| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially 08:14 - Sep 6 with 2538 views | ElderGrizzly |
|  | | |  |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 09:07 - Sep 6 with 2423 views | Swansea_Blue |
That's nice of them. Not the brightest move given some of the stereotyping linked to them!! |  |
| |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 09:22 - Sep 6 with 2367 views | MonkeyAlan |
Silly Spurs |  | | |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 10:12 - Sep 6 with 2289 views | brazil1982 |
The same with Arsenal. To be fair if you've paid a premium price I suppose there has to be benefits. |  | | |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 11:01 - Sep 6 with 2213 views | Ace_High1 |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 10:12 - Sep 6 by brazil1982 |
The same with Arsenal. To be fair if you've paid a premium price I suppose there has to be benefits. |
Yes can't see any issue with this. They will want to maximum their revenue and if numbers are restricted, then why not get in the ones that pay the most for their ticket. Makes good business sense. |  | | |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 12:54 - Sep 6 with 2131 views | allezlesbleus |
It would have been a shame seeing all those prawn sandwiches going to waste. |  | | |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 13:28 - Sep 6 with 2069 views | SamWhiteUK |
I don't see the problem here |  | | |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 13:31 - Sep 6 with 2063 views | WD19 |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 13:28 - Sep 6 by SamWhiteUK |
I don't see the problem here |
It makes perfect logical sense, but it is still a bit of an unnecessary PR gaffe. Could have easily been masked with some kind of ballot for longest serving season ticket holders or key workers getting some preferential treatment/place in a ballot too. |  | | |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 14:07 - Sep 6 with 2001 views | gernon |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 11:01 - Sep 6 by Ace_High1 |
Yes can't see any issue with this. They will want to maximum their revenue and if numbers are restricted, then why not get in the ones that pay the most for their ticket. Makes good business sense. |
That's fine if their only goal is to maximise revenue. Don't understand clubs at their level only having this as a their only criteria though.
There's a reason why most businesses don't have active fans forums. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 14:08 - Sep 6 with 2001 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 13:31 - Sep 6 by WD19 |
It makes perfect logical sense, but it is still a bit of an unnecessary PR gaffe. Could have easily been masked with some kind of ballot for longest serving season ticket holders or key workers getting some preferential treatment/place in a ballot too. |
If you were to ask, what would a typical Levy response be, this would be it. £££ over anything.
It's like when he furloughed staff. PR disaster. | | | |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 14:14 - Sep 6 with 1991 views | BryanPlug |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
| |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 17:58 - Sep 6 with 1851 views | Keaneish |
Why not open it up to the 4,000 longest serving supporters or those who travel the furthest or spend the most on travel on top off their expensive ticket prices? Maybe supporters who do most for the community?
These types of decisions show how elitist football is as the highest payers are corporates. [Post edited 6 Sep 2020 18:03]
|  |
| |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 18:04 - Sep 6 with 1832 views | PJH |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 17:58 - Sep 6 by Keaneish |
Why not open it up to the 4,000 longest serving supporters or those who travel the furthest or spend the most on travel on top off their expensive ticket prices? Maybe supporters who do most for the community?
These types of decisions show how elitist football is as the highest payers are corporates. [Post edited 6 Sep 2020 18:03]
|
Or anyone that saw Spurs win the League-they would have to be at least in their mid to late sixties but.... |  | | |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 18:09 - Sep 6 with 1813 views | vapour_trail |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 17:58 - Sep 6 by Keaneish |
Why not open it up to the 4,000 longest serving supporters or those who travel the furthest or spend the most on travel on top off their expensive ticket prices? Maybe supporters who do most for the community?
These types of decisions show how elitist football is as the highest payers are corporates. [Post edited 6 Sep 2020 18:03]
|
Not sure maximising travel to deliver covid friendly football and is going to wash.
Go and think about what you’ve done. |  |
| |
| Evans should apply a similar principle here.... on 18:20 - Sep 6 with 1801 views | Bloots |
....those that have paid their season ticket in full should get preference over those that pay in installments.
Simple. |  |
| "Great to see you back on here mate, I was considering deactivating my account if you hadn’t returned" - TWTD User (Aug 2025) |
| |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 21:31 - Sep 6 with 1652 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 13:31 - Sep 6 by WD19 |
It makes perfect logical sense, but it is still a bit of an unnecessary PR gaffe. Could have easily been masked with some kind of ballot for longest serving season ticket holders or key workers getting some preferential treatment/place in a ballot too. |
It makes financial sense. Whether that should be seen as logical or ethical for a sport that’s been founded on working class fans is another issue. Inevitable may be the best description. [Post edited 6 Sep 2020 22:26]
| |
| |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 04:29 - Sep 7 with 1562 views | TractorWood |
| Spurs only letting in the highest paying supporters initially on 17:58 - Sep 6 by Keaneish |
Why not open it up to the 4,000 longest serving supporters or those who travel the furthest or spend the most on travel on top off their expensive ticket prices? Maybe supporters who do most for the community?
These types of decisions show how elitist football is as the highest payers are corporates. [Post edited 6 Sep 2020 18:03]
|
Pandemic. Travel bad. |  |
| |
| Evans should apply a similar principle here.... on 11:23 - Sep 7 with 1407 views | Freddies_Ears |
| Evans should apply a similar principle here.... on 18:20 - Sep 6 by Bloots |
....those that have paid their season ticket in full should get preference over those that pay in installments.
Simple. |
One article said that Spurs' premium / corporate members had to pay in full for this season in March. I'm guessing they'd expect a bit of preferential treatment for that! | | | |
| Evans should apply a similar principle here.... on 13:51 - Sep 7 with 1344 views | Ryorry |
| Evans should apply a similar principle here.... on 11:23 - Sep 7 by Freddies_Ears |
One article said that Spurs' premium / corporate members had to pay in full for this season in March. I'm guessing they'd expect a bit of preferential treatment for that! |
Even so, it's just another nail in the coffin of football and football league fanbases as they used to be before the Prem came along to turn clubs into global business corporations. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
