Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament 23:11 - Jul 25 with 42032 views | StokieBlue | Nice to see them all taking it so seriously, after all it was only 42.6C in Paris today. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-49092653 SB [Post edited 25 Jul 2019 23:12]
| |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| | |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:50 - Jul 28 with 1449 views | Ryorry |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:33 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | "Jeezus H - you asked for evidence - I pointed out that it is within this thread " Where? If I can't see it, and you can, show we where it is. Ryorry: There's a massive needle in that haystack what everyone can see apart from you. CIL: where? Ryorry: It's in the haystack. CIL: If you can see it, please show me. Ryorry: Why should I waste my time showing you? Everyone else can see it apart from you! Do you not see the point of me asking? If you accuse me of something, the decent think is to point it out so I have a chance of defending myself, or accepting the fact that you're right and perhaps even learn from it. If you don't point it out, then it's fair for me to think that you've made it up, irrespective of any claim by you or others that you're all in agreement about what I'm accused of. |
You seriously want me to c & p an entire 12 page thread??!! I posted what was meant to be a genuinely helpful suggestion to you for a way out of the hole you dug yourself; your response is to try & smear me & dig your sharpened spade down even harder. Talk about evidence for Stokie's comment about you being nasty - I didn't upvote him because I dislike endorsing such comments about others, but must say I'm sorely tempted now ... | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:51 - Jul 28 with 1447 views | Ryorry |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:42 - Jul 28 by J2BLUE | Username? |
HurleyBurley | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:51 - Jul 28 with 1446 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:33 - Jul 28 by J2BLUE | Agree.I don't think CIL is the type to have a secret second account. Although maybe I would say that... |
On the one hand it seems I have this perverse desire to be different to everyone else, but then I have a second account who supports me. I don't get that. That said, perhaps I should set up a second account to dislike my opinions more than anyone else. Wow, that would be really cool, I'd get a net surplus of positive votes on threads like this, because that's what it's all about, right? Popular opinion is right, always. Right? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:51 - Jul 28 with 1446 views | footers |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:44 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | I stopped reading after your first line. You'll understand why. What's the point of the whole global warming / climate change argument/debate if there's danger to us. Put it like this: I know that if I enter an empty sealed room that is below my body temperature, say 20 degrees C, my sheer presence is going to warm it up, whether I start a fire or not. Let's call this "room warming", or even "room temperature change" if you like. I accept it. But whether I accept it or not, what relevance does it have if it has no danger to me or the room I'm in? |
So, hang on, just to summarise briefly... You're basically saying that humankind does create global warming but essentially it's fine because it's not causing any harm. That it in a nutshell? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:53 - Jul 28 with 1438 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:50 - Jul 28 by Ryorry | You seriously want me to c & p an entire 12 page thread??!! I posted what was meant to be a genuinely helpful suggestion to you for a way out of the hole you dug yourself; your response is to try & smear me & dig your sharpened spade down even harder. Talk about evidence for Stokie's comment about you being nasty - I didn't upvote him because I dislike endorsing such comments about others, but must say I'm sorely tempted now ... |
"You seriously want me to c & p an entire 12 page thread??!! · No, post one example to support your accusation. | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:54 - Jul 28 with 1429 views | J2BLUE |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:35 - Jul 28 by footers | Ah, so you're admitting to being BobbyDazzler now, eh? Anyhoo, how's this all going? Anyone won yet? |
My alternative username is known by every. The hilariously brilliant Gitileaks. Interesting you keep pushing that BD thing though...trying to hide something? Do you have less usernames than Spruce and wjk? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:55 - Jul 28 with 1424 views | J2BLUE |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:51 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | On the one hand it seems I have this perverse desire to be different to everyone else, but then I have a second account who supports me. I don't get that. That said, perhaps I should set up a second account to dislike my opinions more than anyone else. Wow, that would be really cool, I'd get a net surplus of positive votes on threads like this, because that's what it's all about, right? Popular opinion is right, always. Right? |
I'll have to check with everyone else and get back to you. | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament (n/t) on 15:55 - Jul 28 with 1423 views | J2BLUE |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:51 - Jul 28 by Ryorry | HurleyBurley |
Thanks. I'm far from convinced though to be honest. [Post edited 28 Jul 2019 15:57]
| |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:56 - Jul 28 with 1420 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:51 - Jul 28 by Ryorry | HurleyBurley |
That's right, HurleyBurley, Seablu and Bogblue. EDIT: And plenty of others who I "hold hands with" from the past who held similar views to me, but seem to have disappeared now. I need them all to prove I'm an attention seeking individual you thrives on being different. [Post edited 28 Jul 2019 15:59]
| |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:59 - Jul 28 with 1406 views | footers |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:54 - Jul 28 by J2BLUE | My alternative username is known by every. The hilariously brilliant Gitileaks. Interesting you keep pushing that BD thing though...trying to hide something? Do you have less usernames than Spruce and wjk? |
Fewer, not less. But I only have one hilarious alt that isn't at all obvious to anyone. How people could work it out is beyond my gift. | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:00 - Jul 28 with 1400 views | gordon |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:44 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | I stopped reading after your first line. You'll understand why. What's the point of the whole global warming / climate change argument/debate if there's danger to us. Put it like this: I know that if I enter an empty sealed room that is below my body temperature, say 20 degrees C, my sheer presence is going to warm it up, whether I start a fire or not. Let's call this "room warming", or even "room temperature change" if you like. I accept it. But whether I accept it or not, what relevance does it have if it has no danger to me or the room I'm in? |
Trying my best, but I genuinely don't follow what you're trying to say here. | | | |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:00 - Jul 28 with 1401 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:46 - Jul 28 by Darth_Koont | You attacked the messenger, it's there in black and white, and now you're desperately squirming on the hook. Lovely to watch. |
I said she was a victim of child abuse. How is that attacking her? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:02 - Jul 28 with 1392 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:00 - Jul 28 by gordon | Trying my best, but I genuinely don't follow what you're trying to say here. |
What's the point of scientists accepting anthropologic global warming as a fact if it's not a danger? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:06 - Jul 28 with 1375 views | Darth_Koont |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:00 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | I said she was a victim of child abuse. How is that attacking her? |
| |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:06 - Jul 28 with 1375 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:59 - Jul 28 by footers | Fewer, not less. But I only have one hilarious alt that isn't at all obvious to anyone. How people could work it out is beyond my gift. |
The most hilarious posters on here are StokieBlue, DarthKoont, Ryorry, SpruceMoose, Herbivore and Caught-in-limbo. Is it one of them? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:07 - Jul 28 with 1366 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:06 - Jul 28 by Darth_Koont | |
LOL | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:09 - Jul 28 with 1358 views | Ryorry |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:53 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | "You seriously want me to c & p an entire 12 page thread??!! · No, post one example to support your accusation. |
You're so disingenuous it beggars belief. Stokie said 11:19 - Jul 28 by StokieBlue "That's rather a lot of assumptions there and it's quite a stereotypical assessment. If you substituted the words Anglo Saxon for African I suspect it would come over rather racist as well. I don't think you're doing yourself any favours. SB" To which you replied "So no specific example to present? Well, that's hardly a surprise. There appears to be a pattern forming here." To which I replied (to you) "[Post edited 28 Jul 11:19]"Look, just a suggestion and feel free to ignore it of course, but you backed yourself into a corner early doors & have been trying unsuccessfully, with increasing desperation, to wriggle out of ever since, actually reducing your credibility in the process as several others have posted very solid stuff puncturing your balloon. You'd be given more respect & taken more seriously if for once you just stuck your hand up & admitted you got it wrong. " To which you replied (to me) "I have no idea what you're talking about. Please cite evidence, otherwise it just looks like unsubstantiated accusations. I'm sure you don't want to do that. [Post edited 28 Jul 12:43] To which I replied "Lol, read the thread CIL - you're just backing me up with that post!" To which you replied (to me) "You always do this. You throw accusations around without backing them up. When asked to do so, you can't back yourself and say, "just read through the thread". It's lame. You're just a mud slinger. I support my convictions and opinions with sourced material or let people know it is my own opinion. You don't. Such behaviour appeals to people who are ideologically opposed to me. There's nothing healthy or positive about your MO." //////////////////////// So I've actually no idea whatsoever of what "evidence" it is you're actually wanting, nor what "accusations" you are accusing me of making. All you've done is stir, deliberately confuse, & play smoke & mirrors. Really don't see why I should waste any more of my Sunday on you; you're shrewd enough to have worked out that time-wasting is my pet hate & I'm sure you're doing it deliberately. Enjoy the rest of your day. [Post edited 28 Jul 2019 16:19]
| |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:13 - Jul 28 with 1349 views | gordon |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:02 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | What's the point of scientists accepting anthropologic global warming as a fact if it's not a danger? |
Well, if that's what you understood from my post it's not too difficult to see how you get in such a pickle! I certainly didn't say that climate isn't a danger - what I said was that the role of climate science is often to inform many other fields of research. | | | |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:16 - Jul 28 with 1341 views | jeera |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 15:59 - Jul 28 by footers | Fewer, not less. But I only have one hilarious alt that isn't at all obvious to anyone. How people could work it out is beyond my gift. |
That knickers one? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:19 - Jul 28 with 1331 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:09 - Jul 28 by Ryorry | You're so disingenuous it beggars belief. Stokie said 11:19 - Jul 28 by StokieBlue "That's rather a lot of assumptions there and it's quite a stereotypical assessment. If you substituted the words Anglo Saxon for African I suspect it would come over rather racist as well. I don't think you're doing yourself any favours. SB" To which you replied "So no specific example to present? Well, that's hardly a surprise. There appears to be a pattern forming here." To which I replied (to you) "[Post edited 28 Jul 11:19]"Look, just a suggestion and feel free to ignore it of course, but you backed yourself into a corner early doors & have been trying unsuccessfully, with increasing desperation, to wriggle out of ever since, actually reducing your credibility in the process as several others have posted very solid stuff puncturing your balloon. You'd be given more respect & taken more seriously if for once you just stuck your hand up & admitted you got it wrong. " To which you replied (to me) "I have no idea what you're talking about. Please cite evidence, otherwise it just looks like unsubstantiated accusations. I'm sure you don't want to do that. [Post edited 28 Jul 12:43] To which I replied "Lol, read the thread CIL - you're just backing me up with that post!" To which you replied (to me) "You always do this. You throw accusations around without backing them up. When asked to do so, you can't back yourself and say, "just read through the thread". It's lame. You're just a mud slinger. I support my convictions and opinions with sourced material or let people know it is my own opinion. You don't. Such behaviour appeals to people who are ideologically opposed to me. There's nothing healthy or positive about your MO." //////////////////////// So I've actually no idea whatsoever of what "evidence" it is you're actually wanting, nor what "accusations" you are accusing me of making. All you've done is stir, deliberately confuse, & play smoke & mirrors. Really don't see why I should waste any more of my Sunday on you; you're shrewd enough to have worked out that time-wasting is my pet hate & I'm sure you're doing it deliberately. Enjoy the rest of your day. [Post edited 28 Jul 2019 16:19]
|
Then perhaps you can tell me how the thread that Stokie was referring to was racist an d contained assumptions? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament (n/t) on 16:19 - Jul 28 with 1329 views | Ryorry |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:19 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | Then perhaps you can tell me how the thread that Stokie was referring to was racist an d contained assumptions? |
| |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:24 - Jul 28 with 1316 views | Ryorry |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:19 - Jul 28 by caught-in-limbo | Then perhaps you can tell me how the thread that Stokie was referring to was racist an d contained assumptions? |
(Browser jumped & fired a blank for previous post.) I have no idea, as I've never replied to or voted for that comment of Stokie's - I didn't get involved with it at all. I read it & could sort of see where he was coming from, but while I was doing the washing up away from site, pondered the issue & thought it was fair enough to place people & their views within the context of their culture - both nature and nurture etc. | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:31 - Jul 28 with 1303 views | caught-in-limbo |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:24 - Jul 28 by Ryorry | (Browser jumped & fired a blank for previous post.) I have no idea, as I've never replied to or voted for that comment of Stokie's - I didn't get involved with it at all. I read it & could sort of see where he was coming from, but while I was doing the washing up away from site, pondered the issue & thought it was fair enough to place people & their views within the context of their culture - both nature and nurture etc. |
But Stokie's comment and my response to it formed the starting point of your answer to another question. You didn't get involved with Stokie's comment but you have used it in your answer to be as evidence of something. What? | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:33 - Jul 28 with 1297 views | footers |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:16 - Jul 28 by jeera | That knickers one? |
I'd love to see more knickers, bud! But if you mean kinnockers, then no. Whoever they are has made an account just to ape me. It's quite concerning. | |
| |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:33 - Jul 28 with 1294 views | J2BLUE |
Pathetic stuff from some members of the French parliament on 16:33 - Jul 28 by footers | I'd love to see more knickers, bud! But if you mean kinnockers, then no. Whoever they are has made an account just to ape me. It's quite concerning. |
Yea it's a real mystery | |
| |
| |