Arguing with people you don't know on the internet 02:07 - Jan 6 with 5962 views | BondiBlue | and not even about football. Why? Doesn't it stress you out? That's surely not a pleasant feeling. |  |
| |  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:47 - Jan 6 with 1802 views | monytowbray |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:21 - Jan 6 by Cafe_Newman | Some silent type is going to downvote that for certain. I'll get in first with my sympathy. |
The quiet arrowers are misinfo bots and other posters sock puppets I swear. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:49 - Jan 6 with 1818 views | Plums | The two golden rules of the internet: * Don't be a d1ck * Understand that you'll never win an argument with a stranger online Pretty simple really. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:59 - Jan 6 with 1784 views | SE1blue | I only post in the ‘Football’ comments and avoid ‘General’ as it seems to have become a place of arguments that turn overly nasty and I can’t be done with that. Think Phil’s very kind to offer a ‘General’ section for people who want to have community discussion on this site, just wish people would respect that more. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:02 - Jan 6 with 1755 views | monytowbray |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:59 - Jan 6 by SE1blue | I only post in the ‘Football’ comments and avoid ‘General’ as it seems to have become a place of arguments that turn overly nasty and I can’t be done with that. Think Phil’s very kind to offer a ‘General’ section for people who want to have community discussion on this site, just wish people would respect that more. |
What I find more odd is everyone is on their moral high horse about “arguing” today when that’s already a gross and lazy misrepresentation of what actually happened. People were posting outright transphobia (again) and another section of this forum think it’s HILARIOUS to make a big joke about it for BANTZ (again) I’d argue that’s the saddest part - not those who care enough to call out bigotry but those who waste their day reciting their Jim Davidson comedy tribute no one asked for. If yesterday was about Jewish people, Muslims, Homosexuals or PoC 6-7 posters would have been banned, instead we lost Jeera, who despite a hugely misjudged post was probably the least offensive thing said yesterday in comparison. I wouldn’t feel comfortable bringing a trans friend to Portman Road at present. That isn’t something we should be proud of as a supporter base. [Post edited 6 Jan 2023 12:06]
|  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:12 - Jan 6 with 1740 views | SE1blue |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:02 - Jan 6 by monytowbray | What I find more odd is everyone is on their moral high horse about “arguing” today when that’s already a gross and lazy misrepresentation of what actually happened. People were posting outright transphobia (again) and another section of this forum think it’s HILARIOUS to make a big joke about it for BANTZ (again) I’d argue that’s the saddest part - not those who care enough to call out bigotry but those who waste their day reciting their Jim Davidson comedy tribute no one asked for. If yesterday was about Jewish people, Muslims, Homosexuals or PoC 6-7 posters would have been banned, instead we lost Jeera, who despite a hugely misjudged post was probably the least offensive thing said yesterday in comparison. I wouldn’t feel comfortable bringing a trans friend to Portman Road at present. That isn’t something we should be proud of as a supporter base. [Post edited 6 Jan 2023 12:06]
|
As I mentioned, I don’t read the General section so I have no idea what you’re referring to here and wouldn’t want to comment on it. I’m only here for the football. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:16 - Jan 6 with 1691 views | monytowbray |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:12 - Jan 6 by SE1blue | As I mentioned, I don’t read the General section so I have no idea what you’re referring to here and wouldn’t want to comment on it. I’m only here for the football. |
Oh it wasn’t aimed at you. For those who didn’t read it though I just wanted to ensure what actually happened isn’t overshadowed by over simplifying it to just arguing. It wasn’t arguing, it was posters being transphobic (again). |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:42 - Jan 6 with 1635 views | Dubtractor |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:49 - Jan 6 by Plums | The two golden rules of the internet: * Don't be a d1ck * Understand that you'll never win an argument with a stranger online Pretty simple really. |
That first rule is my approach to everything, let alone just the Internet. It is sound life advice that everyone should follow. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:56 - Jan 6 with 1543 views | FrimleyBlue | Can you take your argument back to the general tab please. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:58 - Jan 6 with 1531 views | BondiBlue |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:44 - Jan 6 by monytowbray | I’d argue posters demanding we deny human rights to sections of marginalised society and posting outright bigotry concerns us all. Trans rights aren’t world problems, there are trans people in Ipswich. A fair few actually. Was it more peaceful? How many people died at the hands of war and conflict in the last century? Whilst I appreciate the sentiment, it’s not a particularly informed take. |
You're right, it's not informed, and that's kind of my point. I've watched my parents inform themselves by doing their own research over the last few years and some of the things they come out with is concerning. I admire your energy. I'm just wondering if it's worth it. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:58 - Jan 6 with 1532 views | Vaughan8 | There are a few people, once they get on a thread that's it. MOST people at least take other peoples views and can see it. Others seem to not be able to do that. I agree with you its very odd and people are waiting there all day for a reply. Maybe they need to take a break. One particular poster rarely, if at all, posts on football things. Very odd! EDIT: The ignore function should be used more too. [Post edited 6 Jan 2023 13:02]
|  | |  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:58 - Jan 6 with 1535 views | PhilTWTD |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:16 - Jan 6 by monytowbray | Oh it wasn’t aimed at you. For those who didn’t read it though I just wanted to ensure what actually happened isn’t overshadowed by over simplifying it to just arguing. It wasn’t arguing, it was posters being transphobic (again). |
Again that's your version of events. If you continue to tell other users to 'f- off' regardless of the background to the comment you will no longer be welcome. |  | |  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:59 - Jan 6 with 1501 views | monytowbray |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:58 - Jan 6 by PhilTWTD | Again that's your version of events. If you continue to tell other users to 'f- off' regardless of the background to the comment you will no longer be welcome. |
Keep harbouring and defending transphobes Phil. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:59 - Jan 6 with 1503 views | BondiBlue |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:56 - Jan 6 by FrimleyBlue | Can you take your argument back to the general tab please. |
Haha yep fair point, surprised you're the first to mention it. It was muscle memory - i've only ever pressed the 'add football thread' button. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:00 - Jan 6 with 1498 views | PhilTWTD |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:59 - Jan 6 by monytowbray | Keep harbouring and defending transphobes Phil. |
I think I've actually had enough of the misrepresentations, as I know have a number of other posters. Time for us all to have a rest from it. |  | |  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:02 - Jan 6 with 1406 views | FrimleyBlue |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 12:59 - Jan 6 by BondiBlue | Haha yep fair point, surprised you're the first to mention it. It was muscle memory - i've only ever pressed the 'add football thread' button. |
Oh sorry Bondi. Didn't mean you. Meant to reply to that poster who started bringing in an argument from the general tab. Your OP was fine :) |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:08 - Jan 6 with 1331 views | clive_baker |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:00 - Jan 6 by PhilTWTD | I think I've actually had enough of the misrepresentations, as I know have a number of other posters. Time for us all to have a rest from it. |
Don't think there can be too many complaints after telling someone to f off. FWIW they were ridiculous accusation and misrepresentations, and no doubt highly offensive to those on the receiving end. You, the moderators, do a very good job in difficult circumstances IMO, towing a healthy line of allowing freedom of debate and being a space that's open to different opinions, while being quick to quash offensive content with very low tolerance to it. Shame that a few well meaning and honest folk had to be caught up in that level of slander, yourself included. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:09 - Jan 6 with 1307 views | SitfcB |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:00 - Jan 6 by PhilTWTD | I think I've actually had enough of the misrepresentations, as I know have a number of other posters. Time for us all to have a rest from it. |
Lasted a lot longer than I thought he would. Come back soon, MT/DC x |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:16 - Jan 6 with 1234 views | PhilTWTD |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:08 - Jan 6 by clive_baker | Don't think there can be too many complaints after telling someone to f off. FWIW they were ridiculous accusation and misrepresentations, and no doubt highly offensive to those on the receiving end. You, the moderators, do a very good job in difficult circumstances IMO, towing a healthy line of allowing freedom of debate and being a space that's open to different opinions, while being quick to quash offensive content with very low tolerance to it. Shame that a few well meaning and honest folk had to be caught up in that level of slander, yourself included. |
Thank you, that is very much appreciated. |  | |  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:52 - Jan 6 with 1118 views | Stu_Magoo |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:59 - Jan 6 by SE1blue | I only post in the ‘Football’ comments and avoid ‘General’ as it seems to have become a place of arguments that turn overly nasty and I can’t be done with that. Think Phil’s very kind to offer a ‘General’ section for people who want to have community discussion on this site, just wish people would respect that more. |
I also started filtering by "Football" a couple of years ago and it improved my experience no end. |  |
| THIS IS DEMOC-RRRRRRR-ACY MANIFEST! |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:53 - Jan 6 with 1097 views | lurcher |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:21 - Jan 6 by PhilTWTD | Glad to hear you say that. Welcome back! |
Thanks Phil, it is good to be back. |  | |  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 17:04 - Jan 6 with 973 views | PrideOfTheEast |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:08 - Jan 6 by clive_baker | Don't think there can be too many complaints after telling someone to f off. FWIW they were ridiculous accusation and misrepresentations, and no doubt highly offensive to those on the receiving end. You, the moderators, do a very good job in difficult circumstances IMO, towing a healthy line of allowing freedom of debate and being a space that's open to different opinions, while being quick to quash offensive content with very low tolerance to it. Shame that a few well meaning and honest folk had to be caught up in that level of slander, yourself included. |
Amazed it took so long. The poster is comfortably the most offensive I've ever encountered on here. |  | |  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 18:13 - Jan 6 with 901 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 11:49 - Jan 6 by Plums | The two golden rules of the internet: * Don't be a d1ck * Understand that you'll never win an argument with a stranger online Pretty simple really. |
(3)*don't post pictures of your dick. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 18:15 - Jan 6 with 897 views | Lord_Lucan |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 17:04 - Jan 6 by PrideOfTheEast | Amazed it took so long. The poster is comfortably the most offensive I've ever encountered on here. |
Aside from Keno of course |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 18:24 - Jan 6 with 875 views | Trequartista | Arguing is good if done in the right manner. You won't learn much from people you already agree with. If its not done in the right manner, e.g. when people regard their opinions as facts, then, as we have seen, it is not good. |  |
|  |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 18:29 - Jan 6 with 842 views | Dyland |
Arguing with people you don't know on the internet on 13:08 - Jan 6 by clive_baker | Don't think there can be too many complaints after telling someone to f off. FWIW they were ridiculous accusation and misrepresentations, and no doubt highly offensive to those on the receiving end. You, the moderators, do a very good job in difficult circumstances IMO, towing a healthy line of allowing freedom of debate and being a space that's open to different opinions, while being quick to quash offensive content with very low tolerance to it. Shame that a few well meaning and honest folk had to be caught up in that level of slander, yourself included. |
Ahem... libel not slander... fankyou |  |
|  |
| |