Times change… 16:06 - Sep 1 with 683 views | Rorschach | Everyone is aware of that right? These players have been incredible for us and I am genuinely sad to see them go…but we need to move forward. |  |
| I'm not locked in here with you...you're locked in here with me. |
| |  |
Times change… on 16:11 - Sep 1 with 639 views | BLUEGOLD | We’ve binned off a really attractive tight team and replaced them with better individuals. Can he turn that into a great team quickly enough?? |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:13 - Sep 1 with 597 views | Rorschach |
Times change… on 16:11 - Sep 1 by BLUEGOLD | We’ve binned off a really attractive tight team and replaced them with better individuals. Can he turn that into a great team quickly enough?? |
Well, let’s find out… |  |
| I'm not locked in here with you...you're locked in here with me. |
|  |
Times change… on 16:13 - Sep 1 with 594 views | SWLondonBlue93 | Nobody doubts we need to move forward, I guess we will find out over the next few months if that is indeed what we are doing. It might turn out to be genius, but we were not obliged to bin off the promotion-winning side in the space of three transfer windows. |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:14 - Sep 1 with 572 views | springfield | Agree The double promotion team were legends. But ultimately they failed in the PL, and they know if we go back up they will be replaced As much as it's painful to see these guys go, it makes sense for them and us..... |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:16 - Sep 1 with 545 views | _clive_baker_ | I'm not really one for sentimentality of it tbh, things change and football moves on. My biggest gripe with the Chaplin deal is I still think he should have a role to play, we've spent a lot on players who don't bring us what he does, and we're effectively letting him go for peanuts. Same reason the Broadhead deal was regrettable wasn't for me that he played a massive part in those great back-to-back days, but that he's still quality. In his case the money made it make sense. I don't see the 'why' with Chaplin right now. |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:17 - Sep 1 with 522 views | FrimleyBlue | when you've got daisy duck on the wing and the tin man in goal, it's hard to get excited about changes when potentially wed be doing no worse if we still had the side that took us up, think that's the issue yes sure over time people leave but when chappers for example is STILL the only player who gets KM football and is able to quickly get the ball around the pitch, him leaving makes zero sense. I dunno, im at a loss right now, I don't know what our project is |  |
|  |
Times change… on 16:20 - Sep 1 with 487 views | petieboy2011 | I think the problem is that because we havent started the season on fire, it makes these exits more painful because the players leaving like Woolfie & Chappers were part of a successful team, whereas a lot of the players remaining at the club are yet to "set the world alight". In time hopefully we will all see that a change was the right thing, however IMO the pressure has just been cranked up a little more on McKenna & the players to get the results and performances we all want, especially now that "fan favourites" are going. Nothing lasts forever unfortunately. |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:21 - Sep 1 with 480 views | urbanpenguin |
Times change… on 16:11 - Sep 1 by BLUEGOLD | We’ve binned off a really attractive tight team and replaced them with better individuals. Can he turn that into a great team quickly enough?? |
That tight team wasn't that tight for many games last season, tbf. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
Times change… on 16:23 - Sep 1 with 431 views | SWLondonBlue93 |
Times change… on 16:21 - Sep 1 by urbanpenguin | That tight team wasn't that tight for many games last season, tbf. |
Last season's team was very different to the one that got us promoted. |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:23 - Sep 1 with 431 views | SitfcB | Whilst true it is a bit harder to accept when we are are work in progress although I am positive it will become good sooner rather than later. |  |
|  |
Times change… on 16:24 - Sep 1 with 416 views | Rorschach |
Times change… on 16:20 - Sep 1 by petieboy2011 | I think the problem is that because we havent started the season on fire, it makes these exits more painful because the players leaving like Woolfie & Chappers were part of a successful team, whereas a lot of the players remaining at the club are yet to "set the world alight". In time hopefully we will all see that a change was the right thing, however IMO the pressure has just been cranked up a little more on McKenna & the players to get the results and performances we all want, especially now that "fan favourites" are going. Nothing lasts forever unfortunately. |
Precisely this. Because we are hardly firing at the moment, the logical knee jerk reaction is to just play our old team. It’s a romantic notion, but one with little basis in reality. We are a team in transition and you’ll either have patience with that or you won’t… [Post edited 1 Sep 16:26]
|  |
| I'm not locked in here with you...you're locked in here with me. |
|  |
Times change… on 16:26 - Sep 1 with 385 views | SomethingBlue | We do. Let's see if we have the right players to do that with. In some cases the signs are good; in others the jury is very much out. McKenna needs to somehow get this all together and forge a new identity very quickly indeed. |  |
|  |
Times change… on 16:27 - Sep 1 with 369 views | tractor_lady |
Times change… on 16:14 - Sep 1 by springfield | Agree The double promotion team were legends. But ultimately they failed in the PL, and they know if we go back up they will be replaced As much as it's painful to see these guys go, it makes sense for them and us..... |
Or would do if we had brought players who will perform in the prem… not sure we have atm |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:32 - Sep 1 with 304 views | BLUEGOLD |
Times change… on 16:21 - Sep 1 by urbanpenguin | That tight team wasn't that tight for many games last season, tbf. |
The players and the way we played weren’t good enough for the PL, but they didn’t down tools as far as I could see |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:32 - Sep 1 with 298 views | BseaBlue | They do indeed. However, off of the back of last season it was vital to get off to a good start to give everyone confidence and turn the negativity on its head. That hasn't happened and we have now moved on a majority of the people that got us promoted last time round. In my opinion, all that has done is add massive pressure to MA and KM to get things going, very, very quickly. Football is not a patient sport anymore and sentiment soon gets lost (particularly when those players leave) |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:32 - Sep 1 with 298 views | pointofblue |
Times change… on 16:23 - Sep 1 by SWLondonBlue93 | Last season's team was very different to the one that got us promoted. |
Agreed. I can:t believe people are trying to say the promoted team were the problem last year. It was nothing like the same XI. Tuanzebe, Davis, Morsy and Hutchinson were the only ones to be given a consistent chance. And Tuanzebe missed out on a few games due to injury. |  |
|  |
Times change… on 16:41 - Sep 1 with 197 views | le2blue |
Times change… on 16:26 - Sep 1 by SomethingBlue | We do. Let's see if we have the right players to do that with. In some cases the signs are good; in others the jury is very much out. McKenna needs to somehow get this all together and forge a new identity very quickly indeed. |
Going to be very interesting, he's ended up with the same task that Scott Parker had at Burnley last season. He did mention last week that he was building a new team, which appears to be accurate, given that most of the League 1 players have been exited. |  | |  |
Times change… on 16:42 - Sep 1 with 184 views | reusersfreekicks |
Times change… on 16:11 - Sep 1 by BLUEGOLD | We’ve binned off a really attractive tight team and replaced them with better individuals. Can he turn that into a great team quickly enough?? |
That remains to be seen |  | |  |
| |