| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace 13:53 - Feb 9 with 15012 views | Aviator |
According to a well placed and trusted source at Palace. Can never be 100% with these things, but just passing on the info. [Post edited 9 Feb 2024 13:54]
|  | | |  |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:54 - Feb 9 with 2949 views | BlueBadger |
This horsesh1t again [Post edited 9 Feb 2024 18:54]
|  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:08 - Feb 9 with 2906 views | gtsb1966 |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:54 - Feb 9 by BlueBadger |
This horsesh1t again [Post edited 9 Feb 2024 18:54]
|
You said that on the Sam Williams thread and.... [Post edited 9 Feb 2024 19:08]
|  | | |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:45 - Feb 9 with 2820 views | FrimleyBlue |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 17:59 - Feb 9 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Again, I'm not remotely ratty. Let alone "so ratty". And I don't have a "pickle on" either. If you read what I actually post there's nothing at all to suggest I am, and plenty of clues (like the aforementioned "hmm") that show I'm really not. |
Thing is you don't know for sure what people have heard us wrong or made up. You can assume. Guess etc and try talk it down because you don't believe it.
Prime example
I heard from some drunk fella on a cruise that we had signed sarmiento before the announcement has I shared at the time... but you'd never believe I'd have heard something. |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:50 - Feb 9 with 2814 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 14:43 - Feb 9 by GavTWTD |
I can't see this poster lasting long |
Aviator is a yellow-feathered flier by the looks. |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:55 - Feb 9 with 2804 views | itfc48 |
If you're a tabloid journo throw a few quid on a manager market, create a new account on a fan forum and bingo you've got yourself an easy story. | | | |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 20:00 - Feb 9 with 2788 views | Bigalhunter |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:45 - Feb 9 by FrimleyBlue |
Thing is you don't know for sure what people have heard us wrong or made up. You can assume. Guess etc and try talk it down because you don't believe it.
Prime example
I heard from some drunk fella on a cruise that we had signed sarmiento before the announcement has I shared at the time... but you'd never believe I'd have heard something. |
Booze cruise? |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 20:01 - Feb 9 with 2780 views | Whos_blue |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:45 - Feb 9 by FrimleyBlue |
Thing is you don't know for sure what people have heard us wrong or made up. You can assume. Guess etc and try talk it down because you don't believe it.
Prime example
I heard from some drunk fella on a cruise that we had signed sarmiento before the announcement has I shared at the time... but you'd never believe I'd have heard something. |
Is this a hypothetical example or did you really get told by a drunk fella that Jezza had signed? |  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 20:12 - Feb 9 with 2748 views | FrimleyBlue |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 20:01 - Feb 9 by Whos_blue |
Is this a hypothetical example or did you really get told by a drunk fella that Jezza had signed? |
Yeah I got told by some fella on the cruise I was on. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 20:36 - Feb 9 with 2695 views | Ryorry |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 20:01 - Feb 9 by Whos_blue |
Is this a hypothetical example or did you really get told by a drunk fella that Jezza had signed? |
Reminds me of the party game 'Consequences', where you write down a name at the top of a bit of paper, fold it over, and pass it along to the next person, in the sequence A met B at C location. A said to B, B said to A, the consequence was D, then 'The World said' E.
So -
Kieran McKenna
met
Jeremy Corbyn
at
an 'Effective Negotiation' workshop in London.
JC said to KM - "I'm looking for work"
KM said to JC - "Have you tried South of the Thames"?
The consequence was
JC became Crystal Palace Manager
and the World said
"Those TWTD trolls can take a bathroom break now". |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 20:59 - Feb 9 with 2648 views | Vegtablue |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:45 - Feb 9 by FrimleyBlue |
Thing is you don't know for sure what people have heard us wrong or made up. You can assume. Guess etc and try talk it down because you don't believe it.
Prime example
I heard from some drunk fella on a cruise that we had signed sarmiento before the announcement has I shared at the time... but you'd never believe I'd have heard something. |
You're an established poster and don't have a reputation for inventing stories, so if you had posted that with conviction I'd have believed the event probably occurred. I wouldn't have been able to assess the credibility of the drunk fella but that's different.
The OP's posting history is a negative and their second post on the thread is to majorly correct the statements made in the first: from "well placed and trusted source" to "can't be 100% that he is well placed", and from seemingly first-hand information to hearsay. There are scales of plausibility and this poster roots the OP to the bottom. | | | |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 21:27 - Feb 9 with 2601 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:45 - Feb 9 by FrimleyBlue |
Thing is you don't know for sure what people have heard us wrong or made up. You can assume. Guess etc and try talk it down because you don't believe it.
Prime example
I heard from some drunk fella on a cruise that we had signed sarmiento before the announcement has I shared at the time... but you'd never believe I'd have heard something. |
I use my critical thinking skills to assess every claim on its individual merits. I've decided this one is poppycock, for the reasons already given. A lot of defo info claims I make no comment on because I don't have an inkling either way. If you want to believe everything you read, that's your lookout. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 21:34 - Feb 9 with 2584 views | BlueForYou |
Not going to happen. Think McKenna has some intelligence & wisdom beyond his years. He knows where he is going, & for the moment that is with Ipswich Town. He is one who will finish what he started. He’s not done anything of note, yet! |  | | |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 22:12 - Feb 9 with 2519 views | Eireannach_gorm |
Kieran neglected to mention when he was leaving at the press conference. Probably just slipped his mind. |  | | |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 22:23 - Feb 9 with 2491 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 22:12 - Feb 9 by Eireannach_gorm |
Kieran neglected to mention when he was leaving at the press conference. Probably just slipped his mind. |
Probably in a hurry to get down to London so he can leave early in the morning to get back again. Going to be shattered trying to manage us tomorrow! | |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 22:49 - Feb 9 with 2436 views | nodge_blue |
I think he will want a bigger club than palace should he move. |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 06:46 - Feb 10 with 2284 views | GiveusaWave |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:50 - Feb 9 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Aviator is a yellow-feathered flier by the looks. |
Or a Bournemouth fan who appeared when we signed Moore |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 10:15 - Feb 10 with 2158 views | ArnieM |
OP utter claptrap:
No, my full focus, full commitment is with Ipswich and the season that we’re having and the next game ahead, so that’s where all my energy is and all my commitment is,” he said.
“I don’t pay any attention to it, to be honest. It’s not the first time in the last couple of years. If you’re doing well, it’s going to be there and there are going to be links. |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:46 - Feb 13 with 1896 views | Aviator |
told you. | | | |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:49 - Feb 13 with 1887 views | Trequartista |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:46 - Feb 13 by Aviator |
told you. |
Told us he was in advanced talks with Palace? |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:51 - Feb 13 with 1871 views | Aviator |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:49 - Feb 13 by Trequartista |
Told us he was in advanced talks with Palace? |
Correct. | | | |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:52 - Feb 13 with 1864 views | Trequartista |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:51 - Feb 13 by Aviator |
Correct. |
Well he isn't according to the news story on here. | |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:53 - Feb 13 with 1860 views | Mullet |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:46 - Feb 13 by Aviator |
told you. |
From the Guardian piece you are trying to claim reflected glory from:
The Palace chairman, Steve Parish, is understood to have spoken to McKenna’s representatives but McKenna is believed to be unwilling to consider leaving while his side, in fourth place, are challenging for promotion in the Championship.
That is an enquiry which has long been known about. Nowhere near "advanced talks" at all.
So, no, you didn't tell us. You took a bit of common knowledge and tried to pass it off as something more to stir the pot a bit. |  |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:57 - Feb 13 with 1839 views | Aviator |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:53 - Feb 13 by Mullet |
From the Guardian piece you are trying to claim reflected glory from:
The Palace chairman, Steve Parish, is understood to have spoken to McKenna’s representatives but McKenna is believed to be unwilling to consider leaving while his side, in fourth place, are challenging for promotion in the Championship.
That is an enquiry which has long been known about. Nowhere near "advanced talks" at all.
So, no, you didn't tell us. You took a bit of common knowledge and tried to pass it off as something more to stir the pot a bit. |
I told you on the 9th he was in talks with Palace. The Guardian story today confirms this. | | | |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:00 - Feb 13 with 1794 views | Mullet |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:57 - Feb 13 by Aviator |
I told you on the 9th he was in talks with Palace. The Guardian story today confirms this. |
So you were slow to the news and overinflated it massively and you're still trying to brag about it? Palace's interest has been rumoured for a while now.
I get this is some sort of big deal for you maybe, but you're grasping here at best. | |
| |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 19:01 - Feb 13 with 1788 views | Ryorry |
| McKenna in advanced talks with Palace on 18:57 - Feb 13 by Aviator |
I told you on the 9th he was in talks with Palace. The Guardian story today confirms this. |
Your subject header literally says "McKenna in *advanced* talks with Palace. So the Guardian piece today not only doesn't confirm your OP, it actually contradicts you. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
