| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:09 - Jan 12 with 10234 views | le2blue |
And he's not travelling with the team to Sunderland because of the bid...wonder who the bid is from. |  | |  |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:15 - Jan 12 with 9983 views | portmanking |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:09 - Jan 12 by le2blue |
And he's not travelling with the team to Sunderland because of the bid...wonder who the bid is from. |
Mama Mia... that wouldn't be because said club is close to an acceptable figure, would it? |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:19 - Jan 12 with 9839 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:15 - Jan 12 by portmanking |
Mama Mia... that wouldn't be because said club is close to an acceptable figure, would it? |
And scared of losing their investment through injury ?
It's got to be us - amongst others I'd suggest (trying to play it down)
I hate transfer windows !!! |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:24 - Jan 12 with 9653 views | ITFC_Josh |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:19 - Jan 12 by Metal_Hacker |
And scared of losing their investment through injury ?
It's got to be us - amongst others I'd suggest (trying to play it down)
I hate transfer windows !!! |
If it was us, wouldn’t it be reported that we’ve made a bid like it was with Broadhead? |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:27 - Jan 12 with 9540 views | Rozz |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:15 - Jan 12 by portmanking |
Mama Mia... that wouldn't be because said club is close to an acceptable figure, would it? |
He was never likely to play a part at Swansea.
As such, I think they'll wait until nearer the end of the window to see who bites. [Post edited 12 Jan 2023 13:27]
|  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:27 - Jan 12 with 9531 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:24 - Jan 12 by ITFC_Josh |
If it was us, wouldn’t it be reported that we’ve made a bid like it was with Broadhead? |
Well with the club who's bid not being mentioned makes me think it could be us ( because of how Ashton and the club now works) along with the fact that the transfer would be very spikey with a considerable fall out from the Plymouth contingent
Who knows it could be anyone really hey .. again ...transfer windows GRRRRR !!
It could even be Plymouth  | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:29 - Jan 12 with 9439 views | LeBlue |
I'm guessing Plymouth. |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:29 - Jan 12 with 9367 views | itfcjoe |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:19 - Jan 12 by Metal_Hacker |
And scared of losing their investment through injury ?
It's got to be us - amongst others I'd suggest (trying to play it down)
I hate transfer windows !!! |
If he plays for them he can't play for anyone but Plymouth this season so won't happen |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:30 - Jan 12 with 9345 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:29 - Jan 12 by LeBlue |
I'm guessing Plymouth. |
Didn't their owner/chief executive (or whoever it was) confirm they'd made several offers for him before he even got recalled? All of which were rejected by Swansea. |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:31 - Jan 12 with 9243 views | SmithersJones |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:15 - Jan 12 by portmanking |
Mama Mia... that wouldn't be because said club is close to an acceptable figure, would it? |
There's no way Swansea are going to play him this soon, unless they plan to keep him (and they've shown no sign of wanting to do that). As soon as he plays one minute for them he can't go anywhere else other than Plymouth. And even if they do plan to send him back to Plymouth it ruins their negotiating hand to take every other club out of the market. | | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:43 - Jan 12 with 8843 views | textbackup |
Who does he take the place of?
I’m not entirely sure on the position he plays… because no chance we’ll pay another £1m + and him not be a starter |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:44 - Jan 12 with 8800 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:43 - Jan 12 by textbackup |
Who does he take the place of?
I’m not entirely sure on the position he plays… because no chance we’ll pay another £1m + and him not be a starter |
No.10, behind the striker.
I suspect he'll be seen as a long term investment, should we be interested/end up signing him. | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:45 - Jan 12 with 8731 views | OsborneOneNil |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:29 - Jan 12 by LeBlue |
I'm guessing Plymouth. |
They've spent their January budget, according to Schuey. |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:46 - Jan 12 with 8663 views | textbackup |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:44 - Jan 12 by Kieran_Knows |
No.10, behind the striker.
I suspect he'll be seen as a long term investment, should we be interested/end up signing him. |
So in reality that means our 2 x 10’s are to be picked out of… Chaplin Whittaker Broadhead Aluko harness
Wouldn’t be a bad situation to be in 👀 [Post edited 12 Jan 2023 13:50]
| |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:47 - Jan 12 with 8661 views | StokieBlue |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:43 - Jan 12 by textbackup |
Who does he take the place of?
I’m not entirely sure on the position he plays… because no chance we’ll pay another £1m + and him not be a starter |
He's 21 and has scored 9 goals and has 7 assists from the 10 position in half a season.
I think he's probably a step up from Edwards, Harness and Aluko and with a higher future ceiling.
I'd still be surprised if we got him though.
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:47 - Jan 12 with 8629 views | Parky |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:43 - Jan 12 by textbackup |
Who does he take the place of?
I’m not entirely sure on the position he plays… because no chance we’ll pay another £1m + and him not be a starter |
If we were to peruse him, I imagine it’ll be seen as an investment. He’s only 22 and off the back of a superb half season. | | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:49 - Jan 12 with 8546 views | suffolkpoker |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:47 - Jan 12 by StokieBlue |
He's 21 and has scored 9 goals and has 7 assists from the 10 position in half a season.
I think he's probably a step up from Edwards, Harness and Aluko and with a higher future ceiling.
I'd still be surprised if we got him though.
SB |
Bit harsh on Harness. He can go missing in some games but he is quality for this league and a step up from Aluko and Edwards imho. |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:50 - Jan 12 with 8496 views | ITFC_Josh |
I just really can’t see it happening, would love to be proved wrong though of course. | | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:51 - Jan 12 with 8449 views | textbackup |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:47 - Jan 12 by StokieBlue |
He's 21 and has scored 9 goals and has 7 assists from the 10 position in half a season.
I think he's probably a step up from Edwards, Harness and Aluko and with a higher future ceiling.
I'd still be surprised if we got him though.
SB |
Me too, be seriously difficult keeping that many players happy | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:51 - Jan 12 with 8450 views | StokieBlue |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:49 - Jan 12 by suffolkpoker |
Bit harsh on Harness. He can go missing in some games but he is quality for this league and a step up from Aluko and Edwards imho. |
That's fair, still think he's a step down from Whittaker though.
We also need to be thinking about the league above, is harness quality for that league or is someone like whittaker a higher ceiling?
As I said, I'd be surprised if we got him.
SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:52 - Jan 12 with 8332 views | suffolkpoker |
I think we knew we wasnt going to get him and thats why we brought in Hirst and Broadhead. | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:04 - Jan 12 with 7974 views | homer_123 |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:51 - Jan 12 by StokieBlue |
That's fair, still think he's a step down from Whittaker though.
We also need to be thinking about the league above, is harness quality for that league or is someone like whittaker a higher ceiling?
As I said, I'd be surprised if we got him.
SB |
Whittaker is, like Broady, far more with a view to Championship football but also re-sale value.
I've an inkling now that we might see 2 more come in before the end of the window.  |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:05 - Jan 12 with 7888 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:04 - Jan 12 by homer_123 |
Whittaker is, like Broady, far more with a view to Championship football but also re-sale value.
I've an inkling now that we might see 2 more come in before the end of the window. |
Two more ?
Whittaker and .......... | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:06 - Jan 12 with 7869 views | itfcjoe |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:51 - Jan 12 by StokieBlue |
That's fair, still think he's a step down from Whittaker though.
We also need to be thinking about the league above, is harness quality for that league or is someone like whittaker a higher ceiling?
As I said, I'd be surprised if we got him.
SB |
It's a tough one with Whittaker as does feel like he has that higher ceiling because of output, but when I watch him I think he may struggle in the Championship as doesn't seem to have that much to his game | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:09 - Jan 12 with 7751 views | portmanking |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:06 - Jan 12 by itfcjoe |
It's a tough one with Whittaker as does feel like he has that higher ceiling because of output, but when I watch him I think he may struggle in the Championship as doesn't seem to have that much to his game |
I feel the same when I watch Harness though, to be honest. For all Marcus' endeavour, his technical attributes won't match up with Championship football IMO. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
