| TEAM: 14:00 - Aug 24 with 2546 views | SitfcB |
|  |
| |  |
| TEAM: on 14:01 - Aug 24 with 2470 views | Girthyguy |
No Wolf but think we will be ok |  | | |
| TEAM: on 14:01 - Aug 24 with 2469 views | ITFCBlues |
Judge on the left ffs |  |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:02 - Aug 24 with 2395 views | pointofblue |
| TEAM: on 14:01 - Aug 24 by ITFCBlues |
Judge on the left ffs |
He might switch with Edwards as the game goes on. Would have possibly preferred to see Georgiou out there to be honest. | |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:03 - Aug 24 with 2368 views | itfc_bucks |
If we persist with Judge on the left, we may as well have sold him to QPR, he's simply not a winger. | | | |
| TEAM: on 14:03 - Aug 24 with 2360 views | J2BLUE |
| TEAM: on 14:01 - Aug 24 by ITFCBlues |
Judge on the left ffs |
We should win this comfortably. 1-2 changes like that should be fine. |  |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:05 - Aug 24 with 2284 views | BLUEBEAT |
| TEAM: on 14:03 - Aug 24 by itfc_bucks |
If we persist with Judge on the left, we may as well have sold him to QPR, he's simply not a winger. |
He won’t like it either.
How many times will he leave Kenlock exposed today, I wonder? |  |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:05 - Aug 24 with 2244 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
That's 5 changes isn't it?
Jackson and Vincent-Young coming in are strengthening, Wilson has good experience to rest Woolfenden and the same with Edwards and Judge for Rowe and Dozzell.
Looks a sensible line-up if you are going to rest those 3, to me. No El Mizouni on the bench, did he pick up a knock? I guess with Huws returning, someone had to drop out but I liked the look of him on Saturday. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| TEAM: on 14:11 - Aug 24 with 2063 views | pointofblue |
| TEAM: on 14:03 - Aug 24 by J2BLUE |
We should win this comfortably. 1-2 changes like that should be fine. |
As said, five changes rather than 1-2.
Vincent-Young, Chambers, Edwards, Judge and Jackson for Donacien, Woolfenden, Dozzell, Rowe and El Mizouni.
To be fair it looks far stronger than the team which started on Tuesday. | |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:12 - Aug 24 with 2053 views | Naylorsboots |
| TEAM: on 14:01 - Aug 24 by ITFCBlues |
Judge on the left ffs |
Agreed. Utter waste of his talent. He just leaves Kenlock exposed on the left. Why sign a guy to play no. 10 then constantly play him out of position? |  | | |
| TEAM: on 14:13 - Aug 24 with 2014 views | J2BLUE |
| TEAM: on 14:11 - Aug 24 by pointofblue |
As said, five changes rather than 1-2.
Vincent-Young, Chambers, Edwards, Judge and Jackson for Donacien, Woolfenden, Dozzell, Rowe and El Mizouni.
To be fair it looks far stronger than the team which started on Tuesday. |
1-2 changes 'like that'. As in out of position etc. | |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:17 - Aug 24 with 1912 views | pointofblue |
| TEAM: on 14:13 - Aug 24 by J2BLUE |
1-2 changes 'like that'. As in out of position etc. |
Ah apologies, misunderstood.
I would love to see Judge in his preferred position but we'd probably have to switch to one up front to see it happen. | |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:20 - Aug 24 with 1868 views | clive_baker |
Reality is we could’ve played a number of combinations and ‘should’ have more than enough for Bolton. Application is the key rather than personnel. I don’t know too much about the Bolton yoofs but if any of their kids have some pace about them they might fancy a run against Wilson & Chambers. Either way we should have more than enough. Personally I would’ve started 2 from Judge, Huws and Dozzell but would be mice to see the others get on at some point and get some minutes under their belt. |  |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:21 - Aug 24 with 1828 views | ParisBlue |
| TEAM: on 14:20 - Aug 24 by clive_baker |
Reality is we could’ve played a number of combinations and ‘should’ have more than enough for Bolton. Application is the key rather than personnel. I don’t know too much about the Bolton yoofs but if any of their kids have some pace about them they might fancy a run against Wilson & Chambers. Either way we should have more than enough. Personally I would’ve started 2 from Judge, Huws and Dozzell but would be mice to see the others get on at some point and get some minutes under their belt. |
Would have liked to see Dozzell play against his own age group.
Let’s not forget it took Palace 80 mins to break down our youth team 2 years ago. |  |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:21 - Aug 24 with 1824 views | Naylorsboots |
| TEAM: on 14:20 - Aug 24 by clive_baker |
Reality is we could’ve played a number of combinations and ‘should’ have more than enough for Bolton. Application is the key rather than personnel. I don’t know too much about the Bolton yoofs but if any of their kids have some pace about them they might fancy a run against Wilson & Chambers. Either way we should have more than enough. Personally I would’ve started 2 from Judge, Huws and Dozzell but would be mice to see the others get on at some point and get some minutes under their belt. |
Dozzell is well over rated. One of the very few things Hurst was right about. | | | |
| TEAM: on 14:22 - Aug 24 with 1818 views | Trequartista |
That line-up has Judge on the left but isn't that just guesswork from the club twitter account. I wouldn't think the manager would want to disclose which position each player is going to play? |  |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:27 - Aug 24 with 1763 views | pointofblue |
| TEAM: on 14:22 - Aug 24 by Trequartista |
That line-up has Judge on the left but isn't that just guesswork from the club twitter account. I wouldn't think the manager would want to disclose which position each player is going to play? |
Because of Edwards' presence I can only presume he will be on one of the wings. If it was Dozzell instead, for example, we could surmise that we were possibly playing a narrow diamond instead. | |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:29 - Aug 24 with 1713 views | clive_baker |
| TEAM: on 14:27 - Aug 24 by pointofblue |
Because of Edwards' presence I can only presume he will be on one of the wings. If it was Dozzell instead, for example, we could surmise that we were possibly playing a narrow diamond instead. |
Yeah, almost certainly 4-4-2 | |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:30 - Aug 24 with 1700 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| TEAM: on 14:27 - Aug 24 by pointofblue |
Because of Edwards' presence I can only presume he will be on one of the wings. If it was Dozzell instead, for example, we could surmise that we were possibly playing a narrow diamond instead. |
and herein is the problem. Judge may prefer and be more suited to a number 10 role, but Norwood looks better with Jackson alongside him.
This leaves us doing one or the other or having a narrow midfield that exposes Kenlock and Vincent-Young. | |
| |
| TEAM: on 14:33 - Aug 24 with 1653 views | TIB |
Weren't we linked with Brockbank a while back? |  |
| |
| TEAM: on 15:12 - Aug 24 with 1486 views | SpruceMoose |
| TEAM: on 14:21 - Aug 24 by Naylorsboots |
Dozzell is well over rated. One of the very few things Hurst was right about. |
Oh Mulley.
Have a word with yourself lad. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| TEAM: on 15:39 - Aug 24 with 1407 views | wkj |
| TEAM: on 15:12 - Aug 24 by SpruceMoose |
Oh Mulley.
Have a word with yourself lad. |
 |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
