| Wolves Sack Pereira 11:45 - Nov 2 with 1842 views | FrimleyBlue | Who we reckon will go in I think Tel Hag |  |
| |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 11:46 - Nov 2 with 1639 views | ITFC_Forever | McKenna… I’ll say it before everyone else does. |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 11:54 - Nov 2 with 1580 views | pointofblue | Shame he didn't have these issues from the off. [Post edited 2 Nov 11:54]
|  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:07 - Nov 2 with 1478 views | Everydayblue | They look doomed atm... Hard to see who'd want to try and turn that one around. Graham Potter? To steal another wage.. |  | |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:19 - Nov 2 with 1417 views | cressi | Brendon Rogers |  | |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:20 - Nov 2 with 1400 views | berkstractorboy |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:07 - Nov 2 by Everydayblue | They look doomed atm... Hard to see who'd want to try and turn that one around. Graham Potter? To steal another wage.. |
The Sweden manager? |  | |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:20 - Nov 2 with 1401 views | WeWereZombies |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:07 - Nov 2 by Everydayblue | They look doomed atm... Hard to see who'd want to try and turn that one around. Graham Potter? To steal another wage.. |
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c201514er26o 'Former West Ham manager Graham Potter is set to accept the job as Sweden head coach. The 50-year-old has been offered the role on an initial short-term basis in a bid to aid Sweden's faltering World Cup qualification campaign.' So, no. |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:22 - Nov 2 with 1389 views | Everydayblue | Wouldn't be surprised if clubs higher up the food chain start looking at Jakirovic at Hull City..... What he's doing there is pretty impressive. |  | |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:24 - Nov 2 with 1379 views | BloomBlue | Gary O'Neil |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:29 - Nov 2 with 1330 views | cbower | Some foreign coach we've never heard of is my guess. As long as we don’t start McKenna speculation, I don't care. |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:31 - Nov 2 with 1303 views | WeWereZombies | Ange Postecoglou is available... |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:34 - Nov 2 with 1273 views | Cheltenham_Blue | Only one man for the job. |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:49 - Nov 2 with 1193 views | gainsboroughblue | Proper hero to zero story that one. Wolves pretty much had Champions League form not long after we beat them at Molineux. Unsure what would've been so different had anybody been in charge this season. They do have the look of a club on their way down. |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:51 - Nov 2 with 1176 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:49 - Nov 2 by gainsboroughblue | Proper hero to zero story that one. Wolves pretty much had Champions League form not long after we beat them at Molineux. Unsure what would've been so different had anybody been in charge this season. They do have the look of a club on their way down. |
Well we did say wolves were nothing without cunha Just a shame of us, they only realised after staying up. |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:57 - Nov 2 with 1126 views | HighgateBlue |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:29 - Nov 2 by cbower | Some foreign coach we've never heard of is my guess. As long as we don’t start McKenna speculation, I don't care. |
Surely McKenna is even less likely to go to Wolves than to Celtic. Already 8 points off safety having got 2 points from 10. Let their best players go, so nothing like the squad they had when they last changed manager. Heading straight back down. You'd think that they're less likely to be in the Prem next season than us! (And for what it's worth, the bookies agree with that) Less likely than any English-based McKenna link we've heard so far. I think this one is totally safe. |  | |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 13:02 - Nov 2 with 1096 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 12:57 - Nov 2 by HighgateBlue | Surely McKenna is even less likely to go to Wolves than to Celtic. Already 8 points off safety having got 2 points from 10. Let their best players go, so nothing like the squad they had when they last changed manager. Heading straight back down. You'd think that they're less likely to be in the Prem next season than us! (And for what it's worth, the bookies agree with that) Less likely than any English-based McKenna link we've heard so far. I think this one is totally safe. |
There is absolutely no way McKenna goes to Wolves, any conversation about it is totally pointless. They are nailed on for relegation, esp. with the squad they have. Strand-Larsen will want out of there in January too. |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 13:08 - Nov 2 with 1058 views | BouncebackIpswich |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 13:02 - Nov 2 by Cheltenham_Blue | There is absolutely no way McKenna goes to Wolves, any conversation about it is totally pointless. They are nailed on for relegation, esp. with the squad they have. Strand-Larsen will want out of there in January too. |
They are a Premier League club and been there a few years, if they come in for him it will seriously tempt him I think your first sentence is hyperbole |  | |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 14:01 - Nov 2 with 926 views | bournemouthblue | It will be another random Portuguese manager? Victor Pereira who did a remarkable for them last season seems to be a one season specialist, virtually every stint he has is about a season |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 14:40 - Nov 2 with 838 views | GavTWTD | According to the pinkun forum, they wouldnt be interested in him replacing Manning. |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 14:45 - Nov 2 with 813 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 14:40 - Nov 2 by GavTWTD | According to the pinkun forum, they wouldnt be interested in him replacing Manning. |
It would be underwhelming for them wouldn't it? Which, if they think it through, should point them heavily towards the question are they able to do any better than Manning? |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 14:57 - Nov 2 with 773 views | Sharkey | Sam Allardyce is a Wolves fan, I think. Perhaps now's the moment. |  | |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 15:10 - Nov 2 with 736 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 14:45 - Nov 2 by Nthsuffolkblue | It would be underwhelming for them wouldn't it? Which, if they think it through, should point them heavily towards the question are they able to do any better than Manning? |
Russell Martin's name is coming up! |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 15:36 - Nov 2 with 692 views | bournemouthblue |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 15:10 - Nov 2 by Nthsuffolkblue | Russell Martin's name is coming up! |
That would be fun, I've heard Carrick mentioned Those with ex-Budgie connections would include Gary O'Neil who I think is massively overrated, Russell Martin who again has generally been middling and someone like Steve Bruce or Martin O'Neil? |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 15:47 - Nov 2 with 661 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 15:36 - Nov 2 by bournemouthblue | That would be fun, I've heard Carrick mentioned Those with ex-Budgie connections would include Gary O'Neil who I think is massively overrated, Russell Martin who again has generally been middling and someone like Steve Bruce or Martin O'Neil? |
Paul Lambert is available. Paul Cook? I don't think Paul Hurst played for them did he? |  |
|  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 15:49 - Nov 2 with 649 views | stiff_talking |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 15:36 - Nov 2 by bournemouthblue | That would be fun, I've heard Carrick mentioned Those with ex-Budgie connections would include Gary O'Neil who I think is massively overrated, Russell Martin who again has generally been middling and someone like Steve Bruce or Martin O'Neil? |
You can’t hire manager who has failed to win a relegation battle or hasn’t experienced one. This limits Wolves options. |  | |  |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 17:09 - Nov 2 with 510 views | bournemouthblue |
| Wolves Sack Pereira on 15:47 - Nov 2 by Nthsuffolkblue | Paul Lambert is available. Paul Cook? I don't think Paul Hurst played for them did he? |
Certainly connected to them? |  |
|  |
| |