| Is this because.... 10:13 - Feb 29 with 44173 views | hampstead_blue |
....a middle aged white, privileged, probably Oxbridge man in a safe job for life cannot accept working for a very determined and strong woman?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-51687287
She has clearly taken away his power base and he does not like it one bit.
|  |
| Assumption is to make an ass out of you and me.
Those who assume they know you, when they don't are just guessing.
Those who assume and insist they know are daft and in denial.
Those who assume, insist, and deny the truth are plain stupid.
Those who assume, insist, deny the truth and tell YOU they know you (when they don't) have an IQ in the range of 35-49.
| | Poll: | Best Blackpool goal |
| |  |
| Is this because.... on 15:14 - Mar 4 with 2520 views | Darth_Koont |
| Is this because.... on 14:59 - Mar 4 by GlasgowBlue |
You're one of them. You accused the staffers, one of whom contemplated suicide, of lying on this very board. [Post edited 4 Mar 2020 15:04]
|
I accused the JLM members of being politically active lobbyists and not being honest about that.
I apologise for "bullying" them and you with the truth. |  |
| |
| Is this because.... on 15:16 - Mar 4 with 2512 views | Darth_Koont |
| Is this because.... on 15:12 - Mar 4 by GlasgowBlue |
In this thread I have said that......
"She should resign whilst an investigation is carried out with regards to the bullying"
"she should never have been given another job in cabinet after she was caught having unauthorised meetings with members of a foreign government"
"is a deeply unpleasant woman and she has no place in government"
You'd have to be dome sort of halfwit to take from that that I have desperately tried to defend her.
What I have done is exposed the hypocrisy of both people on the right and people on the left . |
No, it's the usual Glassers' whataboutery.
Let's be honest. | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 15:27 - Mar 4 with 2476 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Is this because.... on 15:14 - Mar 4 by Darth_Koont |
I accused the JLM members of being politically active lobbyists and not being honest about that.
I apologise for "bullying" them and you with the truth. |
No. You accused the staffers of lying.
SB: So lets be clear about this.
You are calling the members of the dispute team, people who were there and know more than you about the subject liars?
DK: I don't know. Maybe? Nothing surprises me any more.
I'll add your name to the hypocrite list alongside Harry and bid you good day. |  |
| |
| Is this because.... on 15:31 - Mar 4 with 2465 views | HARRY10 |
| Is this because.... on 15:16 - Mar 4 by Darth_Koont |
No, it's the usual Glassers' whataboutery.
Let's be honest. |
"What I have done is exposed the hypocrisy of both people on the right and people on the left . "
No, what you have done is tried to portray this as a 'plague on both house'.
A pretty absurd position, were it not coming from you - as it would assume that any comment from the BBC about Prince Andrew's conduct was hypocricy given Savile's activities.
MPs of all parties have duty to hold the government to account. Something that is not encumbent upon them with regard to another party.
So we are left with what was your motivativation for you rematk and I can only conclude with the above thought, it is 'whataboutery' |  | | |
| Is this because.... on 15:34 - Mar 4 with 2462 views | Darth_Koont |
| Is this because.... on 15:27 - Mar 4 by GlasgowBlue |
No. You accused the staffers of lying.
SB: So lets be clear about this.
You are calling the members of the dispute team, people who were there and know more than you about the subject liars?
DK: I don't know. Maybe? Nothing surprises me any more.
I'll add your name to the hypocrite list alongside Harry and bid you good day. |
As I've said, they aren't exactly honest about who and what they represent as JLM members.
I think I'm allowed some scepticism given the extent of the smeary sh!thousery on show and their fanatical desire to discredit the Labour Party since 2015.
Why do you think any of that relates to civil servants? If you're going to muddy the waters I'd like to see your evidence. Just like with your compadres who want to equate (and thus dismiss this) with the abuse of Diane Abbott. | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 15:36 - Mar 4 with 2458 views | Darth_Koont |
| Is this because.... on 15:31 - Mar 4 by HARRY10 |
"What I have done is exposed the hypocrisy of both people on the right and people on the left . "
No, what you have done is tried to portray this as a 'plague on both house'.
A pretty absurd position, were it not coming from you - as it would assume that any comment from the BBC about Prince Andrew's conduct was hypocricy given Savile's activities.
MPs of all parties have duty to hold the government to account. Something that is not encumbent upon them with regard to another party.
So we are left with what was your motivativation for you rematk and I can only conclude with the above thought, it is 'whataboutery' |
GB's as transparent as crotchless knickers. | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 15:47 - Mar 4 with 2440 views | HARRY10 |
| Is this because.... on 15:34 - Mar 4 by Darth_Koont |
As I've said, they aren't exactly honest about who and what they represent as JLM members.
I think I'm allowed some scepticism given the extent of the smeary sh!thousery on show and their fanatical desire to discredit the Labour Party since 2015.
Why do you think any of that relates to civil servants? If you're going to muddy the waters I'd like to see your evidence. Just like with your compadres who want to equate (and thus dismiss this) with the abuse of Diane Abbott. |
So because I point out the inn=accuracies of the OP and other supporting posts I am a hypocrite ?
How bizarre. Something that does bring into question how these righties minds work.
Should any German who questions the treatment of muslims in Burma or China now be thought a hypocrite ?
Does it mean that anyone in Suffolk who questions the acts of a serial killer is a hypocrite because of Steve Wight ?
Maybe it's this same warped 'logic' that had them thinking that brexit was not going to be a massive sh itshow. | | | |
| Is this because.... on 15:49 - Mar 4 with 2436 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Is this because.... on 15:16 - Mar 4 by Darth_Koont |
No, it's the usual Glassers' whataboutery.
Let's be honest. |
Let's be honest. If you condemn Tory bullying but trivialise, dismiss or defend Labour bullying then you don't care about bullying. You care about party politics. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Is this because.... on 15:56 - Mar 4 with 2425 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Is this because.... on 15:47 - Mar 4 by HARRY10 |
So because I point out the inn=accuracies of the OP and other supporting posts I am a hypocrite ?
How bizarre. Something that does bring into question how these righties minds work.
Should any German who questions the treatment of muslims in Burma or China now be thought a hypocrite ?
Does it mean that anyone in Suffolk who questions the acts of a serial killer is a hypocrite because of Steve Wight ?
Maybe it's this same warped 'logic' that had them thinking that brexit was not going to be a massive sh itshow. |
Is this because.... by GlasgowBlue 4 Mar 2020 15:49Let's be honest. If you condemn Tory bullying but trivialise, dismiss or defend Labour bullying then you don't care about bullying. You care about party politics.
| |
| |
| Is this because.... on 16:10 - Mar 4 with 2408 views | Darth_Koont |
| Is this because.... on 15:49 - Mar 4 by GlasgowBlue |
Let's be honest. If you condemn Tory bullying but trivialise, dismiss or defend Labour bullying then you don't care about bullying. You care about party politics. |
Yawn.
That's top-level smudging. Make your case with the actual detailed information or GTF. | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 16:16 - Mar 4 with 2398 views | HARRY10 |
| Is this because.... on 15:49 - Mar 4 by GlasgowBlue |
Let's be honest. If you condemn Tory bullying but trivialise, dismiss or defend Labour bullying then you don't care about bullying. You care about party politics. |
Back again, so soon
You are not very good at this are you ?''I should stop keep digging if I were you as it is not about supposed Labour bullying it is about a concern with what our government is doing.
I have no connection nor have any support for the Labour party so why am I a hypocrite for raisong concerns about this matter, and in doing so pointing out the inaccuracies of the OP and supporting posts ? | | | |
| Is this because.... on 18:31 - Mar 4 with 2369 views | GaryCooper |
| Is this because.... on 19:18 - Mar 3 by footers |
If he was to blame for the Windrush scandal then the government's inquiry would have made it untenable for him to stay on. As it happened, it didn't.
Why you're bending over backwards over this and Abbott is really odd.
This is the UK, we don't just sack civil servants because they have a different view. |
You may wish to read this, the inquiry has not yet been published so your post is wholly wrong.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/03/windrush-bullying-home-off
If a tory had behaved as Abbott has behaved, with the blatant racism and incompetence then you and troop would have been all over it, it is blinkered and madly tribal. [Post edited 4 Mar 2020 18:39]
|  | | |
| Is this because.... on 18:55 - Mar 4 with 2354 views | GlasgowBlue |
Yeah but getting Priti Patel out of government trumps the Windrush victims init.
I's like "We support the Palestinians"
"OK. What about the 160,000 Palestinian refugees in Yarmouk who were bombed by Assad"?
"No we don't mean those Palestinians"
This thread is full of rank hypocrites who defended/excused/trivialised the bullying of Labour staffers complaining about the leader's interference in the antisemitism process and turned the other way when Bercow's bullying was exposed.
The Windrush victims, like the Palestinians are just pawns in their political games. [Post edited 4 Mar 2020 18:57]
| |
| |
| Is this because.... on 19:07 - Mar 4 with 2341 views | footers |
So you have evidence of his wrongdoing over Windrush? You imply as much so maybe you'd be helpful enough to supply information to the inquiry x |  |
| |
| Is this because.... on 19:10 - Mar 4 with 2339 views | footers |
| Is this because.... on 18:55 - Mar 4 by GlasgowBlue |
Yeah but getting Priti Patel out of government trumps the Windrush victims init.
I's like "We support the Palestinians"
"OK. What about the 160,000 Palestinian refugees in Yarmouk who were bombed by Assad"?
"No we don't mean those Palestinians"
This thread is full of rank hypocrites who defended/excused/trivialised the bullying of Labour staffers complaining about the leader's interference in the antisemitism process and turned the other way when Bercow's bullying was exposed.
The Windrush victims, like the Palestinians are just pawns in their political games. [Post edited 4 Mar 2020 18:57]
|
Says a not-so-closeted Tory pretending to be right-on now that he's 'unaffiliated'.
Eh, gibbers, any word on your mates at the JC and being sued for libel and "significantly misleading articles" over Labour antisemitism? The Jewish population were just pawns in your disgusting little game.
But then again you were blind to Tory prejudice for decades while you were a member. How convenient! | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 19:36 - Mar 4 with 2304 views | HARRY10 |
you get more desperate (and silly) by the day
posts on here have been put up in response to a now shown to be false claim by the OP
the tribalism has been from you righties who trying to defend the odious Patel and her behaviour have dragged in various Labour MP's, and even your absurd guff about Abbott's supposed racism
the thread was started with the claim that it was not Patel at fault but the civil servant - yet within days it has been shown who is to blame so stop making an ass of yourself by imagining yours and others whataboutery deflects from that.... it doesn't | | | |
| Is this because.... on 19:51 - Mar 4 with 2291 views | Trequartista |
When Gordon Ramsay shouts and swears, the consensus is that it is required to knock the restauranteurs into shape, and they thank him later. What a contrast. [Post edited 4 Mar 2020 19:52]
|  |
| |
| Is this because.... on 19:55 - Mar 4 with 2280 views | footers |
| Is this because.... on 19:51 - Mar 4 by Trequartista |
When Gordon Ramsay shouts and swears, the consensus is that it is required to knock the restauranteurs into shape, and they thank him later. What a contrast. [Post edited 4 Mar 2020 19:52]
|
From sh1t restaurants paraded on telly to the British government. Yeah, totally the same thing. | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 19:59 - Mar 4 with 2272 views | Trequartista |
| Is this because.... on 19:55 - Mar 4 by footers |
From sh1t restaurants paraded on telly to the British government. Yeah, totally the same thing. |
Oh hello the man who couldn't count is back. Er, no they are not the same, but they have a similarity that makes an interesting comparison. | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 20:02 - Mar 4 with 2265 views | SpruceMoose |
| Is this because.... on 19:59 - Mar 4 by Trequartista |
Oh hello the man who couldn't count is back. Er, no they are not the same, but they have a similarity that makes an interesting comparison. |
There is literally nothing interesting about that comparison. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Is this because.... on 20:03 - Mar 4 with 2261 views | vapour_trail |
| Is this because.... on 19:59 - Mar 4 by Trequartista |
Oh hello the man who couldn't count is back. Er, no they are not the same, but they have a similarity that makes an interesting comparison. |
So what you’re saying is the same people who enjoy programmes about Gordon Ramsey, are calling Priti Patel a bully.
The exact same cohort of people?
You’ve lost the plot on here of late mate. |  |
| |
| Is this because.... on 20:05 - Mar 4 with 2255 views | footers |
| Is this because.... on 19:59 - Mar 4 by Trequartista |
Oh hello the man who couldn't count is back. Er, no they are not the same, but they have a similarity that makes an interesting comparison. |
I'll wait for your next decade to start... in 2021.
 | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 20:05 - Mar 4 with 2254 views | SpruceMoose |
| Is this because.... on 20:03 - Mar 4 by vapour_trail |
So what you’re saying is the same people who enjoy programmes about Gordon Ramsey, are calling Priti Patel a bully.
The exact same cohort of people?
You’ve lost the plot on here of late mate. |
It started with Hampstead, and now it's spread to Trekkie. It's spreading like wildfire. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Is this because.... on 20:07 - Mar 4 with 2242 views | Trequartista |
| Is this because.... on 20:03 - Mar 4 by vapour_trail |
So what you’re saying is the same people who enjoy programmes about Gordon Ramsey, are calling Priti Patel a bully.
The exact same cohort of people?
You’ve lost the plot on here of late mate. |
No i'm haven't specified any particular group of people, it's just an interesting comparison of two totally different reactions to two similar things. Should we be praising Patel for doing a Ramsay and or should Ramsay be taken off the air for constant bullying? | |
| |
| Is this because.... on 20:08 - Mar 4 with 2228 views | vapour_trail |
| Is this because.... on 20:07 - Mar 4 by Trequartista |
No i'm haven't specified any particular group of people, it's just an interesting comparison of two totally different reactions to two similar things. Should we be praising Patel for doing a Ramsay and or should Ramsay be taken off the air for constant bullying? |
I think you’re tying yourself up in knots. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
