| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:09 - Jan 12 with 2875 views | homer_123 |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:06 - Jan 12 by itfcjoe |
It's a tough one with Whittaker as does feel like he has that higher ceiling because of output, but when I watch him I think he may struggle in the Championship as doesn't seem to have that much to his game |
Slightly different football up in the Championship though, I can see him developing and progressing.
Also, I feel the way we play really suits him. He would be a major step up on Edwards, Harness and an ageing Aluko - not that I have an issue with any of those. |  |
|  |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:10 - Jan 12 with 2849 views | homer_123 |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:05 - Jan 12 by Metal_Hacker |
Two more ?
Whittaker and .......... |
Let's just say ArnieMs Xmas's would come all at once. | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:15 - Jan 12 with 2751 views | hype313 |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:09 - Jan 12 by homer_123 |
Slightly different football up in the Championship though, I can see him developing and progressing.
Also, I feel the way we play really suits him. He would be a major step up on Edwards, Harness and an ageing Aluko - not that I have an issue with any of those. |
Phil's been notably quiet on this thread, so putting two and two together, I reckon it was our bid. |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:16 - Jan 12 with 2723 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:06 - Jan 12 by itfcjoe |
It's a tough one with Whittaker as does feel like he has that higher ceiling because of output, but when I watch him I think he may struggle in the Championship as doesn't seem to have that much to his game |
I'd gladly take the fact he" hasn't got much to his game " if it got us up this season
Next season is just that ...the investment into Whittaker would be just that wouldn't it ?
That said I believe he'd be a decent Champ player to be honest |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:23 - Jan 12 with 2602 views | homer_123 |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:15 - Jan 12 by hype313 |
Phil's been notably quiet on this thread, so putting two and two together, I reckon it was our bid. |
No secret we are interested. | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:24 - Jan 12 with 2590 views | BigCommon |
Most likely Plymouth with derisary offer, to appease the fans.. After window, it'll be "We did all we could" |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:29 - Jan 12 with 2508 views | homer_123 |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:51 - Jan 12 by textbackup |
Me too, be seriously difficult keeping that many players happy |
We are limited to extent on squad size, so one or two might head out the door, perm or loan. | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:29 - Jan 12 with 2491 views | textbackup |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:09 - Jan 12 by portmanking |
I feel the same when I watch Harness though, to be honest. For all Marcus' endeavour, his technical attributes won't match up with Championship football IMO. |
Yeah I’m a bit like that with him too |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:32 - Jan 12 with 2450 views | PhilTWTD |
Am told the turned down bid wasn't Town. |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:36 - Jan 12 with 2372 views | itfcjoe |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:16 - Jan 12 by Metal_Hacker |
I'd gladly take the fact he" hasn't got much to his game " if it got us up this season
Next season is just that ...the investment into Whittaker would be just that wouldn't it ?
That said I believe he'd be a decent Champ player to be honest |
If you sign him for £1.5m and you go up it is well worth it, if he doesn't cut it at Champ level he'll still retain nearly all that value anyway so certainly wouldn't be averse to signing him even if have a couple of reservations re how he plays at level above |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:47 - Jan 12 with 2241 views | PhilTWTD |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:32 - Jan 12 by PhilTWTD |
Am told the turned down bid wasn't Town. |
And before anyone asks, I don't know who it's from. | | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:48 - Jan 12 with 2213 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:47 - Jan 12 by PhilTWTD |
And before anyone asks, I don't know who it's from. |
Hopefully not Weds !!! | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:48 - Jan 12 with 2218 views | ITFCBlues |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:47 - Jan 12 by PhilTWTD |
And before anyone asks, I don't know who it's from. |
Are we still interested? I wonder if there's actually any bid or its just to try and force interested sides hands. |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:50 - Jan 12 with 2182 views | braveblue |
He doesn’t seem to want to go anywhere but Plymouth. Can’t see is accepting the attitude nor adding to our growing list of forwards. |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:51 - Jan 12 with 2181 views | hype313 |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:32 - Jan 12 by PhilTWTD |
Am told the turned down bid wasn't Town. |
I get the impression since Gamechanger took over that as much as they won't be put over a barrel for fees, they won't waste peoples time with derisory offers either. | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:51 - Jan 12 with 2169 views | billlm |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 13:29 - Jan 12 by LeBlue |
I'm guessing Plymouth. |
That's where my money is Plymouth,
He's never coming here, |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:52 - Jan 12 with 2143 views | Illinoisblue |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:48 - Jan 12 by Metal_Hacker |
Hopefully not Weds !!! |
Wouldn’t that be a plot twist |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:53 - Jan 12 with 2125 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:52 - Jan 12 by Illinoisblue |
Wouldn’t that be a plot twist |
Wouldn't it just !!!
I'll be speaking to my Weds supporting "mates" tonight at 5 a side | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:54 - Jan 12 with 2092 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:51 - Jan 12 by billlm |
That's where my money is Plymouth,
He's never coming here, |
The only way he goes back there is on loan, and Swansea have recalled him to sell him. So unless they get to the last couple of days and he's not been sold, I can't imagine he'll end up back at Plymouth. |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:00 - Jan 12 with 1972 views | J2BLUE |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:54 - Jan 12 by Kieran_Knows |
The only way he goes back there is on loan, and Swansea have recalled him to sell him. So unless they get to the last couple of days and he's not been sold, I can't imagine he'll end up back at Plymouth. |
Why don't you think they can buy him? |  |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:07 - Jan 12 with 1883 views | billlm |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:54 - Jan 12 by Kieran_Knows |
The only way he goes back there is on loan, and Swansea have recalled him to sell him. So unless they get to the last couple of days and he's not been sold, I can't imagine he'll end up back at Plymouth. |
Cheers mate, | | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:09 - Jan 12 with 1868 views | bluefunk |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 14:06 - Jan 12 by itfcjoe |
It's a tough one with Whittaker as does feel like he has that higher ceiling because of output, but when I watch him I think he may struggle in the Championship as doesn't seem to have that much to his game |
I think many are forgetting that Whittaker hasn’t got a particularly track record before this season, and Swansea, who know him well, didn’t bring him back to play him. This looks to me like them selling while his value is at its highest, because he won’t keep this going. We’ve all seen players who hit a streak of form in a specific environment but never go on to repeat that elsewhere - we have plenty of ability in the no 10 options we have, we don’t need Whittaker and I doubt he’d come here anyway. |  | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:10 - Jan 12 with 1853 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:00 - Jan 12 by J2BLUE |
Why don't you think they can buy him? |
Take from Plymouth statement when he was recalled ...
'Keen to ensure every avenue was explored in retaining an integral member of the Greens’ high-flying squad, Argyle made several proposals to Swansea City, including amending the financial terms of the loan deal, as well as enquiring about a permanent transfer.'
I would suggest that means they got nowhere near Swansea's valuation for him. | |
| |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:33 - Jan 12 with 1649 views | Exiled2Surrey |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:10 - Jan 12 by Kieran_Knows |
Take from Plymouth statement when he was recalled ...
'Keen to ensure every avenue was explored in retaining an integral member of the Greens’ high-flying squad, Argyle made several proposals to Swansea City, including amending the financial terms of the loan deal, as well as enquiring about a permanent transfer.'
I would suggest that means they got nowhere near Swansea's valuation for him. |
So strictly speaking they could have been the one bid referred to - don’t think anyone said when that bid was made…. What we are therefore left to conclude is that there are no offers for MW | | | |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:42 - Jan 12 with 1598 views | Vegtablue |
| Whittaker Bid rejected on 15:33 - Jan 12 by Exiled2Surrey |
So strictly speaking they could have been the one bid referred to - don’t think anyone said when that bid was made…. What we are therefore left to conclude is that there are no offers for MW |
Does feel more likely they are revealing a bid made since his recall! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
