| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him 14:47 - Jul 14 with 3739 views | hunty21 |
If he goes for 35m then Chelsea be getting 8.75 m that's literally on 6.25 m profit hence we can't sell him for much less he s the one we can't lose he's the difference between promotion and missing out
Edit
If it's on profit alone then it's 3.75 depends what clause was inserted [Post edited 14 Jul 15:25]
|  | | |  |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 15:49 - Jul 14 with 640 views | hunty21 |
| | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:51 - Jul 14 with 625 views | blueasfook |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:31 - Jul 14 by FrimleyBlue |
Has the 25% been confirmed?
I'd be suprised if we agreed that high a figure when the release fee isn't even double what we paid. |
Hey Frimmers! Good to see you back. I thought Phil was a bit mean banning you last time. Good to see that he's seen sense. |  |
| |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:51 - Jul 14 with 624 views | hunty21 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:29 - Jul 14 by Freddies_Ears |
Guess you couldn't edit the headline...
We'll have a sell-on ourselves if he goes. |
You get the gist of it plus if we sold him for 30 m we would make even less profit.. | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:53 - Jul 14 with 605 views | FrimleyBlue |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:51 - Jul 14 by blueasfook |
Hey Frimmers! Good to see you back. I thought Phil was a bit mean banning you last time. Good to see that he's seen sense. |
Hey Blueas, all my own doing mate,
Good to be back in time for the pre season festivities :) |  |
| |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:55 - Jul 14 with 597 views | blueasfook |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:53 - Jul 14 by FrimleyBlue |
Hey Blueas, all my own doing mate,
Good to be back in time for the pre season festivities :) |
Always got your back buddy. Holler if you need my help. | |
| |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 16:00 - Jul 14 with 583 views | homer_123 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 15:49 - Jul 14 by hunty21 |
|
Given we don't get the sell on clause, you are actually correct in this post.
The sell on Clause isn't enough to replace him. |  |
| |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 16:09 - Jul 14 with 546 views | SimonBatfordITFC |
Awful lot of assumptions and speculation going on in this thread. Ultimately none of us know the finer details of the contract so all we can do is wait and see.
Or have another 10 pager. | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 16:16 - Jul 14 with 520 views | Scuzzer |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:09 - Jul 14 by BlueBadger |
Alright, Kwasi Kwarteng calm down. |
Rachel Theives surely. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 16:21 - Jul 14 with 499 views | hunty21 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 16:00 - Jul 14 by homer_123 |
Given we don't get the sell on clause, you are actually correct in this post.
The sell on Clause isn't enough to replace him. |
Clearly reading it wrong or just doing it for so.e giggles , you wouldn't buy much quality for 5m these days | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 16:22 - Jul 14 with 495 views | hunty21 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 16:09 - Jul 14 by SimonBatfordITFC |
Awful lot of assumptions and speculation going on in this thread. Ultimately none of us know the finer details of the contract so all we can do is wait and see.
Or have another 10 pager. |
Ultimately there will be one though... | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 16:27 - Jul 14 with 461 views | homer_123 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 16:21 - Jul 14 by hunty21 |
Clearly reading it wrong or just doing it for so.e giggles , you wouldn't buy much quality for 5m these days |
I'm reading the title as you've written it fella. | |
| |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 16:29 - Jul 14 with 460 views | hunty21 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 16:27 - Jul 14 by homer_123 |
I'm reading the title as you've written it fella. |
Yeah did you read the actual post though ... | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 16:35 - Jul 14 with 441 views | BlueBadger |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 16:16 - Jul 14 by Scuzzer |
Rachel Theives surely. |
Oh man, if you think she's bad, you should go Google Kwasi. You'll lose your sh1t. |  |
| |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 16:55 - Jul 14 with 399 views | nrb1985 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:36 - Jul 14 by FrimleyBlue |
I appreciate that and im not saying I have any issue if that's the case
but i don't see MA actually agreeing with that level of sell on clause, thats where I think he would have negotiated better and what he's good at
The relegation clause if that's what Omari asked for then thats not something he could resolve. |
To negotiate something you need to have something to offer the other side… | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:00 - Jul 14 with 381 views | bsw72 |
Just to confirm, you have basically made up a sell-on clause at a suitably high pecentage rate to make an argument you then fail to make correctly because your maths is rubbish.
I guess we have a lot more of this nonsense we have to put up before the transfer window closes . . . . |  | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:21 - Jul 14 with 342 views | SimonBatfordITFC |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:00 - Jul 14 by bsw72 |
Just to confirm, you have basically made up a sell-on clause at a suitably high pecentage rate to make an argument you then fail to make correctly because your maths is rubbish.
I guess we have a lot more of this nonsense we have to put up before the transfer window closes . . . . |
It has been reported in national press that Chelsea have a 25% sell on, OP hasn’t made it up. There’s no mention of whether it’s based on total fee or just the profit, that’s just been assumed. | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:29 - Jul 14 with 334 views | Axeldalai_lama |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:51 - Jul 14 by hunty21 |
You get the gist of it plus if we sold him for 30 m we would make even less profit.. |
No way, if we sell him for less money we, errm, make less money on him. Astounding. |  | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:31 - Jul 14 with 328 views | Blue_In_Boston |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 15:38 - Jul 14 by hunty21 |
Read the edit ... |
Your edit is 24 minutes after my post. You really are poor at maths... | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 17:34 - Jul 14 with 323 views | Axeldalai_lama |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not enough money to replace him (n/t) on 15:49 - Jul 14 by hunty21 |
|
We still get the actual money in our accounts though, so we still get £35 million or whatever minus the sell on.
We don't *have* to make a huge profit on everyone, if we sold everyone for what we paid, we'd still have £120 million that was for us going up.
Obviously ridiculously simplistic, but you get the gist, we are adding back to our pot with every sale, not needing to repay a debt. | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:51 - Jul 14 with 299 views | hunty21 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:31 - Jul 14 by Blue_In_Boston |
Your edit is 24 minutes after my post. You really are poor at maths... |
Sorry it's not up to your 10 second rule standards ... | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:54 - Jul 14 with 296 views | hunty21 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:00 - Jul 14 by bsw72 |
Just to confirm, you have basically made up a sell-on clause at a suitably high pecentage rate to make an argument you then fail to make correctly because your maths is rubbish.
I guess we have a lot more of this nonsense we have to put up before the transfer window closes . . . . |
Was confirmed on Twitter by Romano so yeah not exactly made up and sorry im not part of the exclusive teachers pet club jeez | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:56 - Jul 14 with 286 views | hunty21 |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:29 - Jul 14 by Axeldalai_lama |
No way, if we sell him for less money we, errm, make less money on him. Astounding. |
So my point is we do not sell him for any less than the relegation clause which alot of teams will want to negotiate, jeez not rocket science fella | | | |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:59 - Jul 14 with 277 views | Swansea_Blue |
Notwithstanding the dubious calculation ;) it would be a loss to lose him and get only <£10M profit from him. But as with Delap, these aren't players we've developed ourselves. We've picked them up and they've only spent 2 and 1 years with us, respectively. Both were established age group internationals, were with big clubs and in demand. Hutch especially we knew what he'd bring, so unfortunately we had to shell out quite a lot for them. We were obvious candidates for the drop, so I expect their agents pushed hard for generous (for them) release clauses. It is what it is.
It shows that we need to be developing our own players and being savvy with when we sell them. We should have made more off Downes, for example. I think we let him go for not much more than £1M, 12 months later he goes to West Ham for £12M and 24 months after that he goes to S'ton for £18M. Someone should be shot for us giving up our chance to recoup his development costs. In that context, making c. £10M profit on players we've not developed is not too bad. |  |
| |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 17:59 - Jul 14 with 271 views | FrimleyBlue |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 16:55 - Jul 14 by nrb1985 |
To negotiate something you need to have something to offer the other side… |
Of course and we offered them money.
Obv it could be the 25% mentioned. If it is then it is
But I could imagine however ashton going back to them and offering a 15/20% sell on however we will pay... for the immediate transfer. | |
| |
| 25% sell on clause for Omari= not making any money on him on 18:05 - Jul 14 with 259 views | Vaughan8 |
I'd suggest it not your problem so stop worrying about it.
If you're maths is that bad, then even more so. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
