Jordan Jones 10:42 - Jul 28 with 4820 views | TractorCam |
Going for players which aren't high priority to stop rivals getting them 👀 | |
| | |
Jordan Jones on 10:45 - Jul 28 with 4714 views | OwainG1992 | Talented footballer. Good Winger. What a fun transfer window this has been. | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 10:45 - Jul 28 with 4703 views | Kieran_Knows | He'd be another good signing, although frustrating that it would be a loan. | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 10:51 - Jul 28 with 4557 views | MrTown | Talented boy. Had a really good spell at Kilmarnock that got him his move to Rangers, which hasn't worked out. His half a season loan at Sunderland showed what he can do - 3 goals 4 assists. At 26 needs to find a settled home and be playing regularly again. | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 10:51 - Jul 28 with 4557 views | abracaDOBRA_ | I swear you always say how unreliable they are and only write stories for clicks on their website | | | |
Jordan Jones on 10:52 - Jul 28 with 4517 views | rayman_10 |
Jordan Jones on 10:45 - Jul 28 by Kieran_Knows | He'd be another good signing, although frustrating that it would be a loan. |
That doesn’t make sense to me. Turns 27 this season so unlikely to improve to the extent of being a key player for Rangers. Was loaned out to Sunderland last season and along with Edmunson, broke the covid rules and looks like there’s no way back for him. I don’t see why they wouldn’t sell him if we wanted. | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 10:54 - Jul 28 with 4442 views | BlueandTruesince82 | Worth to wind up L1 a bit more | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 10:56 - Jul 28 with 4384 views | TomTheWriter | Battling Sunderland and Wigan it seems for his signature. With Burns and Chaplin ours for the foreseeable future, I’m not against this being a loan move. Think the first two would be very suited to the Championship, not sure about Jones. Showed real quality in the first half of his loan spell at Sunderland, but seemed to tail off by the end. Think we do need an extra winger if Burns goes down with an injury, and having Chaplin, Burns, Jones and Dobra sounds very exciting. | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 11:09 - Jul 28 with 4126 views | TRUE_BLUE123 | Not going to complain as we have had a great window. But by all accounts is consistently inconsistent. That being said, if he was a consistent winger he wouldn’t be in league one so, who knows. [Post edited 28 Jul 2021 11:10]
| |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Jordan Jones on 11:14 - Jul 28 with 3998 views | jayessess | If we're only recruiting one more winger can't say this is a particularly inspiring one. | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 11:36 - Jul 28 with 3579 views | TIB | According a Rangers supporting mate he's got serious pace and would do a job for Championship years so here's hoping we get this over the line. | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 11:51 - Jul 28 with 3439 views | itfcjoe | No ITFC interest in him | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 11:53 - Jul 28 with 3394 views | TIB |
Jordan Jones on 11:51 - Jul 28 by itfcjoe | No ITFC interest in him |
Fake news Joe? | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 11:54 - Jul 28 with 3353 views | ElderGrizzly |
Jordan Jones on 10:45 - Jul 28 by Kieran_Knows | He'd be another good signing, although frustrating that it would be a loan. |
Loan would mean we could 'hide' the wages in the loan fee, if we think the SMCP limit is becoming an issue | | | |
Jordan Jones on 11:56 - Jul 28 with 3280 views | PhilTWTD |
Jordan Jones on 11:51 - Jul 28 by itfcjoe | No ITFC interest in him |
Hearing similar. | | | |
Jordan Jones on 12:00 - Jul 28 with 3159 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Jordan Jones on 11:54 - Jul 28 by ElderGrizzly | Loan would mean we could 'hide' the wages in the loan fee, if we think the SMCP limit is becoming an issue |
I thought loan fees counted toward SMCP. Do they not? | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 12:06 - Jul 28 with 3055 views | ElderGrizzly |
Jordan Jones on 12:00 - Jul 28 by Cheltenham_Blue | I thought loan fees counted toward SMCP. Do they not? |
Don't believe so. They are treated like transfer fees, which are exempt | | | |
Jordan Jones on 12:15 - Jul 28 with 2869 views | jayessess |
Jordan Jones on 12:06 - Jul 28 by ElderGrizzly | Don't believe so. They are treated like transfer fees, which are exempt |
The EFL website still has the 2020-21 pre-legal dispute FFP regulations up, but their definition of "salary" for that did include loan fees: "2.7 in respect of Salary Cap Player who is registered at the Club on a Temporary Loan Transfer all amounts referred to in this paragraph 2 and any Loan Fee" https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/efl-rules--regulations/appendix-5---financi [Post edited 28 Jul 2021 12:16]
| |
| |
Jordan Jones on 12:18 - Jul 28 with 2782 views | Parky |
Jordan Jones on 11:56 - Jul 28 by PhilTWTD | Hearing similar. |
Cos’ we’re going to sign Celina, right? | | | |
Jordan Jones on 12:19 - Jul 28 with 2740 views | SitfcB |
Jordan Jones on 11:56 - Jul 28 by PhilTWTD | Hearing similar. |
FLW is horrendous. Don’t think they’ve got anything right with us and their ‘exclusives’. | |
| |
Jordan Jones on 12:21 - Jul 28 with 2681 views | ElderGrizzly |
Jordan Jones on 12:15 - Jul 28 by jayessess | The EFL website still has the 2020-21 pre-legal dispute FFP regulations up, but their definition of "salary" for that did include loan fees: "2.7 in respect of Salary Cap Player who is registered at the Club on a Temporary Loan Transfer all amounts referred to in this paragraph 2 and any Loan Fee" https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/efl-rules--regulations/appendix-5---financi [Post edited 28 Jul 2021 12:16]
|
Apologies then. They must have updated it, as this was always a 'loophole' with loans and why so many used them. Balls... | | | |
Jordan Jones on 12:41 - Jul 28 with 2352 views | PhilTWTD |
Jordan Jones on 12:18 - Jul 28 by Parky | Cos’ we’re going to sign Celina, right? |
Sadly I suspect not. | | | |
Jordan Jones on 12:43 - Jul 28 with 2295 views | Illinoisblue | Literally never heard of him | |
| |
| |