Tomorrow's line up 10:47 - Nov 27 with 1993 views | Wallingford_Boy | Holy Donacien Woolfie Nsiala Ward Dozzell Lankester Huws Bennetts Norwood Jackson Yes I know he won't drop Chambo! | |
| | |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:49 - Nov 27 with 1451 views | Herbivore | Why would anyone drop Chambo ffs? Especially for Donacien! | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 with 1437 views | clive_baker | That's absolutely hideous. I would go 4-4-fecking-2: Holy Chambers Woolf McGuinnes Ward Lankester Dozzell McGavin Judge Norwood Jackson | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 with 1432 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:49 - Nov 27 by Herbivore | Why would anyone drop Chambo ffs? Especially for Donacien! |
I will tell you why. I thought Donacian was excellent against Portsmouth, offered a real attacking threat plus pace coming back. Chambers had a shocker against Hull (yes I know they all did) and whilst he can get away with it against the likes of Shrewsbury and Crewe, quality and pacey wide players will tear him to pieces. But yes I know he is our captain and there are worse players in the team than him, so don't expect to see it happen. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 with 1432 views | mo_itfc | This makes no sense! Chambers has done pretty well at RB this season?? Lankester and Huws were terrible against Hull! | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 with 1428 views | Reusersgreasymop | Disturbing choice. RGM | | | |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:53 - Nov 27 with 1425 views | Hackneyblueboy | Holy Chambo Nsiala Woolf Ward Dozzell Huws Judge (personally I'd go McGavin) Lankaster Norwood Bennetts Ipswich 1 - Charlton 2 | | | |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:53 - Nov 27 with 1420 views | Herbivore |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 by Wallingford_Boy | I will tell you why. I thought Donacian was excellent against Portsmouth, offered a real attacking threat plus pace coming back. Chambers had a shocker against Hull (yes I know they all did) and whilst he can get away with it against the likes of Shrewsbury and Crewe, quality and pacey wide players will tear him to pieces. But yes I know he is our captain and there are worse players in the team than him, so don't expect to see it happen. |
Donacien was excellent against Portsmouth? Blimey. I sometimes wonder what you're watching, friend. I really do. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:54 - Nov 27 with 1414 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 by clive_baker | That's absolutely hideous. I would go 4-4-fecking-2: Holy Chambers Woolf McGuinnes Ward Lankester Dozzell McGavin Judge Norwood Jackson |
McGuinness needs a rest, making too many errors. I also wouldn't play two holding midfielders in the middle. Plus Jackson needs to be out wide if anywhere, he ain't a striker! Other than that, good line up! | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Tomorrow's line up on 10:54 - Nov 27 with 1413 views | pointofblue |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 by clive_baker | That's absolutely hideous. I would go 4-4-fecking-2: Holy Chambers Woolf McGuinnes Ward Lankester Dozzell McGavin Judge Norwood Jackson |
The centre of midfield would get over-run. Didn’t we play them together against Fleetwood just before lockdown - we couldn’t even get hold of the ball and we’re dispossessed with ease. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:56 - Nov 27 with 1401 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:53 - Nov 27 by Herbivore | Donacien was excellent against Portsmouth? Blimey. I sometimes wonder what you're watching, friend. I really do. |
Wasn't he picked out as MOTM by many? Haha fair enough, all about opinions, most on here tend to follow each other in terms of who is playing well/not playing well, pre season I was slated for saying Sears shouldn't be in the starting XI. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:59 - Nov 27 with 1381 views | clive_baker |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:54 - Nov 27 by pointofblue | The centre of midfield would get over-run. Didn’t we play them together against Fleetwood just before lockdown - we couldn’t even get hold of the ball and we’re dispossessed with ease. |
Crikey, that game. That was one of the worst lineups in our history. I would say. We're not blessed with many options tomorrow due to injury, I just think this might allow Dozzell and McGavin to sit a little deeper and Judge / Lankester to be busy and drifting inside. Almost creating a 4-2-4 and taking the game to Charlton. I really want to see Norwood and Jackson up front together. We look toothless in a 4-3-3 which in reality is more of a 4-5-1. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:00 - Nov 27 with 1376 views | Herbivore |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:56 - Nov 27 by Wallingford_Boy | Wasn't he picked out as MOTM by many? Haha fair enough, all about opinions, most on here tend to follow each other in terms of who is playing well/not playing well, pre season I was slated for saying Sears shouldn't be in the starting XI. |
No, McGavin was MOTM for pretty much everyone against Pompey. Norwood did well when he came on. I don't think anyone thought Donacien was excellent, your good self excepted. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:05 - Nov 27 with 1366 views | homer_123 |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 by clive_baker | That's absolutely hideous. I would go 4-4-fecking-2: Holy Chambers Woolf McGuinnes Ward Lankester Dozzell McGavin Judge Norwood Jackson |
Judge? JUDGE? JUDGEEEE!!!!???!??!???! | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:05 - Nov 27 with 1366 views | Chrisd |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:54 - Nov 27 by Wallingford_Boy | McGuinness needs a rest, making too many errors. I also wouldn't play two holding midfielders in the middle. Plus Jackson needs to be out wide if anywhere, he ain't a striker! Other than that, good line up! |
Might be right about McGuiness, but he was probably our best defender out of them all against Hull, all defenders with far more experienced than the Arsenal loanee. Our midfield is a huge concern for tomorrow, we just don't look like we have any player capable of getting forward and they all look so one paced. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:06 - Nov 27 with 1365 views | SomethingBlue | Shouldn't drop Chambers but there is merit in the rest of that. If we haven't really got a midfield then let's have as many dangerous players on the pitch as possible and that means Jackson out wide is a good shout. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:07 - Nov 27 with 1358 views | homer_123 |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 by mo_itfc | This makes no sense! Chambers has done pretty well at RB this season?? Lankester and Huws were terrible against Hull! |
Huws was utterly isolated. McGavin had dropped soooo deep and Judge was ahead of Norwood half the time, leaving Huws to cover the entire midfield on his own. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:08 - Nov 27 with 1354 views | clive_baker |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:54 - Nov 27 by Wallingford_Boy | McGuinness needs a rest, making too many errors. I also wouldn't play two holding midfielders in the middle. Plus Jackson needs to be out wide if anywhere, he ain't a striker! Other than that, good line up! |
McG looked more assured than Woolfenden on Tuesday night, so I'm not sure where that leaves him? Jackson is a striker. He's not a player we want with his back to goal or expecting him to link play. I want him playing off the shoulder of the last man. We need to go a little more direct and drop balls into the channels and ask questions of Charlton's make shift defence. With McGavin and Dozzell sitting in there they have the ability to find those runs from the front 2 with the wide men doing the donkey work. Charlton conceded 4 at Burton on Tuesday, we shouldn't be paying them any respect we should be taking it to them. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:08 - Nov 27 with 1351 views | MrTown | You can't drop Chambers, he started the season well, has dipped a little (more not being as effective going forward rather than errors - other than Hull). Would be crazy to drop him, but not crazy to make a partnership out of him and Woolfenden. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:09 - Nov 27 with 1351 views | clive_baker |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:05 - Nov 27 by homer_123 | Judge? JUDGE? JUDGEEEE!!!!???!??!???! |
Good point well made. I just don't see many other options for tomorrow sadly. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:09 - Nov 27 with 1345 views | homer_123 |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:09 - Nov 27 by clive_baker | Good point well made. I just don't see many other options for tomorrow sadly. |
One of my better debates it has to be said Clive. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:11 - Nov 27 with 1339 views | homer_123 | If we are going three up top - those are the three I'd go with, no question, 100% and all that. I'd drop Nsiala for Wilson and Lankester fro McGavin (swap Dozzer and McG around), if we have to stay 4-3-3 EDIT: Nsiala in for Wilson as Wilson is injured. DOH! [Post edited 27 Nov 2020 11:15]
| |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:12 - Nov 27 with 1334 views | StokieBlue |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 by clive_baker | That's absolutely hideous. I would go 4-4-fecking-2: Holy Chambers Woolf McGuinnes Ward Lankester Dozzell McGavin Judge Norwood Jackson |
You can't play Judge, you just can't. Doesn't matter if it has to be a youth you simply can't ever play him again for ITFC. Lambo isn't going to change the formation but that looks decent except in the centre of the park. Hole Chambers Wolf, Guiness, Ward Dozzell McGavin Dobra Lankester Bennetts Norwood No idea if 4-2-3-1 would work but so apathetic at the moment I just want to see something different which actually has a chance of working. SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:13 - Nov 27 with 1328 views | Chrisd |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:08 - Nov 27 by clive_baker | McG looked more assured than Woolfenden on Tuesday night, so I'm not sure where that leaves him? Jackson is a striker. He's not a player we want with his back to goal or expecting him to link play. I want him playing off the shoulder of the last man. We need to go a little more direct and drop balls into the channels and ask questions of Charlton's make shift defence. With McGavin and Dozzell sitting in there they have the ability to find those runs from the front 2 with the wide men doing the donkey work. Charlton conceded 4 at Burton on Tuesday, we shouldn't be paying them any respect we should be taking it to them. |
I'm thinking like you Clive Baker, I'd go with 2 up front, just to give us more threat than our toothless effort currently. However, is PL going to play 2 up top after his post match comments the other night? Really can't see it because that will be him admitting he was wrong. [Post edited 27 Nov 2020 11:16]
| |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:14 - Nov 27 with 1327 views | Darth_Koont |
Tomorrow's line up on 10:52 - Nov 27 by Wallingford_Boy | I will tell you why. I thought Donacian was excellent against Portsmouth, offered a real attacking threat plus pace coming back. Chambers had a shocker against Hull (yes I know they all did) and whilst he can get away with it against the likes of Shrewsbury and Crewe, quality and pacey wide players will tear him to pieces. But yes I know he is our captain and there are worse players in the team than him, so don't expect to see it happen. |
I also thought Donacien played very well. But I think the poorer recent games from Chambers, Ward and McGuinness are more symptomatic of how the team has lost its way. On a hopefully related note, it would be nice if Dozzell comes back in and can show he’s the metronome that gets us playing with a bit of tempo and purpose. | |
| |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:16 - Nov 27 with 1316 views | homer_123 |
Tomorrow's line up on 11:12 - Nov 27 by StokieBlue | You can't play Judge, you just can't. Doesn't matter if it has to be a youth you simply can't ever play him again for ITFC. Lambo isn't going to change the formation but that looks decent except in the centre of the park. Hole Chambers Wolf, Guiness, Ward Dozzell McGavin Dobra Lankester Bennetts Norwood No idea if 4-2-3-1 would work but so apathetic at the moment I just want to see something different which actually has a chance of working. SB |
And we both know SB that Dobras chances of playing equal Judges chances of being dropped. | |
| |
| |