| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? 17:44 - Nov 4 with 3795 views | Asa |
Completely unacceptable to go into the Premier League not knowing the rules!
It's been confirmed by both Mike Riley and now Dermot Gallagher that the Chaplin incident was just a 'coming together'.
Which explains a lot. We didn't get a penalty at Man City because Davis and Savinho was a coming together. Likewise the Jack Clarke penalty was overturned due to a coming together. So it's all totally justified. Them the rules.
Fancy going into the division and not knowing that one player smashing into another was totally within the rules regardless of how close you got to the ball or whether an attempt was made.
We stupidly keep tripping people, putting up high studs and dragging people down when we should just be colliding with people and therefore nothing would be given! It's our own naive fault.
I am of course joking. Absolutely stunned listening to Dermot Gallagher suggest earlier the players came together when Chaplin was shifting to his left to shoot and trying to escape the 10t truck that mowed him down in the area.
I know the refs stick together but wow. Just wow. I am with Steven Warnock and Sue Smith here. Gallagher dug himself such a ridiculous hole he has effectively suggested that 90% of all fouls given should actually not be awarded.
What the hell is the bar then for a foul being given for playing the man not the ball?
I am not surprised by much the refs, Premier League or VAR come out with but that was utterly remarkable. [Post edited 4 Nov 2024 17:45]
|  | | |  |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 17:48 - Nov 4 with 3696 views | reusersfreekicks |
Gallagher responded like a one track moron.
No analysis or integrity whatsoever |  | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 17:50 - Nov 4 with 3679 views | NthQldITFC |
All this time I've been trying to be considerate and do coming together, and thanks to the PGMOL (or whatever they call themselves for legal purposes) I find that whole ethos is coming apart in my hands. W@nkers! |  |
| |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:05 - Nov 4 with 3545 views | LankHenners |
Did you start a new thread on this because you didn't think you'd get as many upvotes posting it on the 3rd page of the already existing thread which covers all of these points already? |  |
| |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:08 - Nov 4 with 3520 views | Asa |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:05 - Nov 4 by LankHenners |
Did you start a new thread on this because you didn't think you'd get as many upvotes posting it on the 3rd page of the already existing thread which covers all of these points already? |
No.
I've been working all day, decided to post something and didn't first run through every single forum post and response to see if this had already been covered.
Will make sure I spend several hours doing so next time before daring to post what's on my mind ;) | | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:17 - Nov 4 with 3424 views | Leaky |
A mate of my son play rugby for Northampton said if that tackle was in Rugby the Liecester player would have been sin binned for a high tackle |  | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:24 - Nov 4 with 3350 views | ArnieM |
Bollox, it's was a foul, and a stonewall penalty. |  |
| |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:41 - Nov 4 with 3222 views | Guthrum |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:17 - Nov 4 by Leaky |
A mate of my son play rugby for Northampton said if that tackle was in Rugby the Liecester player would have been sin binned for a high tackle |
And not trying to wrap his arms around. |  |
| |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 19:03 - Nov 4 with 3053 views | Esseeja |
Last week at Brentford, Muric literally pushed a player over and they completly ignored it.
We can only presume that you are allowed to do that inside the box if Chaplin doesn't get a clear penalty when it's not just a goalkeeper pushing a player over, because what is a penalty if it doesn't involve the use of legs? | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 19:25 - Nov 4 with 2914 views | Eireannach_gorm |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 17:48 - Nov 4 by reusersfreekicks |
Gallagher responded like a one track moron.
No analysis or integrity whatsoever |
"...... Do you think thats a pen?"
"no, I don't"
"............ ( mouth open ) ....................................."
 |  | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 19:47 - Nov 4 with 2697 views | Rocky |
Not just a foul, Chappers was assaulted. |  | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 19:58 - Nov 4 with 2596 views | Woolfenthen |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 19:25 - Nov 4 by Eireannach_gorm |
"...... Do you think thats a pen?"
"no, I don't"
"............ ( mouth open ) ....................................."
|
big respect to Stephen Warnock he explained the situation so clearly and obviously that only a moron could disagree with, fact he also despises Paul Lambert makes him a fully qualified expert in my view! |  | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 20:00 - Nov 4 with 2558 views | Swansea_Blue |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:41 - Nov 4 by Guthrum |
And not trying to wrap his arms around. |
I’m not sure if a reacharound would have been appropriate for a family audience  |  |
| |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 20:03 - Nov 4 with 2531 views | Churchman |
The Premier League protect their clubs. Interlopers: keep out.
If Riley, Gallagher and co, who of course protect their own, are telling me that one of our players charging into a Man City, Chelsea or Liverpool player at their grounds would not have resulted in a penalty, a booking possibly more and expect me to believe that, they must think the paying public are total mugs.
Chaplin moved the ball to the left to pass or shoot and was wiped out. It really wasn’t a tough decision. Stop treating the paying public as idiots hasbeen refs. [Post edited 4 Nov 2024 20:17]
|  | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 21:40 - Nov 4 with 2252 views | RobTheMonk |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 19:58 - Nov 4 by Woolfenthen |
big respect to Stephen Warnock he explained the situation so clearly and obviously that only a moron could disagree with, fact he also despises Paul Lambert makes him a fully qualified expert in my view! |
That's also two ex players, different genders, different levels played (respectively) plus the presenter as a neutral, all utterly bewildered why it wasn't given. Even Lineker on MOTD knew they'd got away with one.
Then you look at some of the other VAR checks that have and have not been looked at as outlined by Ashton's comments.
The club and us as fans are understandably getting royally pissed off. [Post edited 5 Nov 2024 7:03]
|  | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 04:02 - Nov 5 with 1841 views | tcblue |
Foolishly, years ago I thought the professionalisation of referees would make them be more accountable - at least in terms of criticism.
It is bonkers the amount of protection they have, and how they circle the wagons and have a weird omerta. Normalise being able to say you (or they) got something wrong.
VAR is problematic here, too. If it isn't there to challenge poor on field decisions then what is it for? And why does it need to be operated by serving referees, if that's not what it's for? | | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 08:01 - Nov 5 with 1529 views | Stewart27 |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 19:58 - Nov 4 by Woolfenthen |
big respect to Stephen Warnock he explained the situation so clearly and obviously that only a moron could disagree with, fact he also despises Paul Lambert makes him a fully qualified expert in my view! |
It’s like Attwell was in punchable face Gallagher’s ear piece saying “keep going, keep going”. Gallagher didn’t believe what he was saying. It was cringe worthy seeing himself try and dig his way out of the massive lie he told on tv to protect his union. | | | |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 08:20 - Nov 5 with 1477 views | IPS_wich |
| So who at the club is responsible for this massive oversight then? on 18:05 - Nov 4 by LankHenners |
Did you start a new thread on this because you didn't think you'd get as many upvotes posting it on the 3rd page of the already existing thread which covers all of these points already? |
It worked though - currently on 15 upvotes and I'm going to pop back up to the top of the thread and make it 16... | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
