Hypothetical question to all? 18:36 - May 18 with 1251 views | JoHnNnY | Who actually would rather have Harry Redknapp as owner to Evans? | |
| | |
Hypothetical question to all? on 18:40 - May 18 with 1233 views | Chutney | No thanks. I would like Harry as manager if he fancied one last crack at a job. It would require ME loosening the purse strings a little, while keeping him sufficiently in check to maintain the longer term sustainability of the club. He would certainly get a tune out of our squad next season that's for sure. | | | |
Hypothetical question to all? on 18:41 - May 18 with 1228 views | TractorWood | Evans because he's worth £750m. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 18:42 - May 18 with 1212 views | footers |
Hypothetical question to all? on 18:41 - May 18 by TractorWood | Evans because he's worth £750m. |
But thanks to some creative accounting, so is 'Arry. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 18:43 - May 18 with 1210 views | SpruceMoose |
Hypothetical question to all? on 18:42 - May 18 by footers | But thanks to some creative accounting, so is 'Arry. |
Well, his dog is. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 23:56 - May 18 with 1094 views | patrickswell | It makes me uneasy, but Evans has been such a disaster across his time here, I would be prepared to accept just to get some fresh thinking at boardroom level and at least Redknapp would be here and visible, rather than waffling on from afar about a vision that seems to be propelling us to National League South. | | | |
Hypothetical question to all? on 08:05 - May 19 with 984 views | WeWereZombies | I think I would rather have Nick Leeson as owner than Redknapp. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 08:06 - May 19 with 981 views | GeoffSentence |
Hypothetical question to all? on 18:42 - May 18 by footers | But thanks to some creative accounting, so is 'Arry. |
Harry is potless. We need Rosie as the owner of our club. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 08:13 - May 19 with 974 views | Chrisd | It’s got to be ME, even though we are slowly going backwards as a club under his leadership. I like Harry, but he seems to leave most clubs in a financial mess, although thinking about it we’re not that great in that area either. I might be changing my mind. [Post edited 19 May 2020 8:17]
| |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Hypothetical question to all? on 08:20 - May 19 with 957 views | Plums | I’d rather have Harry Hill TBH. Redknapp’s departure tends to leave clubs in a hole and that’s as manager, goodness knows what wreckage he’d leave in the boardroom. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 09:33 - May 19 with 903 views | WeWereZombies |
Hypothetical question to all? on 08:20 - May 19 by Plums | I’d rather have Harry Hill TBH. Redknapp’s departure tends to leave clubs in a hole and that’s as manager, goodness knows what wreckage he’d leave in the boardroom. |
There's only one way to sort this out... | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 09:33 - May 19 with 902 views | Mullet | I'd rather burn the club down in every sense and never speak of it again. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 09:40 - May 19 with 895 views | ITFC_Forever |
Hypothetical question to all? on 08:13 - May 19 by Chrisd | It’s got to be ME, even though we are slowly going backwards as a club under his leadership. I like Harry, but he seems to leave most clubs in a financial mess, although thinking about it we’re not that great in that area either. I might be changing my mind. [Post edited 19 May 2020 8:17]
|
Tottenham weren't in a mess when he left. Portsmouth were, but that's because of the owners and the various disputes that were going on at the time, not just Harry. They had a net transfer income of something like +£80m and still ended up in trouble. Certainly he (and Mark Hughes) left a massive financial legacy at QPR that they are yet to recover from. To an extent, he is partly at fault for the situation of Birmingham, but again, the owners have proven to be far more culpable. Harry isn't entirely blameless, but to pin all these on him is not fair. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 09:54 - May 19 with 883 views | Libero | Ugh, even just the question makes me sad. Oh how I dream of supporter ownership... | | | |
Hypothetical question to all? on 09:56 - May 19 with 877 views | GeoffSentence |
Hypothetical question to all? on 09:40 - May 19 by ITFC_Forever | Tottenham weren't in a mess when he left. Portsmouth were, but that's because of the owners and the various disputes that were going on at the time, not just Harry. They had a net transfer income of something like +£80m and still ended up in trouble. Certainly he (and Mark Hughes) left a massive financial legacy at QPR that they are yet to recover from. To an extent, he is partly at fault for the situation of Birmingham, but again, the owners have proven to be far more culpable. Harry isn't entirely blameless, but to pin all these on him is not fair. |
You can add Southampton to 'Arry's list of shame. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 10:02 - May 19 with 866 views | Mullet |
Hypothetical question to all? on 09:40 - May 19 by ITFC_Forever | Tottenham weren't in a mess when he left. Portsmouth were, but that's because of the owners and the various disputes that were going on at the time, not just Harry. They had a net transfer income of something like +£80m and still ended up in trouble. Certainly he (and Mark Hughes) left a massive financial legacy at QPR that they are yet to recover from. To an extent, he is partly at fault for the situation of Birmingham, but again, the owners have proven to be far more culpable. Harry isn't entirely blameless, but to pin all these on him is not fair. |
I'd say Spurs are the outlier because they are a bigger club, who relatively speaking he wasn't allowed to run riot with the finances. He is the common factor at all these clubs, and even when talking about Frank brazenly sits there and says it's all about spending. Coaching, management etc. are all left to everyone else under him, he merely talks a good game, butters the right people up and pushes his massive ego into the spotlight when it goes well before sodding off. He's possibly the worst thing to happen to English football if not the embodiment of it all. The fact he's managed to help **** us up so badly just by picking up the phone and golf bag says it all. | |
| |
Hypothetical question to all? on 10:10 - May 19 with 857 views | WeWereZombies |
Hypothetical question to all? on 10:02 - May 19 by Mullet | I'd say Spurs are the outlier because they are a bigger club, who relatively speaking he wasn't allowed to run riot with the finances. He is the common factor at all these clubs, and even when talking about Frank brazenly sits there and says it's all about spending. Coaching, management etc. are all left to everyone else under him, he merely talks a good game, butters the right people up and pushes his massive ego into the spotlight when it goes well before sodding off. He's possibly the worst thing to happen to English football if not the embodiment of it all. The fact he's managed to help **** us up so badly just by picking up the phone and golf bag says it all. |
'he merely talks a good game, butters the right people up and pushes his massive ego into the spotlight when it goes well before sodding off' Reminds me of one or two in the political sphere, whilst it is true that Johnson has yet to sod off the Nigel F pattern does resemble the Harry R one. | |
| |
| |