By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
What an utter scumbag on 11:22 - Mar 29 by footers
They don't care what they do so long as they continue to upset those on the left. Literally cutting off their noses to spit their face, despite the lies, corruption and contempt for the average man on the street that the Tories have.
But bois has funny hair lol!
Literally?
2
What an utter scumbag on 12:04 - Mar 29 with 832 views
It is so rewarding to know that when I require guidance on morals I can turn to the TWTD Forum - I guess if we still had public flogging, some of you would insist that it is your right to cast the first stone. (I can think of at least half a dozen of you!)
On a lighter note, where is the promised sunshine this morning!
Oh go on then...
You are the obsolete SRN4 to my Fairey Rotodyne....
What an utter scumbag on 14:19 - Mar 29 by hype313
Sure I get that, he allegedly exchanged money for sex, and paid promptly, so what the spokes person is saying if you exchange favours with the PM, he will deliver as agreed.
Integrity and honesty right there.
1
What an utter scumbag on 14:32 - Mar 29 with 689 views
What an utter scumbag on 14:30 - Mar 29 by eireblue
Sure I get that, he allegedly exchanged money for sex, and paid promptly, so what the spokes person is saying if you exchange favours with the PM, he will deliver as agreed.
Integrity and honesty right there.
Wonder if he's actually a sex addict? Just sat in Downing Street all day pounding his parson.
Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
What an utter scumbag on 14:19 - Mar 29 by hype313
Wow. You almost have to admire the balls it takes to say that with a straight face. Even Johnson and his immediate family don't believe that either of those things are true of him.
What an utter scumbag on 14:39 - Mar 29 by Herbivore
Wow. You almost have to admire the balls it takes to say that with a straight face. Even Johnson and his immediate family don't believe that either of those things are true of him.
Why don't they give the press spokespersons name, c'mon, we all would love a giggle.
What an utter scumbag on 14:30 - Mar 29 by eireblue
Sure I get that, he allegedly exchanged money for sex, and paid promptly, so what the spokes person is saying if you exchange favours with the PM, he will deliver as agreed.
Integrity and honesty right there.
Integrity and honesty every time:
" On why quitting the EU won’t solve Britain’s problems: “We would have to recognise that most of our problems are not caused by “Bwussels”, but by chronic British short-termism, inadequate management, sloth, low skills, a culture of easy gratification and underinvestment in both human and physical capital and infrastructure,” he said in Daily Telegraph column in 2013."
“We are — and we will remain — a paid-up, valued, participating member of the Single Market,” Mr Johnson said in 2011. “Under no circumstances, in my view, will a British government adjust that position.”
"Matt Hancock took a swipe at leadership rival Boris Johnson’s “fck business” comments saying that, as prime minister, his attitude would be “fck fck business”."
Rab Butler as Chancellor once asked Churchill what they should do about the prostitution bill. Pay it of course said Churchill, and make sure it is claimed on expenses under entertainment.
Then of course we have had, Blunkett, Prescott, Ashdown, Hosie, Macneil, Major, Clark, Profumo...the list is endless.
It just proves that our politicians are representative of the public as a whole (oh yes it does before you all start shouting me down!)
Ah the sun did appear after all.....
-1
What an utter scumbag on 16:02 - Mar 29 with 577 views
Rab Butler as Chancellor once asked Churchill what they should do about the prostitution bill. Pay it of course said Churchill, and make sure it is claimed on expenses under entertainment.
Then of course we have had, Blunkett, Prescott, Ashdown, Hosie, Macneil, Major, Clark, Profumo...the list is endless.
It just proves that our politicians are representative of the public as a whole (oh yes it does before you all start shouting me down!)
Ah the sun did appear after all.....
Sorry, but if you think previous governments even come remotely close to touching this one for dishonesty and corruption, you don't know as much history as you give out you do.
0
What an utter scumbag on 16:12 - Mar 29 with 564 views
Rab Butler as Chancellor once asked Churchill what they should do about the prostitution bill. Pay it of course said Churchill, and make sure it is claimed on expenses under entertainment.
Then of course we have had, Blunkett, Prescott, Ashdown, Hosie, Macneil, Major, Clark, Profumo...the list is endless.
It just proves that our politicians are representative of the public as a whole (oh yes it does before you all start shouting me down!)
Ah the sun did appear after all.....
Not meaning to shout you down but you have appeared fairly recently and come across as agressive for no reason at times.
It's better for all of us if we get along and it was noticeable that you made some particularly kind comments to one poster the other week, so it's not like you're some kind of *insert your favourite insult here* is it.
I don't understand the attitude sometimes.
The posters on here in general do back up their points and don't just howl this stuff out because 'Tory'. A lot of people follow what goes on closely and know what they're talking about.
There are some other posters who, sometimes it's clear don't follow current affairs as closely, pop up here and there, say something derogatory for the heck of it, and then eff off until the next time they feel like showing their ignorance. (Think that Manchester person who never offers anything other than stupid remarks),
You are not them and are perfectly capable of putting your point across, even if it is fundamentally wrong!
Not meaning to shout you down but you have appeared fairly recently and come across as agressive for no reason at times.
It's better for all of us if we get along and it was noticeable that you made some particularly kind comments to one poster the other week, so it's not like you're some kind of *insert your favourite insult here* is it.
I don't understand the attitude sometimes.
The posters on here in general do back up their points and don't just howl this stuff out because 'Tory'. A lot of people follow what goes on closely and know what they're talking about.
There are some other posters who, sometimes it's clear don't follow current affairs as closely, pop up here and there, say something derogatory for the heck of it, and then eff off until the next time they feel like showing their ignorance. (Think that Manchester person who never offers anything other than stupid remarks),
You are not them and are perfectly capable of putting your point across, even if it is fundamentally wrong!
What an utter scumbag on 16:02 - Mar 29 by BlueLikeJazz
Sorry, but if you think previous governments even come remotely close to touching this one for dishonesty and corruption, you don't know as much history as you give out you do.
I believe this thread was initiated from the sex angle - that was my repost. As for your comments about dishonesty and corruption, yes I would like to have an unbiased discussion with several of you about the subject. I will never however resort to the type of rhetoric that many find acceptable. It is known that like millions of others I voted for Tories at the last election and for Brexit; to be told on a regular basis on here that all who voted for the Tories and or Brexit can go f--- themselves is not the type of discussion I want to be involved with and so stay clear. I was voting Labour probably long before some of you were born - and hope to do so again; the problem is that there is nowt happening yet in the party to suggest that me and the millions needed to get a labour government will return. I will always respect the views of others in spite of having all the normal human traits of sometimes getting it wrong. I can not though be so bloody minded and intolerant of others views as some on here. I came on the forum by accident, and am amazed at the depth of knowledge, kindness and understanding by many and apologise if that sounds patronising - it is not meant that way. Lots of you out there that want a change in the type of politics we currently have, need as I have said before to stop preaching to the converted and be kinder and show more humilty to those with differing views and try and convince them of your arguments in a balanced way. No one has a right to judge others to the level that a few do on here. Oh and Mr BlueLikeJazz, I failed history at O'level.........couldn't take politics in my day, other wise I would have done.
1
What an utter scumbag on 16:47 - Mar 29 with 505 views
I believe this thread was initiated from the sex angle - that was my repost. As for your comments about dishonesty and corruption, yes I would like to have an unbiased discussion with several of you about the subject. I will never however resort to the type of rhetoric that many find acceptable. It is known that like millions of others I voted for Tories at the last election and for Brexit; to be told on a regular basis on here that all who voted for the Tories and or Brexit can go f--- themselves is not the type of discussion I want to be involved with and so stay clear. I was voting Labour probably long before some of you were born - and hope to do so again; the problem is that there is nowt happening yet in the party to suggest that me and the millions needed to get a labour government will return. I will always respect the views of others in spite of having all the normal human traits of sometimes getting it wrong. I can not though be so bloody minded and intolerant of others views as some on here. I came on the forum by accident, and am amazed at the depth of knowledge, kindness and understanding by many and apologise if that sounds patronising - it is not meant that way. Lots of you out there that want a change in the type of politics we currently have, need as I have said before to stop preaching to the converted and be kinder and show more humilty to those with differing views and try and convince them of your arguments in a balanced way. No one has a right to judge others to the level that a few do on here. Oh and Mr BlueLikeJazz, I failed history at O'level.........couldn't take politics in my day, other wise I would have done.
I believe this thread was initiated from the sex angle - that was my repost. As for your comments about dishonesty and corruption, yes I would like to have an unbiased discussion with several of you about the subject. I will never however resort to the type of rhetoric that many find acceptable. It is known that like millions of others I voted for Tories at the last election and for Brexit; to be told on a regular basis on here that all who voted for the Tories and or Brexit can go f--- themselves is not the type of discussion I want to be involved with and so stay clear. I was voting Labour probably long before some of you were born - and hope to do so again; the problem is that there is nowt happening yet in the party to suggest that me and the millions needed to get a labour government will return. I will always respect the views of others in spite of having all the normal human traits of sometimes getting it wrong. I can not though be so bloody minded and intolerant of others views as some on here. I came on the forum by accident, and am amazed at the depth of knowledge, kindness and understanding by many and apologise if that sounds patronising - it is not meant that way. Lots of you out there that want a change in the type of politics we currently have, need as I have said before to stop preaching to the converted and be kinder and show more humilty to those with differing views and try and convince them of your arguments in a balanced way. No one has a right to judge others to the level that a few do on here. Oh and Mr BlueLikeJazz, I failed history at O'level.........couldn't take politics in my day, other wise I would have done.
" I failed history at O'level."
I see where you went wrong there.
You should have aimed low like me. I got a CSE in History.