| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed 16:46 - Nov 5 with 3239 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
I give you exhibit B;
|  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |  |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:49 - Nov 5 with 2295 views | SpruceMoose |
I'd be interested to see Exhibit C, D and E with the next few frames though. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:49 - Nov 5 with 2289 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Yeah doesn't look great from that angle, not two footed, but not sure anyone thought it was.
The angle from i-follow didn't show anything really! |  |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:51 - Nov 5 with 2281 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:49 - Nov 5 by Wallingford_Boy |
Yeah doesn't look great from that angle, not two footed, but not sure anyone thought it was.
The angle from i-follow didn't show anything really! |
There were a couple of posters on here. I'm naming no names.
EDIT: Also, this angle shows exactly what I thought (and posted) that ifollow showed. [Post edited 5 Nov 2020 16:54]
| |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:52 - Nov 5 with 2266 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:49 - Nov 5 by SpruceMoose |
I'd be interested to see Exhibit C, D and E with the next few frames though. |
Not sure it matters does it? He's clearly attempting the tackle with his left foot while his right is on the grass, slipping. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:54 - Nov 5 with 2253 views | SpruceMoose |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:52 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Not sure it matters does it? He's clearly attempting the tackle with his left foot while his right is on the grass, slipping. |
I reckon Bully would say we need to see them. Who knows what his other foot did next. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:55 - Nov 5 with 2247 views | footers |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:51 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
There were a couple of posters on here. I'm naming no names.
EDIT: Also, this angle shows exactly what I thought (and posted) that ifollow showed. [Post edited 5 Nov 2020 16:54]
|
But good job of letting the argument lie. |  |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:55 - Nov 5 with 2239 views | pointofblue |
As the tweeter says, Dozzell being over the ball does not look good. |  |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:56 - Nov 5 with 2232 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:54 - Nov 5 by SpruceMoose |
I reckon Bully would say we need to see them. Who knows what his other foot did next. |
Surely a two-footed challenge needs both going in at the same time? If his right follows in (because he's slipping) that surely doesn't make it a two-footed challenge? | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:59 - Nov 5 with 2216 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:55 - Nov 5 by footers |
But good job of letting the argument lie. |
I said I'd agree to disagree and leave it there with a particular poster, I never agreed to letting the argument lie in general!
I'm just a purveyor of truth, Footster. Andre is innocent! [Post edited 5 Nov 2020 17:07]
| |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:00 - Nov 5 with 2208 views | SpruceMoose |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:56 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Surely a two-footed challenge needs both going in at the same time? If his right follows in (because he's slipping) that surely doesn't make it a two-footed challenge? |
I don't see why it would require that. One foot goes first, then the other could join it prior to impact. [Post edited 5 Nov 2020 17:00]
| |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:02 - Nov 5 with 2202 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:55 - Nov 5 by pointofblue |
As the tweeter says, Dozzell being over the ball does not look good. |
No, agreed. Whether that makes it a straight red or not is another matter.
Not my argument though. I just had a ding-dong with a couple of people saying he went in two-footed, so good to see this picture vindicates me on that score at least. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:06 - Nov 5 with 2187 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:00 - Nov 5 by SpruceMoose |
I don't see why it would require that. One foot goes first, then the other could join it prior to impact. [Post edited 5 Nov 2020 17:00]
|
We may have different definitions of what a two-footed challenge is then, but regardless, the left foot is clearly making impact way before the right (if it ever did).
If I kick you in the shin with my left foot and then shortly afterwards my right, it's not nice but it's not a two-footed challenge. Not as I understand them anyway. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| You drunk? (n/t) on 17:08 - Nov 5 with 2177 views | Bloots |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:55 - Nov 5 by footers |
But good job of letting the argument lie. |
|  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:08 - Nov 5 with 2175 views | SpruceMoose |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:06 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
We may have different definitions of what a two-footed challenge is then, but regardless, the left foot is clearly making impact way before the right (if it ever did).
If I kick you in the shin with my left foot and then shortly afterwards my right, it's not nice but it's not a two-footed challenge. Not as I understand them anyway. |
Wait until I get you with a four footed tackle. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:08 - Nov 5 with 2174 views | Dubtractor |
It does look like a shin high lunge, regardless of the number of feet involved.
It was a harsh red, but was never getting overturned in a million years. |  |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:09 - Nov 5 with 2173 views | homer_123 |
No but, as I said on the night, the only reason I can think of for the Ref to give it was that Dozzell wasn't in control...which this, sadly, kinda indicates. |  |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:10 - Nov 5 with 2160 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:08 - Nov 5 by SpruceMoose |
Wait until I get you with a four footed tackle. |
A four hooved tackle you mean? | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:11 - Nov 5 with 2150 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:08 - Nov 5 by Dubtractor |
It does look like a shin high lunge, regardless of the number of feet involved.
It was a harsh red, but was never getting overturned in a million years. |
Agreed. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:14 - Nov 5 with 2142 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:09 - Nov 5 by homer_123 |
No but, as I said on the night, the only reason I can think of for the Ref to give it was that Dozzell wasn't in control...which this, sadly, kinda indicates. |
Depends if he makes contact with the ball first? Not sure this photo tells us one way or the other. All it tells us is he didn't dive in two-footed, which would've been a (deserved) red. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:25 - Nov 5 with 2112 views | EastTownBlue |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:14 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Depends if he makes contact with the ball first? Not sure this photo tells us one way or the other. All it tells us is he didn't dive in two-footed, which would've been a (deserved) red. |
Winning the ball first is irrelevant when it comes to "serious foul play". | | | |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:28 - Nov 5 with 2101 views | Darth_Koont |
It was a foul and could easily have been a yellow despite going for the ball.
The mitigating factor for me seemed to be the other Sunderland player behind who looked to have pulled Andre back and off balance as he was stretching for the ball and well ahead of Leadbitter.
I can se why the red card can’t be overturned but In the context of the game and what led up to the challenge, it was still a very poor decision by the ref. |  |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:29 - Nov 5 with 2093 views | Ftnfwest |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:49 - Nov 5 by SpruceMoose |
I'd be interested to see Exhibit C, D and E with the next few frames though. |
It’s the ones before I’d like to see when he gets pushed but if contact anywhere is a foul, it was a foregone conclusion really |  | | |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:48 - Nov 5 with 2014 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:28 - Nov 5 by Darth_Koont |
It was a foul and could easily have been a yellow despite going for the ball.
The mitigating factor for me seemed to be the other Sunderland player behind who looked to have pulled Andre back and off balance as he was stretching for the ball and well ahead of Leadbitter.
I can se why the red card can’t be overturned but In the context of the game and what led up to the challenge, it was still a very poor decision by the ref. |
Yep, absolutely. Also, as Joe and others said, he let plenty bad challenges go completely unpunished up to that point. It was like the ref had finally had enough and blamed everything on Andre! | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:52 - Nov 5 with 1997 views | Herbivore |
"Why on earth would you go with a still rather than actual footage that tells the whole story?" - Dollers, one day ago.
You've not changed a jot, Dollers. |  |
| |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 17:54 - Nov 5 with 1987 views | longtimefan |
| Anyone still thinking Dozzell's challenge was two-footed on 16:56 - Nov 5 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Surely a two-footed challenge needs both going in at the same time? If his right follows in (because he's slipping) that surely doesn't make it a two-footed challenge? |
It doesn’t need to be two footed to be classed as dangerous, and red as a consequence. A single footed challenge at that height could still classed as such. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
