| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) 22:30 - Apr 30 with 1736 views | homer_123 |
|  |
| |  |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:30 - Apr 30 with 1703 views | Suffolktractor |
Absolute stonewaller.
Omari never seems to get them. |  | | |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:30 - Apr 30 with 1703 views | belgablue |
Yes, but only if you're a Leicester or Leeds player. |  |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:31 - Apr 30 with 1699 views | textbackup |
Yeah, but why has he not shot before that tackle comes in? |  |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:31 - Apr 30 with 1682 views | NthQldITFC |
I think so. Got in front of his man, Bundled over form behind. Leeds or Leicester - that's a pen. Lucky? |  |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:31 - Apr 30 with 1675 views | homer_123 |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:31 - Apr 30 by textbackup |
Yeah, but why has he not shot before that tackle comes in? |
How's the back? | |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:34 - Apr 30 with 1598 views | Ryorry |
99/100 yes.
That bloody sub ref. “Lucky Ipswich” eh! |  |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:38 - Apr 30 with 1543 views | LankHenners |
100%. Obviously the ref has to be replaced if he can't keep up with play but thought it was unfair that they subbed a Coventry fan on in his place.
Several incredibly soft free kicks given to them towards the end as well. |  |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:41 - Apr 30 with 1475 views | Swansea_Blue |
I can take off the blue goggles, but yeah that would normally be given as a pen. Slightly looking for it, but there was enough contact to genuinely push him off the ball (as opposed to there just being any contact, which seems to be enough reason for TV pundits). 90% that’s given as a pen. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:42 - Apr 30 with 1463 views | Ryorry |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:38 - Apr 30 by LankHenners |
100%. Obviously the ref has to be replaced if he can't keep up with play but thought it was unfair that they subbed a Coventry fan on in his place.
Several incredibly soft free kicks given to them towards the end as well. |
Please tell me he wasn’t actually a Cov fan? 
Or am I being whooshed… | |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:44 - Apr 30 with 1384 views | itfcserbia |
wasn't a 100%, maybe 80-ish? Tbh Omari could've shot twice by the time Thomas bundled him over. And we got a goal from an offside position, which almost never happens so all in all, luck evened itself out? |  |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:51 - Apr 30 with 1276 views | Ryorry |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:44 - Apr 30 by itfcserbia |
wasn't a 100%, maybe 80-ish? Tbh Omari could've shot twice by the time Thomas bundled him over. And we got a goal from an offside position, which almost never happens so all in all, luck evened itself out? |
Yeah, also thought offside not spotted there - first bit of luck to go our way for ... well, so long that I've forgotten the last bit! | |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:52 - Apr 30 with 1266 views | bazza |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:31 - Apr 30 by textbackup |
Yeah, but why has he not shot before that tackle comes in? |
Not sure if it was the way we set up tonight, but hutch was very quiet tonight. Hope he puts a hull performance in on Saturday. |  | | |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:54 - Apr 30 with 1198 views | norfsufblue |
So that’s just 3 offences against in the box in NOW 45 games!! |  | | |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:55 - Apr 30 with 1173 views | Wickets |
Ref gave a corner but I dont think the defender touched the ball yes it was a Penalty for me . [Post edited 30 Apr 2024 22:56]
|  | | |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:56 - Apr 30 with 1152 views | textbackup |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:31 - Apr 30 by homer_123 |
How's the back? |
Proper sore man! Thanks for asking.
I laid dead still, and didn’t move for 90mins (112mins) Saturday is going to be horrible | |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:56 - Apr 30 with 1132 views | Trequartista |
98.8%
Stonewall but a bit cracked and weathered. |  |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:56 - Apr 30 with 1124 views | AB_ITFC |
Blatent pen. Lucky ipswich doesn’t need them though! We make our own luck. |  | | |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:57 - Apr 30 with 1102 views | Tangledupin_Blue |
Also looked like a handball immediately before our second goal. If we hadn't scored then should be a penalty. |  |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 23:37 - Apr 30 with 898 views | Nutkins_Return |
Looked it 100% from where I was. | |
| |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 23:42 - Apr 30 with 854 views | acj |
| Irrelevant but....that was,100%, a pen on Omari, right? (n/t) on 22:44 - Apr 30 by itfcserbia |
wasn't a 100%, maybe 80-ish? Tbh Omari could've shot twice by the time Thomas bundled him over. And we got a goal from an offside position, which almost never happens so all in all, luck evened itself out? |
Weird one for our second goal - Edmundson was only offside because of a blatant push by their player. Surely you can’t just push an opponent into being offside and therefore deny them the chance to get involved, but equally what a weird penalty that would be. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
