getting an airing last night during the match ? I’m sure I heard it a couple of times.

Poll: Should Burns or Chaplin now replace the Shefki/Pablo TWTD question of yore ?

0
DNA 🧬 on 21:31 - Jul 16 with 1718 viewsVic

He’s not wrong though is he!

We’re defo getting better, as the last few tournaments have shown. But until recently we’ve revelled in having a very English way of playing the game - which owed more to blood and guts than guile. As someone posted, Paul Scholes retired and 29, and way before then Hoddle and then Matt Le Tissier we’re often seen as a ā€˜luxury’ players. Add Frank Worthington to that list.
Scandalous.

No wonder it’s taking us so long to get that mentality out of our system. We’re getting there, but there’s still some way to do.

Poll: Will you be watching the 3rd/4th place play off game?

2
DNA 🧬 on 21:34 - Jul 16 with 1695 viewsBanksterDebtSlave

DNA 🧬 on 20:19 - Jul 16 by Perublue

"In this moment my feeling was no structure in the world could have helped us," Tuchel says, "because actually we were too passive and we were not physical enough, we didn't stop runners arriving in our box and the deliveries were wrong too.
"I haven't seen the data yet, but I think just right after the goal the momentum swings completely and ball possession drops dramatically.
"We couldn't find any duels anymore, that's why we dropped deeper and deeper, it was never the plan, but it happened.
"(We) couldn't stop the runners from second line, the midfielders, through our gaps, and the deliveries were on the highest level. You need to get back on the ball, otherwise you cannot break the pressure and you cannot get the momentum back.
"I think ball possession plays then a crucial role, it's maybe not in our DNA like it is in our Spanish DNA or in our Argentinian-Brazilian DNA, to take the ball and control the game with the ball."


In other words, "It was the players."

"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Poll: Political leaning/Ashton in/out.

2
DNA 🧬 on 21:42 - Jul 16 with 1646 viewsReusersTown

DNA 🧬 on 20:16 - Jul 16 by SitfcB

Think people just need to chill out.

Pretty sure we got further than a lot expected.

On last night, had we pulled it off he’d have been lauded up as the best manager ever, did he go defensive too early? Maybe.

But had he gone for it and we conceded people would have said why didn’t we shut up shop, couldn’t really win.

The right thing to have done was probably not change it so early and kept playing that way we were.


We got a lot further than a lot expected... * Given the squad he had selected.

There's going defensive & there's having 4/5 CBs on the pitch with 30 minutes to go. That is how a non league team would play it in the FA cup and tbh is pretty embarrassing.
[Post edited 16 Jul 21:44]
4
DNA 🧬 on 21:50 - Jul 16 with 1582 viewsReusersTown

DNA 🧬 on 20:37 - Jul 16 by LeoMuff

Yep, we should keep him he did plenty right this tournement, which makes last night even more baffling


All he did was beat teams we were expected to beat whilst playing fairly poorly with very little patterns or shape.
0
DNA 🧬 on 21:52 - Jul 16 with 1563 viewsvapour_trail

DNA 🧬 on 20:16 - Jul 16 by SitfcB

Think people just need to chill out.

Pretty sure we got further than a lot expected.

On last night, had we pulled it off he’d have been lauded up as the best manager ever, did he go defensive too early? Maybe.

But had he gone for it and we conceded people would have said why didn’t we shut up shop, couldn’t really win.

The right thing to have done was probably not change it so early and kept playing that way we were.


This is shite.

We were one of four seeds the draw was made easier for by FIFA.

We got to the last four. That’s par.

Then we capitulated.

Trailing vapour since 1999.
Poll: Should Gav and Phil limiti the number of polls?

3
DNA 🧬 on 22:01 - Jul 16 with 1502 viewsBlueForYou

DNA 🧬 on 21:30 - Jul 16 by Perublue

Rugby mentioned in the thread reminds me .. was ā€œswing low ,sweet chariotā€ getting an airing last night during the match ? I’m sure I heard it a couple of times.


We just happen to be playing Argentina in Argentina on Saturday. Hopefully our Rugby boys can win & give us something to cheer.
1
DNA 🧬 on 22:01 - Jul 16 with 1501 viewsTrequartista

I think the comments about dna would be fair in general but not in the context of that defeat.

I can't see how he continues. It doesn't seem right to make such a decision on half a game, but it was such a big game and such a big blunder, and I think the relationship with the players is now too strained.
[Post edited 16 Jul 22:02]

Poll: Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

3
DNA 🧬 on 22:04 - Jul 16 with 1469 viewsvapour_trail

DNA 🧬 on 22:01 - Jul 16 by Trequartista

I think the comments about dna would be fair in general but not in the context of that defeat.

I can't see how he continues. It doesn't seem right to make such a decision on half a game, but it was such a big game and such a big blunder, and I think the relationship with the players is now too strained.
[Post edited 16 Jul 22:02]


Completely agree.

Suspect the FA will let this stumble on for some time however.

Trailing vapour since 1999.
Poll: Should Gav and Phil limiti the number of polls?

1
DNA 🧬 on 22:05 - Jul 16 with 1461 viewsIllinoisblue

DNA 🧬 on 21:31 - Jul 16 by Vic

He’s not wrong though is he!

We’re defo getting better, as the last few tournaments have shown. But until recently we’ve revelled in having a very English way of playing the game - which owed more to blood and guts than guile. As someone posted, Paul Scholes retired and 29, and way before then Hoddle and then Matt Le Tissier we’re often seen as a ā€˜luxury’ players. Add Frank Worthington to that list.
Scandalous.

No wonder it’s taking us so long to get that mentality out of our system. We’re getting there, but there’s still some way to do.


The stats make for grim reading:


62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

1
DNA 🧬 on 06:17 - Jul 17 with 1084 viewsBenters

DNA 🧬 on 20:19 - Jul 16 by DarkBrandon

You are right … he couldn’t win


šŸ˜‚

Gentlybentley
Poll: Which is best Cycling or Running,i will go for cycling as you are sitting down

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026