| We shouldn't let Muric go.. 23:01 - Aug 8 with 2202 views | BlacknGoldnBlue |
With the new 8 second rule for goalkeepers its going to be imperative to have a keeper who good with his feet. That is not Palmer or Walton.
Muric should be our no.1 , he the best goalkeeper on the books. Let Walton move on and have Palmer as no2/cup keeper.
We'll regret letting Muric leave if that's what happens |  |
| |  |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:06 - Aug 9 with 278 views | Ryorry |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 10:20 - Aug 9 by southnorfolkblue |
Palmer is also prone to daft mistakes. The only difference is that his mistakes haven’t led to any goals yet.
In this division when we can expect more direct play against us and balls being put into the box, Muric is the man best equipped to deal with them imho. He wasn’t in the Championship team of the year a couple of years back for no reason |
Actually, the only difference is Palmer understanding that football is a *team* game, and him therefore bothering to communicate with and register the positioning of the other 10 whose unit he is supposed to be part of. They therefore have far more confidence in him (as does KM), leading to less confusion and nervousness at the back, leading to fewer future goals conceded.
Not to mention the morale sapping deflation of a lead being swiftly wiped out by a Muric Special blooper (though that might have been more applicable to last season, when it was so hard to score in the Prem). |  |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:20 - Aug 9 with 239 views | Ryorry |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 10:44 - Aug 9 by Horsham |
Yeah but I’m sure we could also find examples of players who did cut errors out - should be where quality coaching and psychology comes into its own.
I’m not saying I know the errors can be cut out but equally have a feeling there’s enough potential upside with Muric for someone to have a gamble on him and get lucky.
I’d want to be pretty sure we can’t realise the upside before we flush an £8m investment down the toilet. |
It’s sometimes just a false economy to keep a player. I trust KM & MA, who after all are the ones who really know what’s going on in the players’ heads and dressing room, to make the right decision. | |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:41 - Aug 9 with 197 views | GlasgowBlue |
Completely agree. |  |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:42 - Aug 9 with 193 views | GlasgowBlue |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 01:27 - Aug 9 by StNeotsBlue |
Not having this, he's a liability prone to daft mistakes,his performance against Southampton was the final nail.in the coffin for.us last year.
If KMc decides to play him he'll have my full support but I can't see it happening. |
Palmer has made far more mistakes than Muric but no been punished for them. Our stats with Muric in goal last season are better than with any of the other keepers we used. Fact. | |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:49 - Aug 9 with 180 views | Herbivore |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:42 - Aug 9 by GlasgowBlue |
Palmer has made far more mistakes than Muric but no been punished for them. Our stats with Muric in goal last season are better than with any of the other keepers we used. Fact. |
Correlation does not equal causation. Muric was a car crash, seems to have got a lot better in fans' eyes through not playing. |  |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:54 - Aug 9 with 157 views | GlasgowBlue |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:49 - Aug 9 by Herbivore |
Correlation does not equal causation. Muric was a car crash, seems to have got a lot better in fans' eyes through not playing. |
Not at all. I was very critical of Muric. But what we have brought in is worse imo. | |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:56 - Aug 9 with 154 views | pointofblue |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 10:53 - Aug 9 by Swoody |
The player bashing from some supporters is becoming a real issue, we have done 8 million on a goal keeper who was disliked before he even kicked a ball last year. It seems next up for the hate mob is Jack Clarke lets see if we can destroy his confidence and waste 20 million there too. Why are players getting singled out so much, if the the manager thinks they are good enough we as fans should just get behind the team! |
It's not as though they:re being judged before they've kicked a ball - neither Muric or Clarke have proven they're good enough to take the place of those who got us up in the first place. My mate, who's a Forest fan, sounded the alarm about Muric the moment we signed him but I ignored him. Unfortunately he was proven right. As for Clarke, I think Frimmers has it right - we're not utilising him in the right way. |  |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:57 - Aug 9 with 144 views | BseaBlue |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:54 - Aug 9 by GlasgowBlue |
Not at all. I was very critical of Muric. But what we have brought in is worse imo. |
Im not massively convinced by Palmer either. I know people have said the goalkeeping department is OK but I still don't think it suits how we play. Someone else has started a thread about not playing out from the back and you can't help but feel that this is because we dont have the confidence in Palmer to do what Hladky did. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:59 - Aug 9 with 138 views | Libero |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 10:50 - Aug 9 by FromReuserWithLove |
OK chief, you know best. |
Every source coming out of the club is reporting a great atmosphere, but you carry on making stuff up, lad. |  | | |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 12:14 - Aug 9 with 116 views | Herbivore |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 11:54 - Aug 9 by GlasgowBlue |
Not at all. I was very critical of Muric. But what we have brought in is worse imo. |
Can't agree with that. Palmer isn't brilliant but he's solid enough and the defence seem less shaky with him behind them. It's an area we'll need to upgrade if we go back up but Palmer is fine for this level. Muric is definitely not the answer, unless the question is which player has by far the worst major errors to minutes played ratio in the history of the Premier League. | |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 12:23 - Aug 9 with 95 views | GlasgowBlue |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 12:14 - Aug 9 by Herbivore |
Can't agree with that. Palmer isn't brilliant but he's solid enough and the defence seem less shaky with him behind them. It's an area we'll need to upgrade if we go back up but Palmer is fine for this level. Muric is definitely not the answer, unless the question is which player has by far the worst major errors to minutes played ratio in the history of the Premier League. |
When you look at the goals we scored in our promotions season which started with Vas passing out from the back, I think we are completely different team with Palmer. He worked well in a defensively minded Carlos Corberán WBA team but he's not a McKenna keeper in my opinion. Muric, at this level, really should be. [Post edited 9 Aug 12:24]
| |
| |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 12:30 - Aug 9 with 67 views | Herbivore |
| We shouldn't let Muric go.. on 12:23 - Aug 9 by GlasgowBlue |
When you look at the goals we scored in our promotions season which started with Vas passing out from the back, I think we are completely different team with Palmer. He worked well in a defensively minded Carlos Corberán WBA team but he's not a McKenna keeper in my opinion. Muric, at this level, really should be. [Post edited 9 Aug 12:24]
|
We also had Woolf at the back though, and look how many of our moves involved him. O'Shea is a good defender, but we badly miss Woolf's ability on the ball at the back. It's moot really with Muric as he's on his way out and for me that's the right call. I'd rather have a keeper who's better with his feet but it's not high on my priority list for us, Palmer is adequate which is rather damning with faint praise, but that's what he is imo. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
