For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth 13:29 - Jul 3 with 10540 views | Illinoisblue | |  |
| |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:33 - Jul 3 with 6638 views | NthQldITFC | Willie come? |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:37 - Jul 3 with 6553 views | SheffordBlue | I know a lot of people would like Cooper (and an equal number it seems wouldn't) but I don't think we've actually been linked with him by anyone in the mainstream media have - just forum links? |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:39 - Jul 3 with 6517 views | PhilTWTD | Definitely something in Rushworth interest but got the impression it had cooled a little or at least wasn't as strong as had been claimed when it was reported last week. |  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:41 - Jul 3 with 6403 views | FrimleyBlue |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:39 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | Definitely something in Rushworth interest but got the impression it had cooled a little or at least wasn't as strong as had been claimed when it was reported last week. |
what about pope? anything there? or how about de gea |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:42 - Jul 3 with 6382 views | _clive_baker_ |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:41 - Jul 3 by FrimleyBlue | what about pope? anything there? or how about de gea |
Just waiting to confirm the Juan Mata deal I think. |  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:43 - Jul 3 with 6381 views | PhilTWTD |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:41 - Jul 3 by FrimleyBlue | what about pope? anything there? or how about de gea |
Any interest in Pope was played down when I asked about him. Not asked about De Gea! |  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:43 - Jul 3 with 6371 views | MidlandBlue25 |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:41 - Jul 3 by FrimleyBlue | what about pope? anything there? or how about de gea |
Doubt we'll want Pope as he isn't good with his feet [Post edited 3 Jul 2024 13:43]
|  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:57 - Jul 3 with 6044 views | Markp68 |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:43 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | Any interest in Pope was played down when I asked about him. Not asked about De Gea! |
So any idea who we are genuinely looking at Phil. Kaminsky? |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:12 - Jul 3 with 5832 views | Superblue95 |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:43 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | Any interest in Pope was played down when I asked about him. Not asked about De Gea! |
Heard if we have any interest in Kelleher, Phil? Looks like he’s certain to finally leave Liverpool but read something this morning that Liverpool want 25m so presumably out of our price range if near that level? |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:43 - Jul 3 with 5636 views | hoppy |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:43 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | Any interest in Pope was played down when I asked about him. Not asked about De Gea! |
So not a case of no smoke without fire in regards Pope then? |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:45 - Jul 3 with 5598 views | PhilTWTD |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 13:57 - Jul 3 by Markp68 | So any idea who we are genuinely looking at Phil. Kaminsky? |
Didn't think that was a bad shout when I saw it but not had anything either way on it. |  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:46 - Jul 3 with 5565 views | Keno |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:43 - Jul 3 by hoppy | So not a case of no smoke without fire in regards Pope then? |
I guess it mitre happen |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:46 - Jul 3 with 5561 views | PhilTWTD |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:12 - Jul 3 by Superblue95 | Heard if we have any interest in Kelleher, Phil? Looks like he’s certain to finally leave Liverpool but read something this morning that Liverpool want 25m so presumably out of our price range if near that level? |
Will know Rene Gilmartin well from Liverpool, but there is only so much money to spend, about £70m-ish has been what's suggested to me, and a keeper for that much seems unlikely. |  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:51 - Jul 3 with 5448 views | ITFCBlues |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:46 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | Will know Rene Gilmartin well from Liverpool, but there is only so much money to spend, about £70m-ish has been what's suggested to me, and a keeper for that much seems unlikely. |
If there's only 70m and we sign Hutch and then the Hull duo, how the hell do we make the rest stretch? |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:51 - Jul 3 with 5437 views | hoppy |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:46 - Jul 3 by Keno | I guess it mitre happen |
I asked a Geordie mate if Pope can play out from the back, and he said Vatican. |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:54 - Jul 3 with 5361 views | PhilTWTD |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:51 - Jul 3 by ITFCBlues | If there's only 70m and we sign Hutch and then the Hull duo, how the hell do we make the rest stretch? |
There'll be more frees probably, a couple of £5m/£10m-ish deals, loans. Wonder whether we're already realising well have to revise that up though, as I think fees have been higher than we initially envisaged. |  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:55 - Jul 3 with 5335 views | FrimleyBlue |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:51 - Jul 3 by ITFCBlues | If there's only 70m and we sign Hutch and then the Hull duo, how the hell do we make the rest stretch? |
Hutch only cost £4 in this seasons accounts. So another 66 mill to split across 8 more players. That's how it works right? [Post edited 3 Jul 2024 14:56]
|  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:00 - Jul 3 with 5208 views | ITFCBlues |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:54 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | There'll be more frees probably, a couple of £5m/£10m-ish deals, loans. Wonder whether we're already realising well have to revise that up though, as I think fees have been higher than we initially envisaged. |
Some have suggested 90m figure as well. But you'd think a striker would cost 20m and then a CM could cost 10-15m. Not to mention a new keeper. Still probably need another 8-10 players in reality. |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:01 - Jul 3 with 5176 views | PhilTWTD |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:00 - Jul 3 by ITFCBlues | Some have suggested 90m figure as well. But you'd think a striker would cost 20m and then a CM could cost 10-15m. Not to mention a new keeper. Still probably need another 8-10 players in reality. |
I'm not sure we'd got for that many, to be honest. I reckon seven or eight signings overall. |  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:02 - Jul 3 with 5120 views | ITFCBlues |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:01 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | I'm not sure we'd got for that many, to be honest. I reckon seven or eight signings overall. |
Really? So maybe another 6? Id have thought a total of 10 minimum when you consider those that have already gone and a few others that may well still leave as well |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:06 - Jul 3 with 5031 views | PhilTWTD |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:02 - Jul 3 by ITFCBlues | Really? So maybe another 6? Id have thought a total of 10 minimum when you consider those that have already gone and a few others that may well still leave as well |
Not lost that many that were actually involved, have we? I suspect they didn't expect Hladky to go so that will probably add one to the number, then there are others that could move on, such as Walton, and we'd want to replace them. Maybe more than I'm suggesting, but at the same time they won't want to change the dynamic of the squad by giving what will feel like a major overhaul. It'll be a difficult balance, I think. |  | |  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:09 - Jul 3 with 4959 views | ITFCBlues |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:01 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | I'm not sure we'd got for that many, to be honest. I reckon seven or eight signings overall. |
GK x2 CB LB CM ST x2 LW Plus the two we've signed already. That's already 10 & wouldn't be surprised to see 1 or 2 leave that'd also need replacing. |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:11 - Jul 3 with 4904 views | ITFCBlues |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:06 - Jul 3 by PhilTWTD | Not lost that many that were actually involved, have we? I suspect they didn't expect Hladky to go so that will probably add one to the number, then there are others that could move on, such as Walton, and we'd want to replace them. Maybe more than I'm suggesting, but at the same time they won't want to change the dynamic of the squad by giving what will feel like a major overhaul. It'll be a difficult balance, I think. |
Quite a few bit part/squad players have gone. I just don't see how there's anyway we're not going to be running with a smaller squad than last season as things stand. |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:11 - Jul 3 with 4900 views | Keno |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 14:51 - Jul 3 by hoppy | I asked a Geordie mate if Pope can play out from the back, and he said Vatican. |
just as long we arent expected to kiss his ring |  |
|  |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:12 - Jul 3 with 4869 views | PhilTWTD |
For what it’s worth, Nixon confirming we’re after Rushworth on 15:09 - Jul 3 by ITFCBlues | GK x2 CB LB CM ST x2 LW Plus the two we've signed already. That's already 10 & wouldn't be surprised to see 1 or 2 leave that'd also need replacing. |
Indeed, very easy to get to 10 when you lay out the positions like that. I was thinking in terms of wanting more evolution than revolution which 10 or 11 signings feels more like. Definitely think we need people in all those positions, though. |  | |  |
| |