| Cunha charged 10:32 - Dec 17 with 6324 views | SitfcB |
|  |
| |  |
| Cunha charged on 10:35 - Dec 17 with 4914 views | Portman_Pie |
Hope to see him serve at least a 3 game ban. |  | | |
| Cunha charged on 10:42 - Dec 17 with 4801 views | SitfcB |
| Cunha charged on 10:35 - Dec 17 by Portman_Pie |
Hope to see him serve at least a 3 game ban. |
I expect it’ll be more than that. | |
| |
| Cunha charged on 10:43 - Dec 17 with 4758 views | Steve_M |
| Cunha charged on 10:42 - Dec 17 by SitfcB |
I expect it’ll be more than that. |
Can they delay it until after they play Leicester though? |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 10:45 - Dec 17 with 4712 views | Mookamoo |
| Cunha charged on 10:35 - Dec 17 by Portman_Pie |
Hope to see him serve at least a 3 game ban. |
5 games at the very least I would have thought |  | | |
| Cunha charged on 10:53 - Dec 17 with 4561 views | EJP |
| Cunha charged on 10:42 - Dec 17 by SitfcB |
I expect it’ll be more than that. |
Fully expect him to plead innocence ... |  | | |
| Cunha charged on 11:08 - Dec 17 with 4407 views | Ryorry |
Should blinkin well think so too.
Hope he appeals it, which I think would mean his hearing wouldn't be till after they play the foxes on Sun? He might get another card in that game as well :) |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 11:12 - Dec 17 with 4331 views | Samuelowen88 |
| Cunha charged on 11:08 - Dec 17 by Ryorry |
Should blinkin well think so too.
Hope he appeals it, which I think would mean his hearing wouldn't be till after they play the foxes on Sun? He might get another card in that game as well :) |
Dont you also get a longer ban for appealing |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 11:15 - Dec 17 with 4282 views | Ryorry |
| Cunha charged on 11:12 - Dec 17 by Samuelowen88 |
Dont you also get a longer ban for appealing |
Did think so, but not sure. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Cunha charged on 11:24 - Dec 17 with 4147 views | Trequartista |
Does misconduct cover violent conduct (elbow to back of head) or has that been ignored for spectacle-related tomfoolery? |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 12:08 - Dec 17 with 3895 views | patrickswell |
Watching the Town in 5 footage yesterday, I found myself thinking that at least one of our media team must have captured that incident at relatively close quarters. |  | | |
| Cunha charged on 12:13 - Dec 17 with 3843 views | BasingstokeBlue |
| Cunha charged on 11:12 - Dec 17 by Samuelowen88 |
Dont you also get a longer ban for appealing |
Yes, if
1) you lose the appeal, and
2) it is considered to be a time-wasting, frivalous appeal (i.e. you know you're bang to rights) |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 12:30 - Dec 17 with 3706 views | PrideOfTheEast |
| Cunha charged on 10:35 - Dec 17 by Portman_Pie |
Hope to see him serve at least a 3 game ban. |
It'll be a minimum of 5 surely. | | | |
| Cunha charged on 12:37 - Dec 17 with 3644 views | _clive_baker_ |
Had he done that to an opposition player on the pitch it’s violent conduct and at least a 3 game ban. That feels like a minimum in this instance, perhaps with a 4th on top for good measure. |  | | |
| Cunha charged on 12:42 - Dec 17 with 3594 views | Illinoisblue |
| Cunha charged on 12:08 - Dec 17 by patrickswell |
Watching the Town in 5 footage yesterday, I found myself thinking that at least one of our media team must have captured that incident at relatively close quarters. |
On that note, what did Delap do to get booked? Is there any footage of that. |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 12:47 - Dec 17 with 3538 views | Samuelowen88 |
| Cunha charged on 12:42 - Dec 17 by Illinoisblue |
On that note, what did Delap do to get booked? Is there any footage of that. |
Squared up to Ait Nouri at the end | |
| |
| Cunha charged on 13:21 - Dec 17 with 3359 views | SitfcB |
| Cunha charged on 12:42 - Dec 17 by Illinoisblue |
On that note, what did Delap do to get booked? Is there any footage of that. |
MOTD showed it but it was literally nothing. | |
| |
| Cunha charged on 13:27 - Dec 17 with 3304 views | baxterbasics |
Throw him to the Wolves. Oh... |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 13:57 - Dec 17 with 3148 views | Basuco |
| Cunha charged on 12:47 - Dec 17 by Samuelowen88 |
Squared up to Ait Nouri at the end |
The clip I saw it was not so much squared up to him, just speaking to him then laughing as KM led him away. Run of the mill sh@thousery really. |  | | |
| Cunha charged on 14:07 - Dec 17 with 3112 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Cunha charged on 13:21 - Dec 17 by SitfcB |
MOTD showed it but it was literally nothing. |
That's really annoying. If you're gonna get a yellow, at least earn it. |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 14:08 - Dec 17 with 3112 views | Basuco |
| Cunha charged on 12:13 - Dec 17 by BasingstokeBlue |
Yes, if
1) you lose the appeal, and
2) it is considered to be a time-wasting, frivalous appeal (i.e. you know you're bang to rights) |
It would make sense to appeal it, play against Leicester, then banned against one or more of Man Utd, Spurs, Forest, Bristol City, Newcastle, Chelsea, Arsenal, Villa. Bristol City doesn't matter and the others would be a struggle to get 2 points from the lot of them. Which is why the loss against us was so bad. | | | |
| Cunha charged on 15:35 - Dec 17 with 2919 views | AbujaBlue |
Some reports that they are appealing it, which means he could play against Leicester?
|  | | |
| Cunha charged on 15:36 - Dec 17 with 2906 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Cunha charged on 15:35 - Dec 17 by AbujaBlue |
Some reports that they are appealing it, which means he could play against Leicester?
|
Imagine the FA would deem that a frivolous appeal and add an extra game or two. | | | |
| Cunha charged on 15:40 - Dec 17 with 2880 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Cunha charged on 15:36 - Dec 17 by tractorboy1978 |
Imagine the FA would deem that a frivolous appeal and add an extra game or two. |
How can they appeal an elbow to the back of the head followed by nicking the guy’s glasses ffs ?! |  |
| |
| Cunha charged on 15:44 - Dec 17 with 2847 views | Samuelowen88 |
| Cunha charged on 15:40 - Dec 17 by Metal_Hacker |
How can they appeal an elbow to the back of the head followed by nicking the guy’s glasses ffs ?! |
They're playing the game.
Appeal = gets to play in the theoretically more winnable game
Personally think it's ideal for us.
Hopefully he plays against Leicester, earns them a draw then misses the next 6 matches. which they loose. | |
| |
| Cunha charged on 15:58 - Dec 17 with 2787 views | Basuco |
| Cunha charged on 15:44 - Dec 17 by Samuelowen88 |
They're playing the game.
Appeal = gets to play in the theoretically more winnable game
Personally think it's ideal for us.
Hopefully he plays against Leicester, earns them a draw then misses the next 6 matches. which they loose. |
The FA could hold the hearing on Friday, I'm sure they have done this in the past when a club tried to get a player to miss a more winnable match, but might be mistaken. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
