| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 16:09 - Nov 22 with 3229 views | PacittiJohn |
that only leaves Nunez. Puzzling. |  | | |  |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:10 - Nov 22 with 2099 views | BouncebackIpswich |
Would be nice for one of the local journos to finally ask McKenna about this. It's bizarre. Rest of the team is working really well |  |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:11 - Nov 22 with 2094 views | FrimleyBlue |
I just don't get why KM can not see that akpom does not and will not work in our version of the 10. The same reason Sammy S doesn't.
Nunez out creates both by so much its unreal. |  |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:17 - Nov 22 with 2019 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:11 - Nov 22 by FrimleyBlue |
I just don't get why KM can not see that akpom does not and will not work in our version of the 10. The same reason Sammy S doesn't.
Nunez out creates both by so much its unreal. |
I think McKenna just understands that some time it takes time. Both of them ARE number 10s. Things need to click in to place. Cov fans were saying similar stuff about Thomas Asante last season | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:19 - Nov 22 with 1992 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:17 - Nov 22 by Nutkins_Return |
I think McKenna just understands that some time it takes time. Both of them ARE number 10s. Things need to click in to place. Cov fans were saying similar stuff about Thomas Asante last season |
No good if not promoted as hell be back with his parent club tho. | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:29 - Nov 22 with 1943 views | blueoutlook |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:17 - Nov 22 by Nutkins_Return |
I think McKenna just understands that some time it takes time. Both of them ARE number 10s. Things need to click in to place. Cov fans were saying similar stuff about Thomas Asante last season |
They really aren’t no 10 s. |  | | |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:30 - Nov 22 with 1924 views | Len_Brennan |
Cajuste could do a job there too. | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 (n/t) on 16:32 - Nov 22 with 1914 views | PacittiJohn |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:30 - Nov 22 by Len_Brennan |
Cajuste could do a job there too. |
| | | |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:33 - Nov 22 with 1880 views | PacittiJohn |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:30 - Nov 22 by Len_Brennan |
Cajuste could do a job there too. |
Yes, Cajuste would be a good option. Think he could shine there. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:35 - Nov 22 with 1849 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:17 - Nov 22 by Nutkins_Return |
I think McKenna just understands that some time it takes time. Both of them ARE number 10s. Things need to click in to place. Cov fans were saying similar stuff about Thomas Asante last season |
Rose tinted view I feel |  | | |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:57 - Nov 22 with 1747 views | HighgateBlue |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:11 - Nov 22 by FrimleyBlue |
I just don't get why KM can not see that akpom does not and will not work in our version of the 10. The same reason Sammy S doesn't.
Nunez out creates both by so much its unreal. |
Well I agree, but I'm not sure he's good enough to do anything else in our system either. That totally free header he had in the box, and his general record of absolutely no goals for us whatsoever doesn't scream number 9. I'd rather play Greaves or Kipre there. Their shots at least go on target much more frequently. |  | | |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:04 - Nov 22 with 1708 views | Z765765 |
Chaplin is. But oh, he’s out on loan | | | |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:08 - Nov 22 with 1683 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:04 - Nov 22 by Z765765 |
Chaplin is. But oh, he’s out on loan |
Out on loan paying on the wing apparently. What are we all missing? |  |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:09 - Nov 22 with 1677 views | Ryorry |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 16:57 - Nov 22 by HighgateBlue |
Well I agree, but I'm not sure he's good enough to do anything else in our system either. That totally free header he had in the box, and his general record of absolutely no goals for us whatsoever doesn't scream number 9. I'd rather play Greaves or Kipre there. Their shots at least go on target much more frequently. |
I don't know how many chances he's had as a 9 as I'm not able to watch games, but from what I've seen on videos of his previous goals, he's far, far more a 9 than a 10. |  |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:16 - Nov 22 with 1636 views | GavTWTD |
When Wes returns Walle Egeli could go central. |  |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:17 - Nov 22 with 1627 views | NthQldITFC |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:08 - Nov 22 by Swansea_Blue |
Out on loan paying on the wing apparently. What are we all missing? |
An Akpom-sized Conor Chaplin. |  |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:18 - Nov 22 with 1615 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:16 - Nov 22 by GavTWTD |
When Wes returns Walle Egeli could go central. |
Could is the interesting word
Cajuste could play 10
Humphreys could play 10
Nunez could play 10 | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:18 - Nov 22 with 1618 views | Trequartista |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:16 - Nov 22 by GavTWTD |
When Wes returns Walle Egeli could go central. |
Why do we have to wait until Wes returns, put Clarke on the right. |  |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:23 - Nov 22 with 1581 views | FoghornGleghorn |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:17 - Nov 22 by NthQldITFC |
An Akpom-sized Conor Chaplin. |
A Conor Chaplin-sized Conor Chaplin did well enough last time out. | | | |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:24 - Nov 22 with 1563 views | GavTWTD |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:18 - Nov 22 by FrimleyBlue |
Could is the interesting word
Cajuste could play 10
Humphreys could play 10
Nunez could play 10 |
Both McKenna and Sindre thinks his longer term position is central which is why I suggested it but it might be tried sooner. Nunez is good there but in this 100 games in 20 days we probably need him to be in CM. I do fancy seeing Cajuste there also. Its a problem position for us and one of the most important for the way we play. | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 18:06 - Nov 22 with 1450 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:24 - Nov 22 by GavTWTD |
Both McKenna and Sindre thinks his longer term position is central which is why I suggested it but it might be tried sooner. Nunez is good there but in this 100 games in 20 days we probably need him to be in CM. I do fancy seeing Cajuste there also. Its a problem position for us and one of the most important for the way we play. |
Personality if its not nunez then id rather we start egeli there and then we could even utilise johnson right who never let us down in that role until wes is back.
I just can't stand the akpom experiment. It does not work. | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 18:45 - Nov 22 with 1370 views | Herbivore |
This is going to blow your mind, but Nunez isn't a number 10 either. In fact he's less of a number 10 than the other two. |  |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 18:50 - Nov 22 with 1341 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 18:45 - Nov 22 by Herbivore |
This is going to blow your mind, but Nunez isn't a number 10 either. In fact he's less of a number 10 than the other two. |
Yet recently akpom created 1 chance in 79 minutes as the 10
Nunez created 2 inside 11 minutes | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 18:50 - Nov 22 with 1342 views | NthQldITFC |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 17:23 - Nov 22 by FoghornGleghorn |
A Conor Chaplin-sized Conor Chaplin did well enough last time out. |
Yes, he'd be fine for us and would knit the team together now, which is a worthy argument for it, but we need a PL sized player developed to play there. If we don't do it now we'd have to buy 1/2 players for that role if we get promoted and it's better to have at least one of them ready acclimatised.
I suspect it will be Sindre in there come spring time, and a new right winger. | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 18:55 - Nov 22 with 1312 views | Herbivore |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 10 on 18:50 - Nov 22 by FrimleyBlue |
Yet recently akpom created 1 chance in 79 minutes as the 10
Nunez created 2 inside 11 minutes |
Oh okay, sorry mate, I must be wrong because of one game of football. | |
| |
| Akpom is not a No 10, Szmodics is not a No 1 i on 18:56 - Nov 22 with 1307 views | southnorfolkblue |
Both were golden boot winners playing in the 10 role.
The more puzzling issue is why it’s not working for them here | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
