| Pam Bondi sacked 18:14 - Apr 2 with 1514 views | J2BLUE |
I wonder if any of these people who leave the administration ever look back and wonder what the hell they were doing. [Post edited 2 Apr 21:09]
|  |
| |  |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:23 - Apr 2 with 1445 views | ElderGrizzly |
He’s kept her and Noem in ‘new roles’, so they can’t turn on him.
Imagine what she knows and what she has buried on Epstein for him.
The new interim AG was his own personal Attorney before he was President
[Post edited 2 Apr 18:23]
|  | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:25 - Apr 2 with 1423 views | positivity |
scaramucci is probably the most honest one |  |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:28 - Apr 2 with 1406 views | TheMoralMajority |
Didn't see that coming. Clearly wasn't disingenuous enough for Trump. I dread to think who the replacement will be given that. |  |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:28 - Apr 2 with 1399 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:25 - Apr 2 by positivity |
scaramucci is probably the most honest one |
The Mooch doesn't hold back does he? Do you listen to The Rest Is Politics USA? |  |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:31 - Apr 2 with 1394 views | positivity |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:28 - Apr 2 by GlasgowBlue |
The Mooch doesn't hold back does he? Do you listen to The Rest Is Politics USA? |
i've only seen him on more low-brow comedy stuff, but he doesn't mess about (or let himself of the hook, which is refreshing) | |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:36 - Apr 2 with 1358 views | RadioOrwell |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:25 - Apr 2 by positivity |
scaramucci is probably the most honest one |
He sounds like an interesting bloke. Quite smart. |  | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:39 - Apr 2 with 1349 views | RadioOrwell |
That Congressional hearing where she appeared to lose her mind looks like even Trump thinks she lost her mind. | | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:47 - Apr 2 with 1306 views | DJR |
This from Trump made me laugh.
"she will be transitioning to a much needed and important new job in the private sector, to be announced at a date in the near future." |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Pam Bondi sacked on 19:59 - Apr 2 with 1134 views | BasingstokeBlue |
Why the hell they were doing what? [Post edited 2 Apr 20:00]
|  |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 20:30 - Apr 2 with 1051 views | Mookamoo |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:39 - Apr 2 by RadioOrwell |
That Congressional hearing where she appeared to lose her mind looks like even Trump thinks she lost her mind. |
Can't help but think that won't be the last time we see her in front of a congrestional hearing.
The Dems will come for her when they have the chance |  | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 21:34 - Apr 2 with 947 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:39 - Apr 2 by RadioOrwell |
That Congressional hearing where she appeared to lose her mind looks like even Trump thinks she lost her mind. |
She’s been moved aside because she wasn’t corrupt enough.
Blanche will do exactly as he is told. | | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 21:41 - Apr 2 with 934 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:25 - Apr 2 by positivity |
scaramucci is probably the most honest one |
Can he do the fandango? |  |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 06:29 - Apr 3 with 725 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:23 - Apr 2 by ElderGrizzly |
He’s kept her and Noem in ‘new roles’, so they can’t turn on him.
Imagine what she knows and what she has buried on Epstein for him.
The new interim AG was his own personal Attorney before he was President
[Post edited 2 Apr 18:23]
|
And this is why he is there and Bondi no longer is.
Persecution of Trump’s enemies
| | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 07:49 - Apr 3 with 652 views | Churchman |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 06:29 - Apr 3 by ElderGrizzly |
And this is why he is there and Bondi no longer is.
Persecution of Trump’s enemies
|
But given the Trumpington is always right then the purging of his enemies is the right thing to do. Why would you not?
Putting in people that will do your bidding and never challenge means longer days cheating on the golf course. There is less time wasted on everything and less irritation because as supreme leader you can make all those decisions quickly and easily with all your henchmen willingly telling you how great you are.
You are always right, all seeing all knowing. You don’t need the democratic controls, Senate, Congress. Just a big table and the Disney Channel. He is beyond dangerous supported by his weak, stupid people.
It’s about time Starmer in particular and the rest of Europeans started getting to grips with this. We are woefully under prepared for a world falling into chaos. |  | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 08:03 - Apr 3 with 624 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 07:49 - Apr 3 by Churchman |
But given the Trumpington is always right then the purging of his enemies is the right thing to do. Why would you not?
Putting in people that will do your bidding and never challenge means longer days cheating on the golf course. There is less time wasted on everything and less irritation because as supreme leader you can make all those decisions quickly and easily with all your henchmen willingly telling you how great you are.
You are always right, all seeing all knowing. You don’t need the democratic controls, Senate, Congress. Just a big table and the Disney Channel. He is beyond dangerous supported by his weak, stupid people.
It’s about time Starmer in particular and the rest of Europeans started getting to grips with this. We are woefully under prepared for a world falling into chaos. |
I agree with everything you say, apart from the last bit. What exactly do you mean, in practical terms, that Starmer and the rest of Europe should do in order to "get to grips with this"? |  |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 08:11 - Apr 3 with 610 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 19:59 - Apr 2 by BasingstokeBlue |
Why the hell they were doing what? [Post edited 2 Apr 20:00]
|
Facilitating the corruption of the US administration, presumably |  |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 09:08 - Apr 3 with 528 views | Churchman |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 18:25 - Apr 2 by positivity |
scaramucci is probably the most honest one |
Wasn’t he a baddie in a Bond film? | | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 09:18 - Apr 3 with 510 views | Churchman |
This from The Hill tells you all you need to know:
“Pam Bondi used the machinery of federal law enforcement not to pursue justice, but to carry out political vendettas at the direction of the President,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (Md.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement that remarked on Bondi’s “humiliating subservience to Trump.”
“The Attorney General has the best lawyer’s job in America. The mission is justice, and the clients are the American people. But Pam Bondi abandoned that mission, indeed never accepted it. She never acted as anything but Donald Trump’s personal criminal defense and personal injury attorney, transforming the people’s Department of Justice into the President’s private instrument of vengeance, targeting his critics with a bureaucracy of vendetta while canceling out justice for his favored political friends and allies.” | | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 09:31 - Apr 3 with 483 views | brogansnose |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 09:08 - Apr 3 by Churchman |
Wasn’t he a baddie in a Bond film? |
I think you're mistaking him from that Queen song where he does the fandango. |  | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 10:14 - Apr 3 with 444 views | Churchman |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 08:03 - Apr 3 by The_Flashing_Smile |
I agree with everything you say, apart from the last bit. What exactly do you mean, in practical terms, that Starmer and the rest of Europe should do in order to "get to grips with this"? |
To decide whether to fawn and grovel to Trump as Starmer and to a lesser degree Macron and the rest have in a vain bid to maintain things as they were or to accept the change/threat that’s staring them in the face, economically and militarily.
It’s natural for human beings to resist change. I get a sense they are clinging on to structures and the ‘old order’ that’s finished. Sending out poor old King Charles is a classic example. It’s clearly promoted by the government in a vain attempt to stop Trump using Starmer as a bog rag by appealing to the orange one’s vanity.
Two examples, there was a speech yesterday by the orange idiot. It was thought he might announce US withdrawal from NATO. Technically he cannot do it without Congress approval, but practically he can by with withdrawal of assets and intelligence sharing, but this misses the point.
It makes no difference. NATO is dead. Finished. Would Trump lift a finger if say Poland was invaded? Of course not. Solution? Like minded countries need to come together and start planning a future without the US and without them knowing.
In economic terms, shtgibbon announced 100% tariffs on import of pharmaceuticals, reduced for certain countries, even lower for the U.K. if a trade agreement is reached. Whoopee. There will be no trade agreement with the US. There never has been. There never will be unless it favours the US. Get to grips with it and start say looking for markets elsewhere as Canada has.
Carney has faced the reality of the situation. I don’t think U.K. and the rest of the Europeans have. They’ll have far more leverage acting together on certain things than scrambling around as individuals. This applies not just to the U.K.
This is very much undistllled thoughts in instant response to your question. Happy for it to be ripped to bits or challenged of course, given that’s what discussion is for. | | | |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 11:26 - Apr 3 with 385 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 10:14 - Apr 3 by Churchman |
To decide whether to fawn and grovel to Trump as Starmer and to a lesser degree Macron and the rest have in a vain bid to maintain things as they were or to accept the change/threat that’s staring them in the face, economically and militarily.
It’s natural for human beings to resist change. I get a sense they are clinging on to structures and the ‘old order’ that’s finished. Sending out poor old King Charles is a classic example. It’s clearly promoted by the government in a vain attempt to stop Trump using Starmer as a bog rag by appealing to the orange one’s vanity.
Two examples, there was a speech yesterday by the orange idiot. It was thought he might announce US withdrawal from NATO. Technically he cannot do it without Congress approval, but practically he can by with withdrawal of assets and intelligence sharing, but this misses the point.
It makes no difference. NATO is dead. Finished. Would Trump lift a finger if say Poland was invaded? Of course not. Solution? Like minded countries need to come together and start planning a future without the US and without them knowing.
In economic terms, shtgibbon announced 100% tariffs on import of pharmaceuticals, reduced for certain countries, even lower for the U.K. if a trade agreement is reached. Whoopee. There will be no trade agreement with the US. There never has been. There never will be unless it favours the US. Get to grips with it and start say looking for markets elsewhere as Canada has.
Carney has faced the reality of the situation. I don’t think U.K. and the rest of the Europeans have. They’ll have far more leverage acting together on certain things than scrambling around as individuals. This applies not just to the U.K.
This is very much undistllled thoughts in instant response to your question. Happy for it to be ripped to bits or challenged of course, given that’s what discussion is for. |
I've seen you say similar before about fawning and groveling, but I don't see any actual evidence of it. In fact Starmer has put his foot down and said we're not entering Trump's war, angering Trump in the process.
What you describe as fawning and groveling I think is diplomacy and general politeness. You have to treat Trump with kid gloves because he just slaps massive tariffs on your country, which affects the likes of you and me. Starmer would get slaughted if that happened too, so he's damned either way.
We've been looking for markets since Brexit, it's all very well saying these things but the real world's a bit harder. I do agree Europe should be coming together in some capacity though.
One thing to bear in mind is Trump won't be here forever. Holding our noses and waiting for time to take its course isn't sexy, but it also isn't the worst way to deal with the seemingly untouchable shtgibbon. | |
| |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 13:17 - Apr 3 with 285 views | Churchman |
| Pam Bondi sacked on 11:26 - Apr 3 by The_Flashing_Smile |
I've seen you say similar before about fawning and groveling, but I don't see any actual evidence of it. In fact Starmer has put his foot down and said we're not entering Trump's war, angering Trump in the process.
What you describe as fawning and groveling I think is diplomacy and general politeness. You have to treat Trump with kid gloves because he just slaps massive tariffs on your country, which affects the likes of you and me. Starmer would get slaughted if that happened too, so he's damned either way.
We've been looking for markets since Brexit, it's all very well saying these things but the real world's a bit harder. I do agree Europe should be coming together in some capacity though.
One thing to bear in mind is Trump won't be here forever. Holding our noses and waiting for time to take its course isn't sexy, but it also isn't the worst way to deal with the seemingly untouchable shtgibbon. |
This article is a little out of date (Sept 25) but captures what I feel about this.
https://www.theguardian.com/co | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
